Psychologists Shielded U.S. Torture Program, Report Finds
Source: New York Times
Friday, July 10, 2015 3:43 PM EDT
The Central Intelligence Agencys health professionals repeatedly criticized the agencys post-Sept. 11 interrogation program, but their protests were rebuffed by prominent outside psychologists who lent credibility to the program, according to a sweeping new report.
The 542-page report, which examines the involvement of the nations psychologists and their largest professional organization, the American Psychological Association, with the harsh interrogation programs of the Bush era, raises repeated questions about the collaboration between psychologists and officials at both the C.I.A. and the Pentagon.
Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/11/us/psychologists-shielded-us-torture-program-report-finds.html?
jwirr
(39,215 posts)Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)I bet that was the primary reason why they collaborated.
Uncle Joe
(58,364 posts)http://www.nytimes.com/2015/07/11/us/psychologists-shielded-us-torture-program-report-finds.html?&_r=0
Two former presidents of the psychological association were members of a C.I.A. advisory committee, the report found. One of them provided the agency with an opinion that sleep deprivation did not constitute torture, and later held a small ownership stake in a consulting company founded by two men who oversaw the agencys interrogation program, it said.
The associations ethics director, Stephen Behnke, coordinated the groups public policy statements on interrogations with a top military psychologist, the report said, and then received a Pentagon contract to help train interrogators while he was still working at the association, without the knowledge of the associations board. Mr. Behnke did not respond to a request for comment.
(snip)
The C.I.A. and the Pentagon both conducted harsh interrogations during the administration of President George W. Bush, although the C.I.A.s program included more brutal tactics. Some of them, like the simulated drowning technique called waterboarding, are now widely regarded as torture. The agencys interrogations were done at so-called black site prisons around the world where prisoners were held secretly for years.
(snip)
The evidence supports the conclusion that A.P.A. officials colluded with D.O.D. officials to, at the least, adopt and maintain A.P.A. ethics policies that were not more restrictive than the guidelines that key D.O.D. officials wanted, the report says, adding, A.P.A. chose its ethics policy based on its goals of helping D.O.D., managing its P.R., and maximizing the growth of the profession.
Thanks for the thread, DonViejo.
bananas
(27,509 posts)US torture doctors could face charges after report alleges post-9/11 'collusion'
Spencer Ackerman
Friday 10 July 2015
The largest association of psychologists in the United States is on the brink of a crisis, the Guardian has learned, after an independent review revealed that medical professionals lied and covered up their extensive involvement in post-9/11 torture. The revelation, puncturing years of denials, creates the potential for leadership firings, loss of licenses and even prosecutions.
<snip>
Sources with knowledge of the report and its consequences, who requested anonymity to discuss the findings before public release, expected a wave of firings and resignations across the leadership of an organization that Hoffman finds used its extensive institutional links to the CIA and US military to facilitate abusive interrogations.
Several officials are likely to be sacked, including Stephen Behnke, the APAs ethics chief and a leading figure in recasting its ethics guidelines in a manner conducive to interrogations that, from the start, relied heavily on psychologists to design and implement techniques like waterboarding.
But the reckoning with psychologists institutional complicity in torture may not stop there.
<snip>
bucolic_frolic
(43,173 posts)Discovered by RICO
Don't miss the exciting fireworks!!
I hear RICO can really bring it!