Democratic ex-Va. Sen. Jim Webb announces presidential bid
Source: CNN
Washington (CNN)Former Virginia Sen. Jim Webb announced his campaign for president Thursday.
Webb would become the fifth Democrat to join the primary contest, though in his announcement he did not say specifically that he was seeking the Democratic nomination.
Webb made the announcement on social media, linking to a lengthy letter on his website explaining why he wants to run.
"We need to shake the hold of these shadow elites on our political process," Webb wrote. "Our elected officials need to get back to the basics of good governance and to remember that their principal obligations are to protect our national interests abroad and to ensure a level playing field here at home."
Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2015/07/02/politics/jim-webb-2016-president-announcement/index.html
Erich Bloodaxe BSN
(14,733 posts)Since Webb is obviously to the right of Clinton, and if he draws any voters at all, will draw them from her.
brooklynite
(94,571 posts)...I don't think you're likely to see a shift.
TBF
(32,060 posts)just take votes away from Hillary. Go Bernie!
Recursion
(56,582 posts)He speaks to the aggrieved white working class.
Cha
(297,240 posts)Mr. NFTG @Kennymack1971 Follow
Uh huh: "Jim Webb: Democrats Need "White, Working People," Can't Rely On Black Votes After Obama http://ln.is/breakingnewsusa.com/ivcEi via @breakingnewsusa
5:02 AM - 1 Feb 2015
16 Retweets 2 favorites
http://theobamadiary.com/2015/02/01/a-tweet-or-two-225/
Yeah, Webb .. wouldn't want to be the person that the Black community would vote for, too.
rpannier
(24,329 posts)I don't disagree that it would be nice if the Democratic nominees at all levels received more white, working class votes. I can't figure out why so many vote Republican.
But, the rest of that statement is just baffling.
'Can't rely on black votes after Obama'?
The Democratic Party has relied on minority and disenfranchised voters for over sixty years.
What world is Webb living in?
Like to hear him explain that statement
Cha
(297,240 posts)liberalmike27
(2,479 posts)Why would any Democrat vote for either Republican Lincoln Chaffee, or Webb, in the primary. I would agree, however, that both will probably attract voters who might have chosen Hillary, with her "New Democrat" stances on things, shipping jobs abroad with TPP and her general support of trade agreements that hurt American workers, her pro warring stances, her generally corporate outlook on most things.
bucolic_frolic
(43,162 posts)uninspiring candidates
*YAWN*
The Velveteen Ocelot
(115,693 posts)KamaAina
(78,249 posts)pangaia
(24,324 posts)TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)We'll see where this goes.
7962
(11,841 posts)I also think most of his support would come from otherwise-Hillary voters.
karynnj
(59,503 posts)In the Senate. I would happily vote for Clinton over him if they were the only two choices.
Duppers
(28,120 posts)Webb was never a progressive Democratic Senator.
countryken
(114 posts)He did his part to oust George 'Macaca' Allen. I thank him for that, but he'd still be my 6th choice after Bernie, O'Malley, Hillary, Biden, and Chaffee. Webb is too much of a blue dog for me.
Just keep the Democratic race clean and respectful, and I'm okay with it.
Cha
(297,240 posts)karynnj
(59,503 posts)Oped after Kerry was the de facto nominee. He attacked JK BOTH on comments in 1972 that the WH knew the war was not winnable and on his 1990s work for reconciliation with Vietnam. For 30 years, he refused to haake hands with JK. JK in spite of this greatly helped him in 2006 even in the primary because he saw Webb as the best chance to get the seat.
Webb remained angry about Vietnam and often brought it up in the Senate and even on the SFRC. Beyond agreeing with JK, to me Webb's inability to get past what was a difference of opinion and treating JK as he did is troubling.
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)Cha
(297,240 posts)I don't like Webb.
KamaAina
(78,249 posts)I've got him, Hillary, Bernie, and O'Malley. Who's the fifth?
denvine
(800 posts)KamaAina
(78,249 posts)Chakab
(1,727 posts)restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)3catwoman3
(23,987 posts)...the only one.
