Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
Fri Jul 31, 2015, 11:57 AM Jul 2015

Court Rules Police Need a Warrant to Access Location Data From Your Cellphone

Source: Slate

Take a moment and try to remember where you were 24 hours ago. Maybe you’re a creature of habit and it’s easy to guess. Or maybe, like me, you can’t quite recall whether you were at work, at home, or somewhere in between. Either way, if you had your cellphone with you, it would be astonishingly easy for someone with the right access to pin your location down. Thanks to a recent court decision, however, that information just got a lot harder to examine for many in the United States.

In an order released Thursday by the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California, Judge Lucy Koh found that Fourth Amendment protections extend to location data generated by cellphones. Ruling against the federal government, Koh affirmed that law enforcement agencies must seek a warrant before acquiring historical location data produced by a cellphone.

As Koh explains, modern phones constantly ping cellular towers, even when they’re not actively in use. Thanks to these regular connections, they generate a steady stream of data about their physical location—sometimes even when the user turns off location services, a fact that the ACLU stressed in an amicus brief. Koh notes that many users may be unaware of how much information they’re giving up as they move through the world. This data, which is known as cell site location information (or CSLI) can be important to legal investigations.

In the past, courts have largely avoided the issue of whether CSLI should be readily available. Koh writes, “Neither the U.S. Supreme Court nor the Ninth Circuit has squarely addressed whether cell phone users possess a reasonable expectation of privacy in the CSLI, historical or otherwise, associated with their cell phones.”

Read more: http://www.slate.com/blogs/future_tense/2015/07/31/a_court_ruled_that_fourth_amendment_protections_extend_to_location_data.html

8 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Court Rules Police Need a Warrant to Access Location Data From Your Cellphone (Original Post) onehandle Jul 2015 OP
This could be an important ruling Gothmog Jul 2015 #1
Why my phone is OFF unless I'm using it. hobbit709 Jul 2015 #2
I wonder if this applies to cars with GPS. n/t OnlinePoker Jul 2015 #3
If the cops are above board, christx30 Jul 2015 #4
Too bad they didn't apply it in general seabeckind Jul 2015 #5
The fact that they limit the power of the gov't but not the corporations Android3.14 Jul 2015 #6
CUE THE VONAGE THEME! rocktivity Jul 2015 #7
oh, SEEK but not OBTAIN a warrant ?! BadgerKid Aug 2015 #8

christx30

(6,241 posts)
4. If the cops are above board,
Fri Jul 31, 2015, 12:13 PM
Jul 2015

actually tracking suspects that have commited actual crimes, this shouldn't be a big deal for them. "Your honor, this guy robbed a bank and shot a guard. We need to arrest him so he can't hurt anyone, and for that, we need to know where he is." If the cops aren't doing anything wrong, then there is no need for them to worry about going to a judge for the go ahead.

seabeckind

(1,957 posts)
5. Too bad they didn't apply it in general
Fri Jul 31, 2015, 12:15 PM
Jul 2015

and not just to gov't agencies.

I have no doubt my phone is telling every business I pass that I'm on the move.

 

Android3.14

(5,402 posts)
6. The fact that they limit the power of the gov't but not the corporations
Fri Jul 31, 2015, 12:37 PM
Jul 2015

Is just more proof that we need a fundamental restructuring of the U.S. economy.

I wonder if Bernie or Hillary would support protecting private information from government and corporate snooping.

rocktivity

(44,577 posts)
7. CUE THE VONAGE THEME!
Fri Jul 31, 2015, 01:01 PM
Jul 2015

Last edited Sat Aug 1, 2015, 12:30 AM - Edit history (1)

I have no problems with domestic spying -- I have only have problems with domestic spying without a warrant.


rocktivity

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Court Rules Police Need a...