Would love to watch them all.
Wish Her great success with her outstanding message to America.
HRC 2016

hit and miss ones.

Or be linked via house parties perhaps. Good that she will have private gatherings of invited supporters followed by open forums where she will answer questions.
(How I understand it anyway)
I'll keep looking for links.
Thanks

.. which can be very revealing, and are not otherwise reported in the press.
I remember seeing on C-SPAN some wonderful town hall and living-room-type events(including a house party featuring singing and warm testimony by Carole King) with Sen. Kerry in both Iowa and New Hampshire in 2003. The footage showed Kerry as someone who was funny, knowledgeable, quick on his feet, approachable, warmly (even eagerly)interested in and responsive to questions and comments by individual voters, and (though it was understandably not in his interest to emphasize that at the time) easily answering French-speaking reporters in fluent French -- stuff that the press never ever reported on adequately.
The media coverage of the 2004 election was abominable, and I don't expect that it will be any better this time.
But at least internet tools and social media are better developed than they were in 2004; as you said, we will have the streaming sites, apps, etc, and also C-SPAN, to direct voters to real facts and real events. Look for those smaller events: they're fun to watch, and they reinforced for me why, for all the complaining among the Talking Heads, and political strategists, states like Iowa and New Hampshire remain so important for the process.Early primaries/caucuses in small states provide the only chance for voters to see presidential candidates in more informal and intimate and (hopefully) less staged settings; and it's the only chance for candidates to get to know real voters (and hopefully not just those who are big donors) up close and personal .

they were riding on the campaign bus to an event and doing an interview.

And I agree that I definitely wouldn't rely on the soundbite "network" media to cover the intricacies of campaign stops because unless there is some sort of "controversy" that could give them a scandalous "breaking news" story, the campaign trail is essentially "boring" to them.

field? Where have we heard that before? TPP.

profits.

during its history, try looking up the merchants who traded in tea, sugar, rum, tobacco, and most notably HUMANS, by bringing millions of Africans here as slaves as part of the oft-mentioned "trade triangles".

has not always been agreeable to them having more profits and especially more power when it came in conflict with the needs of the people.

This bill has no protection for the worker in our own country or in the other countries. Oh sure there are words but no explanation as to how this is going to be enforced.

These wonderful corporations that you want given more power have gone into the poor less powerful nations and with the help of WTO, IMF and the World Bank totally destroyed the original economies and turned them into little plantations full of slaves. Poorly cared for slaves at that.

How do I know this - setting in with African students studying at both colleges I attended - one in Nebraska and the University of Iowa where I go my masters.

They told us how the system of small farms that fed their families was destroyed by corporations who forced them off the land and into the cities so that the corporations could grow crops for exportation to people like us in order to pay the loans that were supposed to create jobs in the cities for displaced persons. The WTO, IMF and the World Bank never created the city jobs. All that happened was that the people got poorer. Is that what we want to continue to happen when these wonderful corporations get more power?

It is nothing new. Whether through familial "empires" or royalty or more formalized governmental systems such as parliamentary or republic. You see it in Communist countries like Russia and China where the traders are allowed to do their thing as long as they pay their tribute. And It doesn't matter if some entity organizations have cropped up over the centuries to shepherd it all along, but people have been exploited for forever. Governments are irrelevant to the moguls in the context of trade. These moguls have always operated around them or in consort with them. Before the World Bank, there was the Rothschilds.

IMHO, we need to keep history straight when it comes to these types of arguments.

I am opposed to the TPP and the way it is being handled (large, unwieldy multi-lateral agreements open themselves up for massive loopholes). But I do think there should be trade agreements between nations. Theoretically the U.S. has been blessed with all sorts of resources to actually allow us to completely close down to the outside. But then the risk of doing so includes the potential for other nations to plot to "take" those resources from us (in a literal war sense). So the trade issue essentially kicks that can and day down the road.

And unfortunately, "greed" is a trait that is part of a suite primordial human nature behaviors (as a survival instinct in times of famine or extreme environmental catastrophe), where some can't distinguish when one is not in that state of being that would require such hoarding (which occurs at the detriment of others).

to be. Since the 1980s they have basically reflected the trickle down theory and globalization.

And as you say - we have always been a globe. We do not need multi-national corporations replacing nations. We do not need one world government. We have enough trouble with one government in the USA representing the differing regions.

In essence - "globalization". It didn't just begin with Reagan. They just "modernized" it. There have historically been "one world" governments in major parts of the world where natural resources were available.

Popular examples -

















Trade occurred between from 3 to 5 continents. These were the "one world governments" of their times. The time of today is what is often dubbed "Pax Americana". And it too shall pass like all the others.

their contribution to history.

If so, I hope you make it out there and have a good time
If not, maybe when she comes to your home state you can get out and see her in person

I think Hillary and Bill could say the same exact thing and it would seem earnest from Bill and seem like contrived political BS from Hillary.

That has nothing to do with their gender. I just think Hillary is not very good at politics and Bill was one of the best ever.

Not one Hillary supporter crapped in it.

Try to learn by example, K?