Japan’s Leaders Fret as Nuclear Shutdown Nears
Source: New York Times
Barring an unexpected turnaround, Japan on Saturday will become a nuclear-free nation for the first time in more than four decades, at least temporarily.
Japans leaders have made increasingly desperate attempts in recent months to avoid just such a scenario, trying to restart plants shut for routine maintenance and kept that way while they tried to convince a skittish public that the reactors were safe in the wake of last years nuclear catastrophe. But the government has run up against a crippling public distrust that recently found a powerful voice in local leaders who are orchestrating a rare challenge to Tokyos centralized power.
As the last of 50 functional commercial reactors is set to go offline Saturday, that local resistance to turning plants back on has confronted Japans leaders with a grim scenario: with the nations once vaunted balance of trade already deteriorating, they now face the looming prospect of summer power shortages that could drive still more factories to close or move abroad.
Halting all the reactors would be something like a group suicide, said Yoshito Sengoku, acting chief of the governing Democratic Partys policy committee.
Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/05/05/world/asia/japans-leaders-fret-as-nuclear-shutdown-nears.html?pagewanted=all
truthisfreedom
(23,148 posts)country.
obxhead
(8,434 posts)is because they have no alternative.
I feel all nuke plants should be shut down, but you must have something else in place.
I feel bad for all of Japan as they deal with this crisis that has global implications.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)On the positive side:
1) More conservation campaigns, like the ones that helped Japan cope with last year's power shortages. For example, reduced lighting last year on The Ginza, a section of Tokyo which is usually lit up like a mini-Las Vegas, helped to conserve a tremendous amount of electricity, as did half-lighting in offices and stores throughout eastern Japan.
2) More emphasis on alternative energy sources, including installation of solar panels and collectors on houses and other buildings.
3) Wider use of even more energy-efficient machines and appliances
On the negative side:
1) Greater use of fossil fuels to produce electricity, which means not only production of more CO2 and NOx, but also increases Japan's need to compete against other countries like China for coal, gas, and petroleum resources.
obxhead
(8,434 posts)Of course there are ways to deal with power shortages. We've done so in here in the US, one of the greediest power consumers in the world.
However, a sudden total shutdown of every nuke plant is HUGE. Simply turning off an extra light or tv for a few hours won't solve the dilemma of a serious power production shutdown.
Again, I think all nuke plants world wide (and I live 4 miles away from one) should be shut down, but Japan must be facing one hell of a dilemma. Alternatives are available, but they take time to construct. It must be done (globally) for all of us, but a scheduled replace/shutdown is a little different than what Japan is going through right now.
If only they never would have built the damn things (with our support) in the first place .
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)All the nukes are now shut off, and most have been off-line for several months, but we still have electric power here in Japan. You don't seem to realize the effect that a concerted conservation campaign can have on making sure that there are no blackouts. In last year's campaign, for example, it wasn't just a few people turning off a couple of lights-- individuals made a serious effort to turn off all electric appliances that were not in use, and paid close attention to notices posted by TEPCO about the region's generating capacity versus demand. But it didn't stop there-- major electricity consumers like stores and offices went to half lighting, and the biggest user of electric power in Japan, the JR railway system, even altered its timetables to reduce the number of trains that would be running during peak electrical demand.
Nihil
(13,508 posts)> You don't seem to realize the effect that a concerted conservation campaign
> can have on making sure that there are no blackouts.
That one sentence scares the crap out of the US utilities and, consequently,
out of their tame politicians and media outlets.
"Conservation" is one c-word that should be broadcast far & wide.
The fact that a technologically advanced population have been able to achieve
a major conservation programme without somehow retreating to the Dark Ages
is just too frightening for the "Consume! Consume! Consume!" folks.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)However, it is going to be taken off-line tomorrow.
AndyTiedye
(23,500 posts)Why should the people trust their government after all the assurances that nuclear power is safe, when it obviously isn't, and when neither the government nor the power companies were at all prepared to deal with an all too predictable disaster.
drm604
(16,230 posts)and the country still seems to be functioning. Am I missing something? Are there blackouts that I'm not aware of? Is that 50th the straw that will break the camel's back?
solarman350
(136 posts)I found a list here:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_power_stations_in_Japan#Nuclear
It appears that "austerity measures" and a heavier use of fossil fuels is the path Japan will take if they persist in a non-nuclear power policy. Germany is watching to see if their own plan to go non-nuclear by 2050 is a sound decision...as they rush into the sickening arms of the fossil fuel industry. Thermonuclear Fusion Reactor technology might be commercially available by then (2050). That's the hope of some at least.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)that produce electricity by burning garbage.