Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

bananas

(27,509 posts)
Fri Jul 31, 2015, 08:57 AM Jul 2015

Iran's foreign minister calls for world's nuclear weapons states to disarm

Source: Guardian

Iran’s foreign minister, Mohammad Javad Zarif, has called on Israel and the world’s eight other states with nuclear weapons to begin disarming, in response to his country’s acceptance of strict curbs on its nuclear programme in an agreement reached earlier this month.

Writing in the Guardian, Zarif argues that by agreeing to the Vienna deal, titled the joint comprehensive plan of action, Iran was honouring the spirit of the nuclear non-proliferation treaty (NPT), in which states without nuclear weapons promise not to acquire them. But he says the nuclear weapons states are not keeping their side of the bargain by disarming.

<snip>

Zarif makes three proposals: for negotiations to begin on a nuclear weapons elimination treaty; that this should lead initially to nuclear arsenals being taken off high alert readiness (for example, by removing warheads from missiles); and for the creation of a zone in the Middle East free of weapons of mass destruction.

However, efforts to agree on further steps towards disarmament and the creation of a WMD-free zone in the region failed at a global conference in May to reinvigorate the NPT, which ended in acrimony. With his commentary, Zarif is signalling Iran’s willingness, with the Vienna deal under its belt and as the current chairman of the Non-Aligned Movement (a group that still functions on nuclear issues), to take on the leadership of the campaigns for disarmament and the WMD-free zone.

<snip>

Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jul/31/iran-nuclear-weapons-states-disarm-israel

35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Iran's foreign minister calls for world's nuclear weapons states to disarm (Original Post) bananas Jul 2015 OP
Isn't the logical solution to too many nuclear weapons an easy one.. MORE nuclear weapons? Fred Sanders Jul 2015 #1
Iran has signed a historic nuclear deal – now it’s Israel’s turn (by Javad Zarif) bananas Jul 2015 #2
May be if Iran's leaders leftynyc Jul 2015 #4
That was from February, 5 months before this deal. Has there been any such talk from Iran since 4lbs Jul 2015 #6
So what? leftynyc Jul 2015 #9
Yes, and the deal cements Iran as one-year breakout power for ten years, zero-day breakout after. bananas Jul 2015 #7
I'm agnostic on the deal leftynyc Jul 2015 #10
If Israel didn't consistently engage in behaviors such as this cpwm17 Jul 2015 #8
Spare me the complete bullshit leftynyc Jul 2015 #11
Hamas and Hezbollah both started in response to Israel's atrocious behavior. cpwm17 Jul 2015 #14
Defending terrorists leftynyc Jul 2015 #17
Defending far right-wing racist-apartheid Israel is par for the course around here. cpwm17 Jul 2015 #20
So now I'm a racist leftynyc Jul 2015 #29
"Iran hasn't started a war in over 200 years.' Sure.. EX500rider Jul 2015 #21
You do realize that most of your examples are from 160+ years ago, when Iran was Persia TiberiusB Jul 2015 #26
Some one stated that Iran hadn't started a war in over 200 yrs....I disagreed. EX500rider Jul 2015 #27
And you were right, technically... TiberiusB Jul 2015 #33
It is disingenuous (at best) to take what EVERYONE knows are lies for the mullahs The Stranger Jul 2015 #12
I think it's lovely of you leftynyc Jul 2015 #13
I think it's fine for Israel to defend itself. But here's the thing... Adrahil Jul 2015 #15
Utter and complete bullshit leftynyc Jul 2015 #18
Yeah, I'm worried about YOUR nerves. Adrahil Jul 2015 #19
Tough leftynyc Jul 2015 #23
Remember when Israel bombed Iraq? TiberiusB Jul 2015 #25
Yeah, it is disingenuous TiberiusB Jul 2015 #22
And more Germans died in WWII leftynyc Jul 2015 #24
How does that make even the slightest bit of sense? TiberiusB Jul 2015 #34
If OUR leaders didn't sing "Bomb Iran" we might have credibility on this topic. arcane1 Jul 2015 #28
You mean one senator who leftynyc Jul 2015 #30
Our hypocrisy ruins our credibility n/t arcane1 Jul 2015 #31
Is this where we pretend only John McCain wants war with Iran? TiberiusB Jul 2015 #35
Shit like saying they'll kick Israel's ass if Israel attacks them? Scootaloo Jul 2015 #32
And here in one sentence is why Netanyahu does not want the Iran treaty signed. jwirr Jul 2015 #3
LOL. Iran isn't a smoking radioactive crater, so I guess Israel has been able TwilightGardener Jul 2015 #5
Okay, Western hypocrite nuclear powers, your turn. Comrade Grumpy Jul 2015 #16

