Religious objections.

Keep that nonsense in a church, temple or whatever and at home.

It has no place in government or a business that deals with the general public and uses our taxpayer paid for roads and infrastructure.

I'm glad I'd be able to go into a store and get what I need without worrying about the clerk's religious objections. If I get a muslim clerk, can he stop me from buying a beer? If I get a Jewish clerk, can he stop me from buying ham? Can a Hindu cleark stop me from getting 2 pounds of ground beef?

The argument is always the same... that these treatments interrupt "God's will" when it comes to pregnancy.

I have never heard the same people argue that men shouldn't need Viagra (isn't their ED "God's will?) or against fertility treatments.

Keep the women barefoot and pregnant.... (/sarcasm).

I don't hear any objections to ED melds being covered by insurance

"...that saith to the wood, awake;..."

Habakkuk 2:19, KJV.

I've had some heated 'discussions' around this issue. One with a pharmacy student who didn't 'get it'...

This is very good news.

Thanks!

For example: If I claim that I find hunting morally objectionable, do I get to get a job in a sporting goods store and then refuse to sell hunting rifles? I suspect most people would tell me to quit the job.

If Pharmacists don't want to sell any drug for any reason, they should work in another field.

That young student didn't see the problem of a pharmacy refusing to sell birth control due to religious objections...and off we go! I could not stop myself...I finally had to walk away. Ugh!

........again......

Maybe they should just put it on a loop in the news ticker at the bottom of the screen.

reference. Doubt they'll have a bone to pick with that one.

I look forward to reading this opinion

I mean, is there a law that says they MUST carry these products?

If not, then this decision is just going to lead to certain pharmacies not ordering them anymore.

But at least at your 'big chain' types of places, the ones for whom individual employees 'preferences' about stuff like this won't matter ... (and hence, these products WILL be stocked, because there's money to be made), the corporate office isn't going to tolerate employees breaking federal law ... so ... at least occasionally the outcome will be different as a result of this case, and women will get the care they deserve. So there is that!

They could choose not to stock a product and still be forced to order it if the customer has a prescription.

No, I don't think they can. Or if they don't actively stock it, they must order it upon being presented with a valid prescription.

Licensure is to protect the consumer, from shit like this.