Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Omaha Steve

(99,632 posts)
Tue Jun 16, 2015, 08:31 PM Jun 2015

Ex-AIG CEO still wants damages in bailout case, will appeal

Source: AP

NEW YORK (AP) — The former chairman and CEO of insurer AIG says he still believes he's entitled to damages as a result of the government's 2008 bailout of the company, and will appeal a court's ruling against him.

A federal judge gave Maurice Greenberg a partial win Monday when he ruled that the $85 billion government bailout was unfairly punitive and that the government was not entitled to take ownership of AIG in return for its bailout loan. But the judge said the government doesn't have to pay damages to Greenberg and other AIG shareholders.

Greenberg says he will appeal that part of the ruling but is pleased with the rest.

Greenberg wants more than $40 billion in damages. He said Tuesday that if the government wasn't allowed to demand equity in AIG as a condition of the bailout, it's also not entitled to the money it received from selling AIG shares later.

Read more: http://bigstory.ap.org/article/1a99f709016a4ca6a1d704ea656d17b9/ex-aig-ceo-still-wants-damages-bailout-case-will-appeal



__

This story has been corrected to show the judge didn't find the government violated the Fifth Amendment by failing to give fair compensation to AIG shareholders.
4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Ex-AIG CEO still wants damages in bailout case, will appeal (Original Post) Omaha Steve Jun 2015 OP
Part of the entitled wealthy. TexasTowelie Jun 2015 #1
The Government (ie Taxpayers) doesn't owe any of those crooks a dime... ToxMarz Jun 2015 #2
We weren't held hostage MFrohike Jun 2015 #3
Greenberg is a jerk and is not entitled to damages Gothmog Jun 2015 #4

TexasTowelie

(112,189 posts)
1. Part of the entitled wealthy.
Tue Jun 16, 2015, 08:54 PM
Jun 2015

Not only does he believe that he is entitled to the money from AIG, but most of the business for Starr Insurance is written through a Bermuda subsidiary that does not pay corporate taxes and uses salaried workers in the US that work 70-80 hours a week. I know from personal experience.

ToxMarz

(2,167 posts)
2. The Government (ie Taxpayers) doesn't owe any of those crooks a dime...
Tue Jun 16, 2015, 09:41 PM
Jun 2015

This was definitely a case of the Govt picking winners and losers. They were all complicit in the scheme that threatened to collapse our entire economy (and the rest of the world) and we were held hostage. The winners (JP Morgan, Goldman Sachs, et al) chose who should be the sacrificial lambs in order to secure a Govt bailout. If AIG or any others are entitled to anything, it must come from the chosen winners and not the taxpayers. AIG was chosen because it insured all of the others bad paper and no one else but the US Treasury could guarantee 100% insurance payout on the worthless paper they sold in the name of "protecting investors".

MFrohike

(1,980 posts)
3. We weren't held hostage
Tue Jun 16, 2015, 09:57 PM
Jun 2015

The Fed and Treasury are and were ideologically captured. They didn't give the bankers a choice in the bailout.

AIG was chosen because it was a convenient to launder funds. It was used to hide the insolvency of the investment banks.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Ex-AIG CEO still wants da...