bananas

(27,509 posts)
2. Iran has signed a historic nuclear deal – now it’s Israel’s turn (by Javad Zarif)
Fri Jul 31, 2015, 09:17 AM
Jul 2015

Here's the opinion piece:

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2015/jul/31/iran-nuclear-deal-israel-vienna-treaty-middle-east-wmd

Iran has signed a historic nuclear deal – now it’s Israel’s turn

Javad Zarif

If the Vienna deal is to mean anything, the whole of the Middle East must rid itself of weapons of mass destruction

Friday 31 July 2015 06.34 EDT

We – Iran and its interlocutors in the group of nations known as the P5+1 – have finally achieved the shared objective of turning the Iranian nuclear programme from an unnecessary crisis into a platform for cooperation on nuclear non-proliferation and beyond. The nuclear deal reached in Vienna this month is not a ceiling but a solid foundation on which we must build. The joint comprehensive plan of action, as the accord is officially known, cements Iran’s status as a zone free of nuclear weapons. Now it is high time that we expand that zone to encompass the entire Middle East.

Iran’s push for a ban on weapons of mass destruction in its regional neighbourhood has been consistent. The fact that it precedes Saddam Hussein’s systematic use of WMDs against Iran (never reciprocated in kind) is evidence of the depth of my country’s commitment to this noble cause. And while Iran has received the support of some of its Arab friends in this endeavour, Israel – home to the Middle East’s only nuclear weapons programme – has been the holdout. In the light of the historic nuclear deal, we must address this challenge head on.

<snip>

For too long, it has been assumed that the insane concept of mutually assured destruction would sustain stability and non-proliferation. Nothing could be further from the truth. The prevalence of this deterrence doctrine in international relations has been the primary driving force behind the temptation by some countries to acquire nuclear weapons, and by others to engage in expanding and beefing up the strength of their nuclear arsenals. All this in blatant violation of the disarmament objectives set by the international community.

<snip>

One step in the right direction would be to start negotiations for a weapons elimination treaty, backed by a robust monitoring and compliance-verification mechanism.

This could, in an initial phase, occasion the de-alerting of nuclear arsenals (removing warheads from delivery vehicles to reduce the risk of use) and subsequently engender the progressive disarmament by all countries possessing such WMDs. It is certainly a feasible goal to start this global project with a robust, universal and really genuine push to establish a WMD-free zone in the Middle East, if the relevant powers finally come to deem it not just a noble cause but a strategic imperative.

<snip>


 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
4. May be if Iran's leaders
Fri Jul 31, 2015, 10:20 AM
Jul 2015

would quit shit like this:

https://www.middleeastmonitor.com/news/middle-east/17144-iran-threatens-to-destroy-israel-in-less-than-10-minutes

then Israel wouldn't feel it needs such weapons in their pocket. If Israel didn't have nukes, they'd be destroyed by now.

4lbs

(6,858 posts)
6. That was from February, 5 months before this deal. Has there been any such talk from Iran since
Fri Jul 31, 2015, 10:55 AM
Jul 2015

the deal?

I do know that Israel has been acting petulant ever since the deal was announced. One would think they would greet this deal warmly, but no.

