Court Upholds NLRB Union-Organizing Rule
Source: WSJ
Move is blow to several business trade groups that sued to block it
By MELANIE TROTTMAN
A federal-district court has upheld a National Labor Relations Board rule that is expected to speed union-organizing elections, a blow to several business trade groups that sued to block it.
The rule allows petitions and other documents to be filed electronically instead of by mail and generally delays employer legal challenges to elections until after workers have cast their votes. It also requires employers to provide unions with personal email addresses of workers they have on file.
Plaintiffs, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce, filed suit early this year to block the rule, alleging it overstepped the boards authority and violated federal law by curbing an employers right to communicate with employees about the organizing process. Congressional Republicans likewise said the rule could limit the time employers have to counter union-organizing campaigns.
FULL story at link.
Read more: http://www.wsj.com/articles/court-upholds-nlrb-union-organizing-rule-1438291067
Gman
(24,780 posts)Yet claim to be some sort of progressive that Obama has done nothing for organized labor. Now I'm well aware that if I were to point out this case, the response will be that Obama didn't do this. A court and the NLRB did. (They generally aren't aware of the NLRB anyway.).
For those unknowing, it's impossible to overstate how big a victory this is. If you've ever worked an organizing campaign, you know.
Omaha Steve
(99,659 posts)The only time it had a setback was when R's wouldn't confirm his appointees.
Gman
(24,780 posts)literally any Democrat is the only option next year. There is no other alternative. Hillary would do just fine. Sanders would be great too. O'Malley, Biden, Joe the elected Democrat dog catcher in Possum Kingdom, Texas. Any Democrat.
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)We're going to need this if Friedrichs vs. CTA goes bad.