Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,742 posts)
Wed Aug 19, 2015, 02:02 PM Aug 2015

Rand Paul Purchases a Path Around an Inconvenient Kentucky Law

Source: The Atlantic

Rand Paul is giving new meaning to the term “buying an election.”

Over the weekend, the Kentucky senator said he gave $250,000 to his state’s Republican Party for the explicit purpose of funding its presidential caucus in March. He promised to pony up another $200,000 in the fall, enough to cover the entire cost of the nominating event. Put another way: Paul is paying the party to hold an election in which he is running.

He’s doing it neither to ensure a victory nor out of the simple goodness of his heart. No, Paul is making a rather blatant end-run around state law, and he’s compensating the Kentucky GOP for going along with him. The law forbids someone from appearing on the same ballot as a candidate for two different offices, and Paul, who is up for reelection next year, doesn’t want to give up his Senate seat to make his rather long-shot bid for the presidency.

Democrats in the Bluegrass Grass state blocked his allies’ attempt to repeal the law, so Paul has been trying to persuade the Republican Party to ditch its presidential primary in May in favor of a caucus in March. That way, the primaries for president and Senate won’t be on the same day, and Paul won’t have to appear twice on the same ballot. (The change wouldn’t fix the problem in the general election, but for a candidate sitting around eighth in the polls, that’s a bridge to cross another day.) Paul’s idea won a crucial endorsement from Mitch McConnell, the Senate majority leader and preeminent power broker in Kentucky, and while members of the state party have generally been receptive, some have voiced concerns about paying for a separate election in a year when Republicans are desperately trying to wrest the governor’s mansion away from Democrats. That election is this November, and it’s expected to be close.


Read more: http://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2015/08/rand-paul-will-pay-for-kentuckys-gop-election-by-himself/401711/



Personally, I don't think he has to worry. By the time the Primary rolls around, he'll be long gone from the Presidential race.
9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
 

hrmjustin

(71,265 posts)
2. I think the courts may shut this down. Even if the gop goes to a caucus the state
Wed Aug 19, 2015, 02:11 PM
Aug 2015

still will hold a primary by law so his name would still be on the ballot twice if he continues his run for president.

brooklynite

(94,742 posts)
5. No - not if he doesn't file for ballot access
Wed Aug 19, 2015, 02:35 PM
Aug 2015

...which would look silly, but it would be a legal workaround.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Rand Paul Purchases a Pat...