However, it is understandable, since their main reason for leeching $3 billion from the US annually is almost gone.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
9. So what?
Fri Jul 31, 2015, 11:24 AM
Jul 2015

You think this clown has changed his mind? I think it's adorable you think Congress is going to cut aid to Israel when, in fact, it's probably going to go up.

bananas

(27,509 posts)
7. Yes, and the deal cements Iran as one-year breakout power for ten years, zero-day breakout after.
Fri Jul 31, 2015, 11:03 AM
Jul 2015

And that's assuming they don't covertly build any underground military nuclear facilities, like they've already done twice.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
10. I'm agnostic on the deal
Fri Jul 31, 2015, 11:26 AM
Jul 2015

The part where they get 24 days to hide evidence of nuclear work is ridiculous. But I also know the Europeans can't wait to get their hands on lucrative deals with Iran so sanctions would have been lifted anyway. It was probably the best deal that could have gotten signed. But I'll NEVER trust the Iranians as long as their mullahs are in charge. NEVER.

 

cpwm17

(3,829 posts)
8. If Israel didn't consistently engage in behaviors such as this
Fri Jul 31, 2015, 11:13 AM
Jul 2015

then people wouldn't be so incline to speak so poorly of Israel:



The Israeli soldiers murdered the person that greeted them at the door and then used some of the occupants as human shields:




http://electronicintifada.net/blogs/rania-khalek/israeli-army-uses-gaza-children-human-shields

First, the Israeli soldiers shot dead his 65-year-old father Muhammad Qdeih near the entrance of the home as he tried to alert the soldiers to the presence of women and children while carrying a white flag.

Next, says Qdeih, the soldiers forcibly positioned members of his family, including the children, at the windows of his home and proceeded to fire from behind them.

“They ordered us to take off our clothes and tied our hands up,” says Qdeih. “They took us to one of the rooms and used us as shields, making us stand at the windows as if we were looking outside. I was at one window and three children from my family at another. The soldiers then began firing around us.”


Actions speak louder than words. Iran hasn't started a war in over 200 years. They (and almost the entire world) don't have the war culture of the Israelis or right-wing Americans.

Israeli politicians start wars as a reelection strategy. Israelis are now trying very hard to get the US to start an unprovoked war against Iran.
 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
11. Spare me the complete bullshit
Fri Jul 31, 2015, 11:27 AM
Jul 2015

about Iran not starting any wars. They are the principal financers of hamas, hezbollah, islamic jihad. Trying to turn them into kittens just makes you look pretty foolish.

 

cpwm17

(3,829 posts)
14. Hamas and Hezbollah both started in response to Israel's atrocious behavior.
Fri Jul 31, 2015, 11:40 AM
Jul 2015

Hezbollah can be congratulated for ending Israel's occupation of southern Lebanon, which was their right. I know who were the bad guys in that conflict.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
17. Defending terrorists
Fri Jul 31, 2015, 01:01 PM
Jul 2015

Defending hamas and hizbollah? That's what this place has come to? That's pathetic.

 

cpwm17

(3,829 posts)
20. Defending far right-wing racist-apartheid Israel is par for the course around here.
Fri Jul 31, 2015, 01:20 PM
Jul 2015

Fortunately most people here don't agree with you, but strangely, you are able to promote your extreme racism and not get banned.

That appears to be a form of white privilege: Israel can brutalize brown Muslims, and the victims are to blame.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
29. So now I'm a racist
Fri Jul 31, 2015, 02:22 PM
Jul 2015

because I think hamas and hezbollah are terrorist organizations. I guess that makes sense to you. And this is why nobody of any power has anything to do with DU. We're done here.

EX500rider

(10,849 posts)
21. "Iran hasn't started a war in over 200 years.' Sure..
Fri Jul 31, 2015, 01:32 PM
Jul 2015

....if you don't count all of these:

Georgian-Persian War-(1795-1796)-After consolidating his power, Agha Mohammed invaded the Caucasian kingdom of Georgia, which had previously been a part of the Persian Empire, but had broken away following the death of Nadir Shah in 1747. Persian forces invaded Georgia and defeated the Georgian King Heraclius.

