Rachel Dolezal: 'No biological proof' she has white parents
Source: AP
SPOKANE, Wash. (AP) The woman who resigned as president of the Spokane NAACP after her parents revealed she was white posing as black says there's no proof they are her mother and father.
In an interview with NBC News on Tuesday night (http://nbcnews.to/1LfaDYU ), Rachel Dolezal said she hasn't had a DNA test and there's no "biological proof" that Larry and Ruthanne Dolezal are her parents.
NBC's Savannah Guthrie pointed out there's a birth certificate that lists the Dolezals as her parents.
Rachel Dolezal responded that she can't prove her parentage one way or another.
FULL story at link.
In this image released by NBC News, former NAACP leader Rachel Dolezal appears on the "Today" show set on Tuesday, June 16, 2015, in New York. Dolezal was born to two parents who say they are white, but she chooses instead to self-identify as black. Her ability to think she has a choice shows a new fluidity in race in a diversifying America, a place where the rigid racial structures that defined most of this countrys history seems, for some, to be falling to the wayside. (Anthony Quintano/NBC News via AP)
Read more: http://bigstory.ap.org/article/6b2c25ff3ceb481eb2ebc0973fbbd436/rachel-dolezal-no-biological-proof-she-has-white-parents
lark
(23,100 posts)This article is way too nice. She's lying, plain and simple.
Chakab
(1,727 posts)wordpix
(18,652 posts)Doesn't identify with her parents for one thing. Must be bad blood there.
wolfie001
(2,240 posts)....must've been a hoot!
Warpy
(111,261 posts)that's way above DU's pay grade. She's bonkers.
I feel sorry for her parents, it has to be horrible for them right now.
jwirr
(39,215 posts)Sen. Walter Sobchak
(8,692 posts)I had a crazy family member who pretended to be both Egyptian and Native American and varying times. He even got himself hired as a technical adviser on a Hollywood movie.
It's stupid and if one has the capacity should be embarrassing, but hardly a big deal.
happyslug
(14,779 posts)The closest he ever came to India was Indiana but he made a decent living running as a India Guru up and down the East Coast in the late 1800s and early 1900s. If I remember the stories right he avoided people from India, they had no money (that is if he actually meet any, which some family members believe to be the case).
Nay
(12,051 posts)Skittles
(153,160 posts)Renew Deal
(81,859 posts)wordpix
(18,652 posts)I have a perfectly sane family member who's trans and very happy and content that way, has a full-time job AND is getting a master's degree, has been happily married for 5 yrs., has lots of friends and is planning a family.
I think of this story as much the same. RD identifies as black but wasn't born that way, just as my fam member identifies as male but was born female. It makes sense that if she doesn't identify with her white abusive parents, she would look elsewhere for support and she found it among her black friends/family and now identifies as black.
Not saying she's not lying about some aspects of her story but what's a lie and what is her present reality as someone who identifies as Afr. American?
I feel sorry for her.
derby378
(30,252 posts)Your trans friend was, in all likelihood, born physiologically female but biochemically male. When it comes down to brain vs. genitals, guess which organ wins?
Let Rachel seek DNA testing so we can finally put this to rest.
Shadowflash
(1,536 posts)ann---
(1,933 posts)HER son asked for a DNA test to prove that SHE is his mother.
This woman is severely disturbed.
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)Just get the test.
wheniwasincongress
(1,307 posts)we can send her to Maury or Jerry Springer, where she and this irrelevant saga belongs?
LisaL
(44,973 posts)Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)Nay
(12,051 posts)hear about people like this woman!
Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)And someday soon, they're going to pick me back up!
Nay
(12,051 posts)leftynyc
(26,060 posts)She's either mentally ill or simply a pathological liar. She's embarrassing her entire family.
lame54
(35,290 posts)leftynyc
(26,060 posts)can get bent. That her parents are imbeciles and maybe abusers doesn't give her license to lie the way she does. Tell me you're not defending her actions.
murielm99
(30,741 posts)But I do understand that she is an abuse victim. As the article points out, abuse victims do hurt others and they do crazy things.
