Appellate Panel Says Texas ID Law Broke U.S. Voting Rights Act
Source: New York Times
A federal appeals panel ruled Wednesday that a strict voter identification law in Texas discriminated against black and Hispanic voters and violated the Voting Rights Act of 1965 a decision that election experts called an important step toward defining the future reach of the landmark law.
The state of federal voting protections has been uncertain since 2013, when the Supreme Court blocked the acts most potent enforcement tool, a requirement that numerous states, including Texas, with histories of discrimination receive federal clearance before changing election rules. The Texas ID case along with another in Texas challenging its redistricting plans and a case in North Carolina over broader changes in election rules has been closely watched in legal circles to see how courts will interpret the remaining provisions of the landmark federal law.
Wednesdays decision, hailed by civil rights groups, affirmed an important part of a lower-court ruling. But the appeals panel also said the lower court must re-examine its conclusion last year that Texas adopted the law with a discriminatory purpose. That conclusion could have led to a restoration of federal oversight over Texas voting laws.
Texas is expected to appeal the ruling that its law must be altered, either to the full Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans or to the United States Supreme Court.
Read more: http://nytimes.com/2015/08/06/us/appellate-panel-says-texas-id-law-broke-us-voting-rights-act.html
AllFieldsRequired
(489 posts)The right has so fucked up this country that they have changed the conversation to what TYPE of ID you can require.
yeoman6987
(14,449 posts)I would just throw a picture on all voter cards myself. That seems the most logical solution to me.
Skittles
(153,193 posts)big sign on the wall said VOTER ID NOT REQUIRED when I voted
these efforts are nothing but racist bullshit republican rules in their effort to suppress voting....I'm glad to see not all Texas officials are on board
UTUSN
(70,740 posts)kenfrequed
(7,865 posts)I hope we get more rulings like this!
hifiguy
(33,688 posts)Hope it holds up in an en banc hearing before the entire Fifth Circuit, but that's a tossup.
Hawaii Hiker
(3,166 posts)which has to be the most conservative Appellate Court in the country....
Obama has been able to shift power of courts from Republican to Democrat in several circuits, DC Circuit, Fourth Circuit with some great judicial nominations, but the 5th Circuit is still very, very conservative..
Judi Lynn
(160,616 posts)madville
(7,412 posts)States keep getting their laws overturned? Of course in Florida it can be a utility bill or several other things, it's not very strict but some kind of "proof" is required.
lark
(23,155 posts)You have to have a state ID or a driver's license and it has to be in your current name and have current address. For women who get married and college students who move, this is a harsh requirement. Also a lot of older blacks didn't get birth certificates so can't get drivers licenses or State ID's. Also, a lot of states have closed the offices where people can get ID's in areas where there are lots of college kids and minorities and have limited the hours when these places are open.
College ID's are of course, not accepted in some of these places. I believe WI is one of them, but think there may be others as well?
ananda
(28,876 posts)Proof of residence -- such as a utility bill -- would still be required.