NASA picks 4 astronauts to fly 1st commercial space missions
Source: Associated Press
NASA has selected four veteran astronauts to lead the way back into orbit from U.S. soil.
On Thursday, NASA Administrator Charles Bolden named the four who will fly on capsules built by private companies SpaceX and Boeing. Each astronaut has test pilot experience and has flown twice in space.
The commercial crew astronauts are: Air Force Col. Robert Behnken, until recently head of the astronaut office; Air Force Col. Eric Boe, part of shuttle Discovery's last crew; retired Marine Col. Douglas Hurley, pilot of the final shuttle crew; and Navy Capt. Sunita Williams, a two-time resident of the International Space Station.
<snip>
NASA said the four were chosen for their spaceflight experience. They have a combined total of more than 400 days in space, thanks largely to Williams' two station stints, and more than 85 hours of spacewalking time. Williams the world record-holder for most spacewalking time by a woman most recently lived on the orbiting lab in 2012.
<snip>
Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-picks-4-astronauts-fly-1st-commercial-space-180835965.html
heaven05
(18,124 posts)bananas
(27,509 posts)SpaxeX has been successfully flying to LEO and launching satellites since 2010.
SpaceX has been successfully supplying the ISS since 2012.
Here's a list of Falcon flights, a long line of successes, with just a few failures:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Falcon_9_and_Falcon_Heavy_launches
I stand corrected.
Baclava
(12,047 posts)"NASA still relies on Moscow to transport astronauts to the space station at roughly $70 million per seat. Lawmakers aren't happy about that, but they also aren't proposing to give enough money to NASA in fiscal 2016 to meet a 2017 target for resuming launches to the orbiting lab from U.S. soil."
Congress considers easing ban on Russian rocket engines
WASHINGTON -- Lawmakers are weighing whether to give the Defense Department more leeway to buy Russian engines that deliver the Pentagon's military and spy satellites into space.
http://www.floridatoday.com/story/tech/science/space/2015/07/09/congress-considers-easing-ban-on-russian-rocket-engines/29904491/
forsaken mortal
(112 posts)It won't be long before SpaceX can launch crew to space. Google for info on their manned Dragon capsule.
Baclava
(12,047 posts)Till then we can just watch the Russian Soyuz rocket launches
Beauregard
(376 posts)From the article:
malthaussen
(17,202 posts)Since NASA astronauts are trained and work at taxpayer's expense, using them in a private company's ventures is interesting. Are we being compensated for their work? Or are we rather paying SpaceX for the ride?
-- Mal
valerief
(53,235 posts)Adrahil
(13,340 posts)For now, all their missions will be serving NASA.
randys1
(16,286 posts)christx30
(6,241 posts)in the space travel or exploration business any more. I'd love to return to the time of Apollo and the shuttle program, but that's not going to happen any time soon.
It pisses me off too.
Red Mountain
(1,733 posts)Dated info. The current page lacks prices. If anybody has more recent numbers please share.
Apart from government contractors we don't have a space program. It's just a matter of who holds the contract. In the future SpaceX will be able to compete with the traditional players.
Reter
(2,188 posts)No NASA secrets.
randys1
(16,286 posts)Reter
(2,188 posts)A private company would gladly show us (for example) signs of life found on another planet or moon, because it would generate massive publicity and make them all wealthy.
randys1
(16,286 posts)build something wrong and astronauts die.
But I actually am one of those who is not entirely certain we have been told the whole truth about UFO's.
But that would be the last reason I would want ANY private or for profits involved in space travel.
For profits are pretty useless in everything other than maybe pharmaceutical invention or discovery, as the profit motive is so forceful.
I do enjoy watching the Big Foot shows from time to time and I watch all the UFO shows, the bad news about that is there is still not a single bit of undeniable evidence for either.
I did see a show on the science channel where the film by Patterson-Grimlin couldnt be faked because at the time it was done there simply was no way to have that kind of ape suit or whatever you call it.
So who knows
Adrahil
(13,340 posts)The only difference here is they are running the whole show, instaed of the missions being directly managed by NASA.
Capt.Rocky300
(1,005 posts)in his grave. He was vehemently opposed to cost cutting at NASA and allowing the privatization of space launches. So far, it seems he was right to be.
Red Mountain
(1,733 posts)truthisfreedom
(23,148 posts)It takes guts to be an astronaut and even more guts to start a rocket company. I'm proud of SpaceX and Elon Musk.