Ex-Kremlin Internet 'Troll' Wins Suit Against Ex-Employer
Source: New York Times
ST. PETERSBURG, Russia A Russian court on Monday awarded symbolic damages of one ruble ($0.01) to a former "Kremlin troll" who sued her ex-employer and demanded closure of what she describes as a "factory" that has been churning out Internet propaganda defending President Vladimir Putin.
In an interview in April, Lyudmila Savchuk told The Associated Press how she and hundreds of colleagues in St. Petersburg managed several social media accounts, flooding the Internet with pro-Putin commentary and doctored images that landed on Russian and Western news websites.
Savchuk's descriptions of the work coincide with those of other former trolls who have spoken publicly, although she was one of the few willing to disclose her identity. She quit after two months, deciding she couldn't stand being part of a propaganda machine. She said most of the workers were young and attracted by relatively high monthly salaries of 40,000 to 50,000 rubles ($600 to $770).
The Petrogradsky district court on Tuesday set the damages at just one ruble as the plaintiff requested, but didn't close the facility. Savchuk said she was happy with the ruling because she thought her mission had been accomplished.
<more>
Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/aponline/2015/08/17/world/europe/ap-eu-russia-troll-lawsuit.html
Sunlei
(22,651 posts)forest444
(5,902 posts)Well, hell. The country would be as broke as Trump claims it is.
(the whole bunch that's hijacked Wikipedia alone would cost a pretty penny)
tabasco
(22,974 posts)Paying people to troll the Internet for him.
[font size=8]LOLOL!![/font]
MADem
(135,425 posts)Some of 'em were so 'obvious' it was, well....obvious!
FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)where the government does no such thing.
tabasco
(22,974 posts)..l..
TygrBright
(20,762 posts)Hydra
(14,459 posts)newthinking
(3,982 posts)We have a much more effective method of covering our tracks.
NuclearDem
(16,184 posts)Gold star!
FlatBaroque
(3,160 posts)Cha-ching!
LanternWaste
(37,748 posts)At least in America, you have the right to make an statement completely irrelevant to the OP though. No doubt, it counts for something else you wouldn't have used it as such...
(space for additional irrelevance provided below at no charge)