Afghan-Persian War-(1798)-The new Shah of Persia, Fath Ali, supported a pretender to the Afghan throne against the Afghan King. The pretender, Muhammad Barakzai overthrew his brother, Zaman, with help from an invading Persian army.

Afghan-Persian War-(1816)-Persia invaded Afghanistan and occupied the western Afghan city of Herat. Local Afghan guerrillas forced the Persians to exit Afghanistan.

Turkish-Persian War-(1821-1823)-The regime of Crown Prince Abbas Mirza launched an attack on Ottoman Turkey due to Turkish aid to Azerbaijani rebels in Persia. The rebels had fled from Persia and were given refuge by the Ottomans. The war opened with a Persian invasion of Turkey in the Lake Van region, and a counter-invasion by the Ottoman Pasha of Baghdad (Iraq belonged to the Ottoman Empire), who invaded western Persia. This invasion force was driven back across the border, but the newly modernized Persian army of 30,000 troops defeated 50,000 Ottoman Turks in the Battle of Erzurum near Lake Van in 1821. A peace treaty in 1823 ended the war with no changes to their mutual border.

Russo-Persian War --(1825-1828)--This war resulted from the ongoing border disputes arising from the Treaty of Gulistan (1813) between Persia and Russia. Persian forces were initially successful, capturing the Georgian capital of Tbilisi in 1825. Russian forces led by General Ivan Fedorovich Paskievich went on the offensive against the invading Persians and defeated them at the Battle of Ganja (also known as the Battle of Kirovabad) on September 26, 1826.

Afghan-Persian War-(1836-1838)-Persia invaded Afghanistan partly in response to Britain's influence in the region, and laid siege to the western Afghan city of Herat. The Herat defenders were aided by a British military advisor named Eldred Potter. Potter offered his services to the Afghans and set about organizing the city's defenses. Persian assaults on the city failed, and the invading army gave up the siege (September 28, 1838), and returned home.

Afghan/Anglo-Persian War-(1855-1857)-Persia again invaded Afghanistan, this time successfully capturing Herat. This upset the British, who claimed influence over Afghanistan. The British Empire declared war on Persia (Nov. 1, 1856), and proceeded to invade Persia both by sea and by land. British forces landed and took the Persian port of Bushire in January, 1857.

Dhofar War-(1973-1975)--Iran sent troops to Oman to aid the Sultan of Oman, who was fighting against Marxist rebels aided by South Yemen. The Shah of Iran reportedly wanted to not only support a fellow pro-Western Gulf Monarch, but also wanted to give his troops combat experience in the field.

And lately we have ongoing support for the Assads in Syria, Hezbollah in Lebanon, Hamas in Gaza and Shia rebels in Yemen.

TiberiusB

(490 posts)
26. You do realize that most of your examples are from 160+ years ago, when Iran was Persia
Fri Jul 31, 2015, 02:05 PM
Jul 2015

Thanks for making it clear that Iran has not, in fact, started a war in anything close to recent history.

The Dhofar War wasn't started by Iran.

TiberiusB

(490 posts)
33. And you were right, technically...
Fri Jul 31, 2015, 05:29 PM
Jul 2015

...but the claim that Iran hasn't started a war in several centuries was made to counter the assertion that Iran is currently actively starting wars, which apparently includes anything and everything involving Hamas or Hezbollah.

Not to mention that the difference between 160+ years and 200+ in a discussion about Iran as a present day threat seems a bit like splitting hairs.

