Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Little Tich

(6,171 posts)
Tue Jun 16, 2015, 09:27 PM Jun 2015

New York appeals court hears arguments over grand jury records in chokehold death

Source: Yahoo! News / Reuters

NEW YORK (Reuters) - A New York state appeals court heard arguments on Tuesday over unsealing minutes of a grand jury that declined to indict a white New York police officer in the chokehold death of an unarmed black man.

A coalition of groups seeking release of the transcripts told the four-judge panel that grand jury secrecy undermined confidence in the justice system and hampered debate among state lawmakers weighing grand jury reforms.

The groups, which included the Legal Aid Society, want the appeals court to overturn a Staten Island justice's decision in March to bar release of records of the grand jury that probed the death of Eric Garner, 43, last year.

"The secrecy only reinforces suspicion, and there is deep suspicion here in the communities of color and among others," New York Civil Liberties Union attorney Art Eisenberg told the justices of the Supreme Court Appellate Division Second Department.

Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/york-appeals-court-hears-arguments-over-grand-jury-200708541.html

1 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New York appeals court hears arguments over grand jury records in chokehold death (Original Post) Little Tich Jun 2015 OP
While I disagree with it, seems like grand jury procedings are normally secret Stryst Jun 2015 #1

Stryst

(714 posts)
1. While I disagree with it, seems like grand jury procedings are normally secret
Tue Jun 16, 2015, 11:28 PM
Jun 2015

The U.S. Supreme Court in 1979 identified several reasons for maintaining such secrecy. First, without the assurance of confidentiality, many prospective witnesses would hesitate to come forward willingly, knowing that the people against whom they testify would find out about it; second, those who did come forward would be less likely to testify “fully and frankly” because they would be vulnerable to retribution and inducements; third, people about to be indicted might flee, or try to influence individual grand jurors to vote against indictment; and finally, it protects those who are accused, but not indicted, from public scorn. - See more at: http://www.rcfp.org/secret-justice-grand-juries/access-grand-jury-information-and-material#sthash.shWIKqH2.dpuf

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»New York appeals court he...