7962
(11,841 posts)Proud Public Servant
(2,097 posts)onehandle
(51,122 posts)Ultimately endorsing Hillary.
Good news.
he will eventully endorse Bernie when he wins nomination.Webb and chafee are going to hit her on iraq.
Response to Robbins (Reply #13)
Hekate This message was self-deleted by its author.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)If and when VP Biden enters the race he will bring in some humor, he generally has a genuine lovable personality.
As to Sen. Webb, he brings in the more conservative wing of the party. One thing about the Democratic Party, we are colorful. LOL
Mass
(27,315 posts)http://www.webb2016.com/jim-webb-announces-candidacy-for-president/
We need a President who understands leadership, who has a proven record of actual accomplishments, who can bring about bipartisan solutions, who can bring people from both sides to the table to get things done. And that leader needs to gather the great minds of our society and bring them into a new Administration and give them direction and ask them to help us solve the monumental challenges that face us.
What should you ask for in your next President?
First, there is no greater responsibility for our President than the vital role of Commander in Chief.
...
I would not have been the President who used military force in Libya during the Arab Spring. ... The attack in Benghazi was inevitable in some form or another, as was the continuing chaos and the dissemination of large numbers of weapons from Qaddafis armories to terrorist units throughout the region.
And today I would not be the President to sign an executive order establishing a long-tem relationship with Iran if it accepts Irans acquisition of nuclear weapons. This Administration and those in Congress should be looking very hard at the actual terms of this agreement, which we on the outside cannot yet see or evaluate. They should also be questioning whether it is appropriate for such an important agreement to be signed without the specific, prior approval of the Congress
...
We will work with our NATO allies to restore stability in Europe, and with our friends in the Middle East, particularly Israel, our most stable partner and friend in the region, to reduce the cycle of violence and turmoil in that part of the world.
.
Beauregard
(376 posts)When I see the word "bipartisan," it makes me want to reach for my gun. Endorsing bipartisanship is giving up the struggle in advance.
7962
(11,841 posts)Theres really no difference in "bipartisan" and "negotiation". You cant get everything you want 100% of the time. Its like wanting a dollar an hr raise and refusing to accept anything lower than that. You end up with nothing
candelista
(1,986 posts)Cut the innuendo. It's creepy.
7962
(11,841 posts)You go on thinking you can get your way 100% of the time without any compromise. Thats living in a dream world. And yes, thats EXACTLY what the Tea Party people preach constantly. "No compromise!!!"
Live by that mantra and you end up with NOTHING. Jim Webb isnt the first one to talk about bipartisanship, Pres Obama has talked about it constantly.
Cha
(297,240 posts)Uh huh: "Jim Webb: Democrats Need "White, Working People," Can't Rely On Black Votes After Obama http://ln.is/breakingnewsusa.com/ivcEi via @breakingnewsusa
5:02 AM - 1 Feb 2015
16 Retweets 2 favorites
http://theobamadiary.com/2015/02/01/a-tweet-or-two-225/
Hekate
(90,690 posts)... will no doubt have words for our former Secretary of State. He's also Southern, so I am interested to what he has to say about that broad subject.
Good.
Robbins
(5,066 posts)Inless Biden decides to get in.And i think he won't.
BlueStater
(7,596 posts)bigwillq
(72,790 posts)I welcome Mr. Webb into the field.
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)Isn't he pro-Confederate flag and anti-Affirmative Action?
MADem
(135,425 posts)I wonder if they've polled all his wives, to see how they feel about those matters?
He'll probably pull the conversation to the right!
Oh well...it'll make the primaries interesting.
I will say one thing about Webb--I disagree with him on some things quite vehemently, but he is NOT STUPID. He has a quick mind, and he's always thinking. Some of the shit he thinks about (women's issues, that dumb ass racist flag) are dead WRONG, but his arguments are articulate in their horse-shittery!
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)Hubby read Sen. Webb's book. Marine's!
MADem
(135,425 posts)It's just that some of the things he's wrong about kick him down the list for me.