The Stranger

(11,297 posts)
12. It is disingenuous (at best) to take what EVERYONE knows are lies for the mullahs
Fri Jul 31, 2015, 11:30 AM
Jul 2015

and try to use it to try to scare others and undermine good people seeking peace in the world, especially in this forum.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
13. I think it's lovely of you
Fri Jul 31, 2015, 11:34 AM
Jul 2015

to ask the Israeli's to not believe what's right in front of their faces and trust the mullahs. Nothing disingenuous about believing actual quoted people - unless it's against the Israeli's apparently. Are you also going to use the ridiculous argument that Iran hasn't started a war in 20 years while at the same time knowing they are the financial backers of hamas, hezbollah (who blew up our Marines in Lebanon) and islamic jihad? Should Israel forget those FACTS also? Is it disingenuous to bring that up also?

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
15. I think it's fine for Israel to defend itself. But here's the thing...
Fri Jul 31, 2015, 12:31 PM
Jul 2015

Half (or more) of the shit we are involved in over there would not be happening if we weren't acting in Israel's interests.

Israel should act in its OWN interests, and we should act in OURS.

Right now it is in OUR interests to come to a deal with Iran, because the only realistic alternatives to that are that they will develop a bomb, or we will be at war.

I'm not sure the deal will prevent a war with Iran, but I goddamned sure that no deal will practically guarantee one, and I am fucking sick of pouring money and blood into that region.

If Israel wants a war with Iran, it can fight it by itself AFAIC.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
18. Utter and complete bullshit
Fri Jul 31, 2015, 01:06 PM
Jul 2015

If you remember back to the first Iraq war, while Israel had scud missiles raining down on them, the US specifically asked Israel not to respond - and they didn't. So much for acting in Israel's interests. We went back to Iraq because sadaam tried to kill W's daddy - and for no other reason. We're there at all for oil - and for no other reason. Those of you trying to blame Israel for our military industrial complex work my last fucking nerve.

 

Adrahil

(13,340 posts)
19. Yeah, I'm worried about YOUR nerves.
Fri Jul 31, 2015, 01:19 PM
Jul 2015

I'm personally tired of funneling them Billions of dollars every year just to have their leader insert himself into our internal politics. We fund a big hunk of their military, while they provide universal health care for their citizens. Oh yeah, and give us the middle finger while they continue to expand settlements and slow walk action against illegal settlements.

And yeah, asking them not to respond WAS in their interests, since Iraq was PRAYING they would respond and sink the coalition. WE provided them with a lot of air defense on our for that (and Iron Dome has lots of American dollars in it too).

And yeah, we ARE targeted by many jihadists for our continual propping up of Israel.

I'm done with them, personally.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
23. Tough
Fri Jul 31, 2015, 01:55 PM
Jul 2015

I don't give a shit what you're worried about. Blaming Israel for our adventures in the middle east is dishonest bullshit. If you want to talk about foreign aid, that's an entirely different argument. I detest bibi and all he stands for but that doesn't mean you get to lie about bullshit like we're in the middle east on behalf of Israel.

TiberiusB

(490 posts)
25. Remember when Israel bombed Iraq?
Fri Jul 31, 2015, 02:02 PM
Jul 2015

10 years prior, Israel bombed the Osirak nuclear plant in Iraq, killing approximately 11 people without any consequences.

The scud attack killed 2-3 people. That doesn't justify the attack, but it does, once again, put the lie to the notion that Israel is going to get wiped out any time soon while they freely kill whomever, wherever, and whenever they please in far greater numbers whenever it suits them.

Care to discuss the U.S.S. Liberty?

TiberiusB

(490 posts)
22. Yeah, it is disingenuous
Fri Jul 31, 2015, 01:46 PM
Jul 2015

You nicely exclude any and all crimes by Israel, so yeah, it is completely disingenuous.

The mullahs can make all the speeches they want. It's never been more than propaganda at most. When, in the last 50 years, has any attack on Israel ever come even remotely close to imperiling the nation?