It is a shame that this story has become public. She should step out of the limelight and get the help she needs. She is right to shun her parents. But now that this is public, I wonder if she will ever acknowledge that she has a broken moral compass, needs to face her problems, take responsibility for them, and find a way to heal.
Response to murielm99 (Reply #22)
GGJohn This message was self-deleted by its author.
1monster
(11,012 posts)keep their children unless they go through extensive training and monitoring. Religion should never be allowed to excuse or extenuate parents who so damage their children.
wordpix
(18,652 posts)rosesaylavee
(12,126 posts)Fundie wingnut parents and child abuse...
I think the rest of the story will unfold and make better sense eventually. Of course lying about race is not ok -- but I think there is much more going on here.
LiberalElite
(14,691 posts)douggg
(239 posts)The truth would have been workable but she has left the realm of credibility.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)jakeXT
(10,575 posts)The One-Drop Rule Defined
To be considered black in the United States not even half of one's ancestry must be African black. But will one-fourth do, or one-eighth, or less? The nation's answer to the question 'Who is black?" has long been that a black is any person with any known African black ancestry. This definition reflects the long experience with slavery and later with Jim Crow segregation. In the South it became known as the "one-drop rule,'' meaning that a single drop of "black blood" makes a person a black. It is also known as the "one black ancestor rule," some courts have called it the "traceable amount rule," and anthropologists call it the "hypo-descent rule," meaning that racially mixed persons are assigned the status of the subordinate group. This definition emerged from the American South to become the nation's definition, generally accepted by whites and blacks. Blacks had no other choice. As we shall see, this American cultural definition of blacks is taken for granted as readily by judges, affirmative action officers, and black protesters as it is by Ku Klux Klansmen.
Let us not he confused by terminology. At present the usual statement of the one-drop rule is in terms of "black blood" or black ancestry, while not so long ago it referred to "Negro blood" or ancestry. The term "black" rapidly replaced "Negro" in general usage in the United States as the black power movement peaked at the end of the 1960s, but the black and Negro populations are the same. The term "black" is used in this book for persons with any black African lineage, not just for unmixed members of populations from sub-Saharan Africa. The term "Negro," which is used in certain historical contexts, means the same thing. Terms such as "African black," "unmixed Negro," and "all black" are used here to refer to unmixed blacks descended from African populations.
...
Uniqueness Of The One-Drop Rule
Not only does the one-drop rule apply to no other group than American blacks, but apparently the rule is unique in that it is found only in the United States and not in any other nation in the world. In fact, definitions of who is black vary quite sharply from country to country, and for this reason people in other countries often express consternation about our definition. James Baldwin relates a revealing incident that occurred in 1956 at the Conference of Negro-African Writers and Artists held in Paris. The head of the delegation of writers and artists from the United States was John Davis. The French chairperson introduced Davis and then asked him why he considered himself Negro, since he certainly did not look like one. Baldwin wrote, "He is a Negro, of course, from the remarkable legal point of view which obtains in the United States, but more importantly, as he tried to make clear to his interlocutor, he was a Negro by choice and by depth of involvement--by experience, in fact."
The phenomenon known as "passing as white" is difficult to explain in other countries or to foreign students. Typical questions are: "Shouldn't Americans say that a person who is passing as white is white, or nearly all white, and has previously been passing as black?" or "To be consistent, shouldn't you say that someone who is one-eighth white is passing as black?" or "Why is there so much concern, since the so-called blacks who pass take so little negroid ancestry with them?" Those who ask such questions need to realize that "passing" is much more a social phenomenon than a biological one, reflecting the nation's unique definition of what makes a person black. The concept of "passing" rests on the one-drop rule and on folk beliefs about race and miscegenation, not on biological or historical fact.
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/jefferson/mixed/onedrop.html
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)What exactly are the statutes of limitations on ancestry?