Like I said, if he mushed through to the general, I'd hold my nose and vote for him. It would be a reluctant vote but I'd do it nonetheless. The worst Democrat is better than the best Republican, after all!
cui bono
(19,926 posts)I haven't followed him closely, but I remember when he took the seat from "macaca" and he was everyone's hero at the time for that. Interesting about the flag, what's his problem with women's issues?
MADem
(135,425 posts)As I always say, the worst Dem is better than the best Republican.
He is a Civil War enthusiast, and that might color (pardon the expression) his "Heritage" POV. That said, it is an insensitive POV and he is unlikely to adjust it, because he has Civil War relatives and his "heritage" is more important than the offense of millions of others.
He has a shit reputation amongst people who support women in the Armed Services. He tried like hell to block admission of women to the Naval Academy, was against lifting of combat exclusion, and went out of his way to devalue, dismiss and denigrate women in uniform for the entire time he was associated with DOD (not just as SECNAV). I will tell you that virtually every single woman in uniform--and plenty of male allies--thought the guy was, to put it kindly and in as mild a term as I can come up with, a "fucking asshole." When he resigned as SECNAV, there were more than a few people who said "Don't let the door hit ya, ya bastard" -- notwithstanding some good ideas he had with regard to spending and deployment issues.
He was "set upon" in no uncertain terms by a group of 0-6 women from all branches of service at a senior female leadership get-together in DC many years back, and got his ass handed to him so badly he stopped taking questions. I received feedback from officers who were there who said it was nothing short of a donnybrook! He definitely left with a piece of their minds, and a piece of his ass missing--though I don't think he was moved to change his stances re: women, which were neanderthal on a good day.
He's just not terribly "progressive" when it comes to things he's not, I suspect (he's not a person of color, he's not a female, he's not poor, etc.). Still, he's better than any Republican. This is why I say if he made it to the general, I would painfully, reluctantly vote for him.
Cha
(297,240 posts)Uh huh: "Jim Webb: Democrats Need "White, Working People," Can't Rely On Black Votes After Obama http://ln.is/breakingnewsusa.com/ivcEi via @breakingnewsusa
5:02 AM - 1 Feb 2015
16 Retweets 2 favorites
http://theobamadiary.com/2015/02/01/a-tweet-or-two-225/
MADem
(135,425 posts)There's a shade of an insult in that comment and I have to say it rubbed me the wrong way....
Webb went on to say, You are not going to have a situation again where you have 96% of the African American vote turning out for one presidential candidate.
Cha
(297,240 posts)Why not be inclusive?
I think a big part of losing the Senate in 2014 were candidates running away from President Obama. The Dem candidate who wins the nom is going to want the President to campaign for them and with them, imo.. ie.. the Obama Coalition.
Something Webb evidently hasn't thought of since he seems to be so busy running away from him.
You are not going to have a situation again where you have 96% of the African American vote turning out for one presidential candidate. What makes him so bloody sure?
The President is more than about just being Black.. I don't care what ugly epithets people like Cornel West have to hurl.
Yeah, big dog whistle.. thanks for more of JW's quote, MADem
I'm liking this from Hillary..
Hillary: We must defend ObamaCare
riversedge http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=1131245
MADem
(135,425 posts)fill-in-your-favorite-ethnic-designation, then they're going to EARN (as opposed to "win," like you do on Wheel of Fortune) 96% of that bloc's vote.
I really do dislike the way he approaches issues--the rather dire "You can't count on the Black man, got to have those 'reliable' whites to close the deal" meme just doesn't sit too well with me.
Cha
(297,240 posts)Rather dumb, imo.
24601
(3,962 posts)Maryland & Missouri and that some Confederate soldiers were abolitionists. His focus was on historical use of the flag.
"Webb argued that the U.S. should preserve every part of its history, even the uncomfortable ones."
The Confederate Battle Flag has wrongly been used for racist and other purposes in recent decades, Webb said. It should not be used in any way as a political symbol that divides us.