It is ridiculous to say that Iran hasn't started a war in 20 years because they haven't started one since they were considered Persia, nearly 200 years ago. You can try and conflate state sponsored terrorism with starting a war, but it isn't nearly the same thing. Just ask any sitting US president going back to Kennedy (and probably further, actually). Consider the Nicaraguan Contras, to pluck one of the most notorious examples from recent U.S. history. More people die in the U.S. every year from firearm related incidents than have died in Israel from all terrorist attacks combined in it's entire history. In fact, the number of Palestinians killed by Israel since it's creation far and away outstrips the number of Israelis. Do I need to go into the amount of Israeli land occupied by Palestinians, or how many time Gaza and the West Bank have invaded Israel and bombed whole neighborhoods? It's super easy to count to zero. Israel doesn't need nuclear weapons. They have the 11th most powerful army in the world and are completely backed by the U.S., currently ranked at #1. Iran is 12 places lower at #23. Iran will never risk anything more than a proxy conflict at most. If they want nuclear weapons (which no one has proven with any evidence beyond hateful rhetoric and ...well...that's it), it's as a deterrent to the very real threats coming from Israel and the U.S. GOP (and too many Democrats), who undoubtedly despise the notion of any lose of power in the Mid East, particular in the face of new Russian and Chinese alliances in the region.

Israel has every right to defend itself, but Israel doesn't get a pass just because it's Israel. Collective punishment and civilian bombing and land and resource theft are crimes no matter which nation commits them. Just Google Israeli deaths vs Palestinian deaths for some perspective and then come back and argue that it's totally okay to kill hundreds of civilians, including children, to exact revenge for the loss of even one Israeli life.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
24. And more Germans died in WWII
Fri Jul 31, 2015, 01:58 PM
Jul 2015

than Americans - what a fucking ridiculous argument to make. If hamas and their pals wouldn't store weapons behind women and children, we wouldn't be having this discussion. Let's all remember if they had taken the deal given to them in 1947 instead of starting a war, they'd have a country instead of a garbage pit in gaza. It's their own fault.

TiberiusB

(490 posts)
34. How does that make even the slightest bit of sense?
Fri Jul 31, 2015, 05:59 PM
Jul 2015

The discussion was about supposed threats to Israel in the Middle East, specifically Iran and it's support for groups like Hezbollah. My point is 100% dead on. Palestinians have more to fear from Israel than Israel has to fear from the Palestinians. No amount of stored munitions hidden away in Gaza is going to topple Israel or result in massive casualties. Again, this isn't to let the leadership of Hamas off the hook. They essentially exploit the civilian population to provoke Israel, knowing full well what will happen. Increasingly, however, it seems Israel is almost eager to play along, taking every opportunity to aggravate the problem, whether through military action as in Gaza, or through the continued appropriation of land to further construct illegal settlements on the West Bank.

The fact that the U.S. protects Israel even in the face of massive international criticism is certainly not lost on the Arab community, many of whom already see the U.S. as a dishonest broker, interested only in profit and empire.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
30. You mean one senator who
Fri Jul 31, 2015, 02:22 PM
Jul 2015

was running for President? That's what you think ruins our credibility? Whatever.

TiberiusB

(490 posts)
35. Is this where we pretend only John McCain wants war with Iran?
Fri Jul 31, 2015, 06:02 PM
Jul 2015

Hoooo-kay then...

Google "GOP war with Iran", then try again...

 

Scootaloo

(25,699 posts)
32. Shit like saying they'll kick Israel's ass if Israel attacks them?
Fri Jul 31, 2015, 03:12 PM
Jul 2015

Oh yes. The horror. The horror.

By the way, your Candidate has threatened to obliterate Iran, if Iran should attack Israel.



obliterate
verb oblit·er·ate \ə-ˈbli-tə-ˌrāt, ō-\
: to destroy (something) completely so that nothing is left

TwilightGardener

(46,416 posts)
5. LOL. Iran isn't a smoking radioactive crater, so I guess Israel has been able
Fri Jul 31, 2015, 10:53 AM
Jul 2015

to restrain itself thus far--as well as the US. Let's see if Iran complies fully and doesn't cheat over the next ten years before they start making demands of other countries to disarm.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Iran's foreign minister c...