Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bananas

(27,509 posts)
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 02:35 PM Jul 2015

NASA picks 4 astronauts to fly 1st commercial space missions

Source: Associated Press

NASA has selected four veteran astronauts to lead the way back into orbit from U.S. soil.

On Thursday, NASA Administrator Charles Bolden named the four who will fly on capsules built by private companies — SpaceX and Boeing. Each astronaut has test pilot experience and has flown twice in space.

The commercial crew astronauts are: Air Force Col. Robert Behnken, until recently head of the astronaut office; Air Force Col. Eric Boe, part of shuttle Discovery's last crew; retired Marine Col. Douglas Hurley, pilot of the final shuttle crew; and Navy Capt. Sunita Williams, a two-time resident of the International Space Station.

<snip>

NASA said the four were chosen for their spaceflight experience. They have a combined total of more than 400 days in space, thanks largely to Williams' two station stints, and more than 85 hours of spacewalking time. Williams — the world record-holder for most spacewalking time by a woman — most recently lived on the orbiting lab in 2012.

<snip>


Read more: http://news.yahoo.com/nasa-picks-4-astronauts-fly-1st-commercial-space-180835965.html

21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
NASA picks 4 astronauts to fly 1st commercial space missions (Original Post) bananas Jul 2015 OP
Space X???!!!!! heaven05 Jul 2015 #1
Then either you don't read enough, or you're reading the wrong sources. bananas Jul 2015 #6
thanks heaven05 Jul 2015 #7
But SpaceX can't put a man in orbit, we use the Russians for that Baclava Jul 2015 #9
Dragon forsaken mortal Jul 2015 #12
Still a couple years away from any projected US manned test flights, if all goes well Baclava Jul 2015 #14
Here's why NASA gets to pick the astronauts. Beauregard Jul 2015 #2
Interesting jurisdictional question. malthaussen Jul 2015 #3
Are we being compensated for ExxonMobil's massive tax breaks? nt valerief Jul 2015 #13
The companies ate providing services to NASA. Adrahil Jul 2015 #17
Why private companies? What a bunch of bullshit randys1 Jul 2015 #4
Because the U.S. government isn't christx30 Jul 2015 #8
Price. SpaceX is doing it cheaper. Red Mountain Jul 2015 #11
Totally private is my goal Reter Jul 2015 #16
So you think NASA would keep secrets where a private for profit corp wouldnt? randys1 Jul 2015 #19
NASA has a reason to hide certain things Reter Jul 2015 #20
Oy, not sure where to go with that one. I thought you meant like when they fuck up and randys1 Jul 2015 #21
NASA has contracted the construction and support of spacecraft since the 60's Adrahil Jul 2015 #18
Neil Armstrong must be spinning...... Capt.Rocky300 Jul 2015 #5
Maybe but Buzz Aldrin is all for it....... Red Mountain Jul 2015 #10
Space travel is remarkably dangerous. truthisfreedom Jul 2015 #15
 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
1. Space X???!!!!!
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 02:37 PM
Jul 2015
All I read about is failure coming from that company. Done privatized space travel.....

bananas

(27,509 posts)
6. Then either you don't read enough, or you're reading the wrong sources.
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 03:18 PM
Jul 2015

SpaxeX has been successfully flying to LEO and launching satellites since 2010.
SpaceX has been successfully supplying the ISS since 2012.
Here's a list of Falcon flights, a long line of successes, with just a few failures:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Falcon_9_and_Falcon_Heavy_launches

 

Baclava

(12,047 posts)
9. But SpaceX can't put a man in orbit, we use the Russians for that
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 05:24 PM
Jul 2015

"NASA still relies on Moscow to transport astronauts to the space station at roughly $70 million per seat. Lawmakers aren't happy about that, but they also aren't proposing to give enough money to NASA in fiscal 2016 to meet a 2017 target for resuming launches to the orbiting lab from U.S. soil."


Congress considers easing ban on Russian rocket engines

WASHINGTON -- Lawmakers are weighing whether to give the Defense Department more leeway to buy Russian engines that deliver the Pentagon's military and spy satellites into space.

http://www.floridatoday.com/story/tech/science/space/2015/07/09/congress-considers-easing-ban-on-russian-rocket-engines/29904491/

forsaken mortal

(112 posts)
12. Dragon
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 06:42 PM
Jul 2015

It won't be long before SpaceX can launch crew to space. Google for info on their manned Dragon capsule.

 

Baclava

(12,047 posts)
14. Still a couple years away from any projected US manned test flights, if all goes well
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 08:43 PM
Jul 2015

Till then we can just watch the Russian Soyuz rocket launches






 

Beauregard

(376 posts)
2. Here's why NASA gets to pick the astronauts.
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 02:38 PM
Jul 2015

From the article:

NASA's contracts with SpaceX and Boeing for crew capsules — totaling nearly $7 billion — require at least one test flight with at least one NASA astronaut on board.

malthaussen

(17,202 posts)
3. Interesting jurisdictional question.
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 02:40 PM
Jul 2015

Since NASA astronauts are trained and work at taxpayer's expense, using them in a private company's ventures is interesting. Are we being compensated for their work? Or are we rather paying SpaceX for the ride?

-- Mal

christx30

(6,241 posts)
8. Because the U.S. government isn't
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 04:20 PM
Jul 2015

in the space travel or exploration business any more. I'd love to return to the time of Apollo and the shuttle program, but that's not going to happen any time soon.
It pisses me off too.

Red Mountain

(1,733 posts)
11. Price. SpaceX is doing it cheaper.
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 06:16 PM
Jul 2015
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Comparison_of_orbital_launch_systems&oldid=590182048

Dated info. The current page lacks prices. If anybody has more recent numbers please share.

Apart from government contractors we don't have a space program. It's just a matter of who holds the contract. In the future SpaceX will be able to compete with the traditional players.
 

Reter

(2,188 posts)
20. NASA has a reason to hide certain things
Fri Jul 10, 2015, 05:06 PM
Jul 2015

A private company would gladly show us (for example) signs of life found on another planet or moon, because it would generate massive publicity and make them all wealthy.

randys1

(16,286 posts)
21. Oy, not sure where to go with that one. I thought you meant like when they fuck up and
Fri Jul 10, 2015, 05:10 PM
Jul 2015

build something wrong and astronauts die.

But I actually am one of those who is not entirely certain we have been told the whole truth about UFO's.

But that would be the last reason I would want ANY private or for profits involved in space travel.

For profits are pretty useless in everything other than maybe pharmaceutical invention or discovery, as the profit motive is so forceful.

I do enjoy watching the Big Foot shows from time to time and I watch all the UFO shows, the bad news about that is there is still not a single bit of undeniable evidence for either.

I did see a show on the science channel where the film by Patterson-Grimlin couldnt be faked because at the time it was done there simply was no way to have that kind of ape suit or whatever you call it.

So who knows

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
18. NASA has contracted the construction and support of spacecraft since the 60's
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 11:42 PM
Jul 2015

The only difference here is they are running the whole show, instaed of the missions being directly managed by NASA.

Capt.Rocky300

(1,005 posts)
5. Neil Armstrong must be spinning......
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 02:58 PM
Jul 2015

in his grave. He was vehemently opposed to cost cutting at NASA and allowing the privatization of space launches. So far, it seems he was right to be.

truthisfreedom

(23,148 posts)
15. Space travel is remarkably dangerous.
Thu Jul 9, 2015, 08:58 PM
Jul 2015

It takes guts to be an astronaut and even more guts to start a rocket company. I'm proud of SpaceX and Elon Musk.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»NASA picks 4 astronauts t...