This is a time for us to come together, and to recognize once more that our complex multicultural society is founded on the principle of mutual respect, he said.
Source: http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/246009-webb-defends-use-of-confederate-flag
Kelvin Mace
(17,469 posts)Museums are fine. Even Civil War battlefields. But not on state flags or on state legislatures.
24601
(3,962 posts)peacebird
(14,195 posts)Laser102
(816 posts)Not a good Democrat. Opposite of Bernie in a lot of ways.
Proud Public Servant
(2,097 posts)an ex-Reagan official? Where do I sign up?
onenote
(42,703 posts)Don't think it'll happen, though.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)kind of guy who would play second fiddle well.
MADem
(135,425 posts)TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)The cabinet at most is a consolation prize/peace offering post-election. I think he's serious, and probably has been planning this for a while.
MADem
(135,425 posts)A few presidential candidates have gone on to be SECSTATE (Clinton and Kerry, most notably) and six SECSTATES have later gone on to become POTUS (Jefferson, Madison, Monroe, JQ Adams, Buchanan, Van Buren)
Hell, they'll go through it for a good ambassadorship (London, Rome, Paris--the jewels in the crown, though you need to raise LOTS of PAC money to get one of those, usually). Adlai Stevenson, who ran for POTUS multiple times, ended up getting the UN ambassadorship under JFK.
GH Bush parlayed being a UN ambassador and the "envoy" to China before we had a formal ambassador there into qualification for the VP job--these jobs are stepping stones, and an easy way to shortcut your way into them is to run for office.
It's all about pumping up the national profile. Carly Fiorina doesn't really think she can win--she just wants to get in on the game.
The rarefied air is all good.
The cabinet is a "close to the throne" job that can be monetized after the term is up, and the scrutiny is far less intensive. There's clout, power, perks, and a fair amount of attention, but it's not unrelenting. It's a good gig, and it pays well.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)Fiorina wants VP, that's obvious. I seriously doubt anyone would put themselves through the horrific process of running for President for a cabinet position. It's not even that close to the throne, considering that Obama pretty much ignores his cabinet. Benny Rhodes and Valerie Jarret and McDonough run everything.
MADem
(135,425 posts)Obama won't BE President when the next cabinet is seated--the paradigm will shift yet again.
Every POTUS uses their staff differently. Dumbya delegated like hell and let his cabinet do all the heavy lifting day-to-day. One can't use today's working relationships to predict future ones--every President does it their own way. Some are delegators, others, micro-managers.
StevieM
(10,500 posts)the GOP chairmanship into the UN Ambassadorship. Those two positions made him seem like a credible candidate for president, which enabled him to come in second to Reagan in the 1980 primaries. Being GOP Chairman especially helped him organize in Iowa, which enabled him to win the caucuses in 1980, thereby establishing himself as the chief alternative to Reagan.
At the Convention, Reagan briefly contemplated a bizarre plan to make Gerald Ford the VP. When that proved unworkable, he turned to the runner-up from the primaries, George HW Bush.
MADem
(135,425 posts)associations into that envoy gig. His wife was able to amass one of the biggest rolodexes (she called it her "Christmas card list" in the history of electoral politics--that was a MASSIVE donor list, before the days when those things were computerized, too. Not only were his associated positions in service to government useful but that list was incredibly useful too (and he added to it, 'big time' when he was RNC chair)--he could go to the well with those names, and parlay his moneyraising influence into political influence, given his background.
Gerald Ford wanted to be "co-president" with Reagan, and Reagan still had enough in the way of marbles to tell him where he could stuff that notion. Apparently Ford was somewhat insistent, and Reagan was having none of it. It would have been absurd--no one steps BACKWARD from the White House, even if one gets there without a single vote. The only options post-WH are in non-elective capacity, like the Supreme Court (Taft). For awhile there, there was talk about Bill Clinton running the UN (which would have been a break with custom/tradition, as Security Council countries don't put up candidates for that gig) -- it got a bit of buzz but in the end it went nowhere.
