NC teacher resigns amid outcry over reading 3rd-graders story of princes who marry each other
Source: strib
After a third-grader tearfully recounted how another boy had called him "gay" during gym class, teacher Omar Currie chose to raise the issue during story time by reading his students a fable about a prince who falls in love with another prince, ending with a happily-ever-after royal wedding.
That decision in April ignited a public outcry from some parents in the rural hamlet of Efland, North Carolina, resulting in Currie's resignation this week from a job he loved. The assistant principal who loaned Currie her copy of "King & King" has also resigned, and outraged parents are pressuring administrators at the Orange County Schools to ban the book.
"When I read the story, the reaction of parents didn't come into my mind," Currie, 25, said Tuesday. "In that moment, it just seemed natural to me to read the book and have a conversation about treating people with respect. My focus then was on the child, and helping the child."
Currie knows firsthand what it is like to be bullied. Growing up gay and black in a small town in the eastern part of the state, his memories of middle school are of being a frequent target for teasing and slurs.
Read more: http://www.startribune.com/teacher-resigns-after-reading-students-book-about-gay-couple/307724951/
barbtries
(28,794 posts)small minded, willfully ignorant assholes. and now a little boy without an advocate.
chillfactor
(7,576 posts)what a thoughtful, caring teacher....those despicable parents need to be ostracized....not the teacher or the assistant principal...makes me sick inside....
alboe
(192 posts)jmowreader
(50,557 posts)Orange County is one of the few authentically liberal places in the South - it's the home of UNC, the school Jesse Helms said should have a wall erected around it to "keep its liberal views from infecting the rest of the South."
oberliner
(58,724 posts)"The experience was very overwhelming in terms of the amount of support I received," he said.
Omaha Steve
(99,632 posts)K&R for the teacher, not the ass-hat closed minded parents.!
Volaris
(10,271 posts)Yeah, right. Anything on the schools 'hey, let's ban it' list was usually went to the top of my want-to-read selections.
didn't matter what it was, it's the principle of the thing.
banning books..how fucking medieval can u get?
oberliner
(58,724 posts)The book was approved.
Volaris
(10,271 posts)"...and outraged parents are pressuring administrators at the Orange County Schools to ban the book."
I didn't do a follow-up, so if the suggestion that it should be banned was shot down, I haven't seen that yet.
Love and solidarity,
Vol
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Currie had said he would resign because he felt administrators did not support him after he read King & King, in which two princes fall in love and get married. He has said he read the book after a boy in his class was called gay in a derogatory way and told he was acting like a girl.
A school review committee upheld the use of the book twice. But Principal Kiley Brown told Currie that teachers would have to submit a list of all books they read to parents.
Parent Brandy Davis, one of three people who filed formal complaints about the book, appealed the review committees ruling to the superintendent. As part of that appeal, the school district will hold a public meeting at 6 p.m. Thursday at Gravelly Hill Middle School, 4801 W. Ten Road in Efland.
Currie said Monday he will prepare remarks but is not sure if hell speak.
http://www.newsobserver.com/news/local/community/chapel-hill-news/article24528550.html#storylink=cpy
Hopefully the administration won't go back on their approval of the use of the book.
alp227
(32,025 posts)Oh it's only for racists, homophobes, and evangelicals.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)Hoppy
(3,595 posts)Yes, Gertrude, its sarcasm.
avebury
(10,952 posts)problem with the Oklahoma City Metropolitan Libary. I had never heard of the book until some woman had a hissy fit when she saw her child pick up the book at the library. It resulted in several months worth of public meetings being conducted by the library board and some (like Oklahoma nutjub and State Rep Sally Kern) calling for book segregation. I had not even heard of Kern until this happened and, after seeing her speak at one of the meetings, realized that she is a total nut job.
Book segregation became a huge issue. Kern even tried to introduce legislation that would have denied pubic funds to any library that did not segragate certain books. Fortunately, the bill did not pass. Of course the issue becomes who gets to decide what books are "segregated", what criteria is used to decide what books are segregated, just what constitutes segration, do the various libraries have the means to segragate the targeted books and so on. The conservatives were, segregate the books and do it now without a clue as to whether or not their demands were both rational and possible. I spoke out at one of the meetings about that.
Alkene
(752 posts)That's about right.
riversedge
(70,220 posts)Although a few years old--it is encouraging if case goes to court. But seems the teacher and his partner will move on.
...."King & King" has been a subject of controversy before. In 2006, the parents of a Massachusetts second-grader sued after the book was read in their child's class. A federal judge later ruled against them, saying the rights of parents to exercise their religious and moral beliefs are not violated when children are exposed to differing ideas in public school.
In his two years at Efland elementary, Currie said his sexual orientation had never been an issue. His co-workers, and some parents, knew he lives with his male partner.
But at the committee meetings to discuss Currie's use of the book, some parents whose children were not in his class made their attacks personal, telling him he would die young and spend eternity in hell. He also began receiving hate-filled letters and emails, including one copied to other teachers at the school, described homosexuality as a "birth defect" while accusing Currie of trying to "indoctrinate" children through "psycho-emotional rape."
Though he says administrators never formally disciplined him for his decision to read the book, Currie said he was made to feel that he had done something wrong and felt pressured to leave the school. He is currently looking for another teaching job.
Lochloosa
(16,064 posts)The book being read to them or the reaction from their bigoted asshole parents?
What is it going to be like for them to go back to class and being blamed for the loss of obviously a good, caring teacher?
Time will tell.
One_Life_To_Give
(6,036 posts)&$^% Mom is a Bitch, in D Minor.
LibertyLover
(4,788 posts)Recently in an advice column in the Washington Post called "Civilities" a grandparent wrote in to complain that "their" values were being undermined "King and King" was read in her grandchild's school in Efland and asked what could "they" do about it. The columnist's response was diplomatic but firm. Basically he told the grandmother that while he understood she was upset, her rights had not been infringed. The column went on to say that books were a powerful agent of change and that teaching empathy to children was extremely important.
mainer
(12,022 posts)It's not like he brought it in from home.
Now teachers can't use books that have already been cleared by their own school?