Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
Wed Aug 5, 2015, 06:02 PM Aug 2015

Appellate Panel Says Texas ID Law Broke U.S. Voting Rights Act

Source: New York Times

A federal appeals panel ruled Wednesday that a strict voter identification law in Texas discriminated against black and Hispanic voters and violated the Voting Rights Act of 1965 — a decision that election experts called an important step toward defining the future reach of the landmark law.

The state of federal voting protections has been uncertain since 2013, when the Supreme Court blocked the act’s most potent enforcement tool, a requirement that numerous states, including Texas, with histories of discrimination receive federal clearance before changing election rules. The Texas ID case — along with another in Texas challenging its redistricting plans and a case in North Carolina over broader changes in election rules — has been closely watched in legal circles to see how courts will interpret the remaining provisions of the landmark federal law.

Wednesday’s decision, hailed by civil rights groups, affirmed an important part of a lower-court ruling. But the appeals panel also said the lower court must re-examine its conclusion last year that Texas adopted the law with a discriminatory purpose. That conclusion could have led to a restoration of federal oversight over Texas voting laws.

Texas is expected to appeal the ruling that its law must be altered, either to the full Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans or to the United States Supreme Court.

Read more: http://nytimes.com/2015/08/06/us/appellate-panel-says-texas-id-law-broke-us-voting-rights-act.html

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Appellate Panel Says Texas ID Law Broke U.S. Voting Rights Act (Original Post) onehandle Aug 2015 OP
No ID can be required, period. AllFieldsRequired Aug 2015 #1
They certainly have yeoman6987 Aug 2015 #2
where I live, they were perfectly happy with the old rules Skittles Aug 2015 #8
rk!!!!!!! UTUSN Aug 2015 #3
More of these laws need to be challenged! kenfrequed Aug 2015 #4
Excellent. hifiguy Aug 2015 #5
Wow, and from the FIFTH Circuit to Hawaii Hiker Aug 2015 #6
YES! catrose Aug 2015 #7
Good news. n/t Judi Lynn Aug 2015 #9
How can Florida require ID but all these other madville Aug 2015 #10
Other states have way stiffer requirements than FL. lark Aug 2015 #11
This means we revert to the law as of 2011, I believe. ananda Aug 2015 #12

AllFieldsRequired

(489 posts)
1. No ID can be required, period.
Wed Aug 5, 2015, 06:04 PM
Aug 2015

The right has so fucked up this country that they have changed the conversation to what TYPE of ID you can require.

 

yeoman6987

(14,449 posts)
2. They certainly have
Wed Aug 5, 2015, 06:21 PM
Aug 2015

I would just throw a picture on all voter cards myself. That seems the most logical solution to me.

Skittles

(153,193 posts)
8. where I live, they were perfectly happy with the old rules
Wed Aug 5, 2015, 08:57 PM
Aug 2015

big sign on the wall said VOTER ID NOT REQUIRED when I voted

these efforts are nothing but racist bullshit republican rules in their effort to suppress voting....I'm glad to see not all Texas officials are on board

 

hifiguy

(33,688 posts)
5. Excellent.
Wed Aug 5, 2015, 08:08 PM
Aug 2015

Hope it holds up in an en banc hearing before the entire Fifth Circuit, but that's a tossup.

Hawaii Hiker

(3,166 posts)
6. Wow, and from the FIFTH Circuit to
Wed Aug 5, 2015, 08:25 PM
Aug 2015

which has to be the most conservative Appellate Court in the country....

Obama has been able to shift power of courts from Republican to Democrat in several circuits, DC Circuit, Fourth Circuit with some great judicial nominations, but the 5th Circuit is still very, very conservative..

madville

(7,412 posts)
10. How can Florida require ID but all these other
Wed Aug 5, 2015, 09:31 PM
Aug 2015

States keep getting their laws overturned? Of course in Florida it can be a utility bill or several other things, it's not very strict but some kind of "proof" is required.

lark

(23,155 posts)
11. Other states have way stiffer requirements than FL.
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 01:25 PM
Aug 2015

You have to have a state ID or a driver's license and it has to be in your current name and have current address. For women who get married and college students who move, this is a harsh requirement. Also a lot of older blacks didn't get birth certificates so can't get drivers licenses or State ID's. Also, a lot of states have closed the offices where people can get ID's in areas where there are lots of college kids and minorities and have limited the hours when these places are open.

College ID's are of course, not accepted in some of these places. I believe WI is one of them, but think there may be others as well?

ananda

(28,876 posts)
12. This means we revert to the law as of 2011, I believe.
Thu Aug 6, 2015, 06:06 PM
Aug 2015

Proof of residence -- such as a utility bill -- would still be required.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Appellate Panel Says Texa...