If you go back far enough, we're all from Africa.
If you go back far enough, we're all fish!
People in this country need a whopping dose of general science!
jakeXT
(10,575 posts)I haven't read it yet
Study: Many self-identified white people have some African ancestry
http://www.upi.com/Science_News/2014/12/22/Study-Many-self-identified-white-people-have-some-African-ancestry/5941419305079/
http://www.cell.com/ajhg/pdf/S0002-9297%2814%2900476-5.pdf
Rosa Luxemburg
(28,627 posts)jakeXT
(10,575 posts)WheelWalker
(8,955 posts)Response to Omaha Steve (Original post)
ann--- This message was self-deleted by its author.
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Great!
Even tho' my parents and my genes might indicate I am from northern European descent (Scotland)....and we all in the family have the physical traits that go with that.... I've decided:
I want to be Inuit!
This week anyway.
Next week..... maybe Arian!
I'm sure they will welcome me wholeheartedly.
BTW for the absurd humor impaired.
Veldrick
(73 posts)AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)KamaAina
(78,249 posts)I'm beginning to think her parents may be gray.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)But was it her long-form birth certificate?
Man from Pickens
(1,713 posts)She needs psych help, not a media frenzy. Whatever she was trying to get by posing as a black person, if she wants it bad enough that she will tell obvious lies in public and deny immutable facts about her own life - which she surely remembers, having lived it - then this is a mental illness.
Cleita
(75,480 posts)her parents and anyone else involved resolve this on their own and off my news outlets?
marshall
(6,665 posts)At most it proves those two people are her legal parents, and if there is a race/ethnicity noted then it proves how they identified themselves at the time. It does not prove that they are her biological parents, and it does not prove the ancestry behind any of them.
However I do think Delezal is dodging the real issue. She should stick to explaining coherently and directly why and how she identifies herself as black. I would also like to hear her explain what she thinks is the difference between black and African-American. I noted that Matt Lauer kept using the term African-American in his questions to her, and she consistently responded using the term black. That suggests to me that she sees some difference and I would like to hear her explanation of that.
cindyperry
(151 posts)dna test because she would swear it has been doctored or tampered with she is into the persecution complex thing or a con artist one leave her to it
Major Nikon
(36,827 posts)And you can't prove I don't have a Brazilian dollars in my bank account.
So there.
cloudbase
(5,514 posts)City Lights
(25,171 posts)MisterP
(23,730 posts)JustABozoOnThisBus
(23,340 posts)... sure, Rachel's AMERICAN birth certificate blames the Dolezals for her existence, but what about her KENYAN birth certificate?
A DNA test might give some hints, but I think it will prove that her ancestors were from AFRICA! Yeah, maybe 70,000 years ago, but still ...
840high
(17,196 posts)rocktivity
(44,576 posts)and needs psychological help.
rocktivity
heaven05
(18,124 posts)reveals itself, the more I'm sure she has some kind of problem(s) she needs to resolve and move on. She lied and is lying continually. Enough is enough. A white woman pretending to be black does smack of using privilege not afforded to all in this country as many have pointed out. It is a reflection of the american pathological obsession with race. She should not have done what she did. I'm 'mixed' race and after reading a couple of comments today related to that reality, I have to agree. She is wrong, in motivation and commission. No more to be said about this individual.
Vogon_Glory
(9,118 posts)All I know about Rachel Dolezal is that I'm sure she's not my biological sister.
Aside from that I have no opinion.
Historic NY
(37,449 posts)guess she was left on their door step in Montana.
Beacool
(30,247 posts)Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)alboe
(192 posts)medeak
(8,101 posts)n/t
medeak
(8,101 posts)OVERKILL. now she has a publicist. Just want it to go away.
Throd
(7,208 posts)sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)they'll beat their drums until the poor woman takes her own life in some really gruesome way. That would keep the story alive an extra couple of weeks at least.
LisaL
(44,973 posts)sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)bravenak
(34,648 posts)Really.