Mass
(27,315 posts)read his campaign announcement.
peacebird
(14,195 posts)mattered
HFRN
(1,469 posts)and pointed out Miller for what he was, in the primary
then, after Webb won, last he ever mentioned the issue
MADem
(135,425 posts)If he gets the nomination, I will hold my nose and vote for him, but I do not care for his stances on a number of issues.
The worst Democrat is better than the best Republican, but he only gets a leg up because he was smart enough to jump ship from the GOP.
He also bores easily--couldn't handle more than one term in the Senate--do we need someone who has walked out on more than one job (SECNAV) in the Leader of the Free World seat?
His personal life is RIPE for excoriation, too--that should not matter...but it DOES.
Gloria
(17,663 posts)eom
tabasco
(22,974 posts)Competition is a good thing.
Webb's a good man.
Zambero
(8,964 posts)As far as military intervention goes. A centrist on economic issues however.
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)while eating into Bernie's populist support, or at least trying too.
Blech.
7962
(11,841 posts)geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)coalition of GLBT, African-American, Jewish, and Latino voters.
Call it a hunch.
7962
(11,841 posts)I just dont see it. But hey, who knows?
Recursion
(56,582 posts)Webb is already punching an economic fairness message.
Iliyah
(25,111 posts)Military background to boot. At this point in time I do see HRC's numbers remaining to the same tho.
Recursion
(56,582 posts)particularly the hawks. It's just an older and whiter coalition he's aiming for than a Democrat has for a while.
restorefreedom
(12,655 posts)i also think webb could draw from centrist/conservative dems and indys who will not want to vote for a woman president.
i am not a hrc fan, but i don't think dems can ignore that there are still "i will never vote for a woman" types. and they may not all be in the gop.
Nite Owl
(11,303 posts)Only thing in common with Bernie is he is anti war otherwise he is mostly a Republican.
summerschild
(725 posts)Ronald Reagan fan.
I heard a 20 minute interview. He spent 15 of them praising Reagan. It was disgusting.
We DON'T need this guy.
JudyM
(29,248 posts)CharlotteVale
(2,717 posts)Hillary Clinton look a lot more appealing.
msongs
(67,406 posts)Nite Owl
(11,303 posts)I'll read the letter because I can't imagine why in the world he is running.
pangaia
(24,324 posts)Blah, blah blah....
JudyM
(29,248 posts)But seriously, his campaign was part of our GOTV effort and I never felt he contributed much, just dipped in to the Senate to get some street cred.
YOHABLO
(7,358 posts)That's code for increasing military expenditures and boots on the the ground. He's way too hawkish. I would think the principle obligation is to the quality of life for the citizens of the U.S. He's too right of center for my taste.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)He was not/is not a member of the neocon tribe.
7962
(11,841 posts)Hillary would be the first woman president. I think she would have more of a hair trigger than anyone else because she'd be eager to show the world that even though she's a woman, she's not to be messed with.
TwilightGardener
(46,416 posts)to take out another regime somewhere. Unlike Madame "We Came We Saw He Died".
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)but they usually fail to mention that the goalposts are constantly being moved.
usregimechange
(18,373 posts)davidpdx
(22,000 posts)He's far too conservative for my taste, probably closer to Chafee. Webb and Chafee are going to have a hard time getting support to the right of Clinton.
Art_from_Ark
(27,247 posts)"Meh, meh, and double meh!"
Octafish
(55,745 posts)Guy's got integrity, compassion, leadership, and smarts.
TheNutcracker
(2,104 posts)of his staffer.
There were lots of questions, with no answers. The 'suicide' was weirder than weird. Not the usual way....and it was all 'quiet'.
Besides, he's to hawkish for me, like Hillary and Biden.
https://www.google.com/?gws_rd=ssl#q=death+of+Senator+Webb%27s+staffer
Kalidurga
(14,177 posts)Seriously in a week we are going to forget he is even a candidate.
cui bono
(19,926 posts)That's kind of weird...
I was wondering if any more Dems were going to run, still not sure I guess.
silvershadow
(10,336 posts)RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)Another third way corporatist!