Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

TexasTowelie

(112,384 posts)
Thu Aug 20, 2015, 03:33 PM Aug 2015

Authorities to recommend manslaughter charge for Caitlyn Jenner in fatal crash

Source: AP

LOS ANGELES — Sheriff’s investigators plan to recommend prosecutors file a vehicular manslaughter charge against Caitlyn Jenner for her role in a fatal car crash on the Pacific Coast Highway in Malibu last February, officials said Thursday.

Investigators found that Jenner was driving “unsafe for the prevailing road conditions” because her SUV rear-ended a Lexus, pushing it into oncoming traffic, Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department spokeswoman Nicole Nishida said.

Jenner was hauling an off-road vehicle on a trailer behind her Cadillac Escalade on Feb. 7 when she steered to avoid cars slowing for a traffic light in front of her on Pacific Coast Highway.

Jenner’s SUV rear-ended two cars, pushing a Lexus into oncoming traffic.

Read more: http://www.dallasnews.com/news/local-news/20150820-authorities-to-recommend-manslaughter-charge-for-caitlyn-jenner-in-fatal-crash.ece

41 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Authorities to recommend manslaughter charge for Caitlyn Jenner in fatal crash (Original Post) TexasTowelie Aug 2015 OP
From an editing standpoint, bigworld Aug 2015 #1
No. At least I don't think so, but what the F do I know? Elmer S. E. Dump Aug 2015 #5
A better question: Reter Aug 2015 #21
That would have been interesting. Elmer S. E. Dump Aug 2015 #22
im guessing a male jail with solitary confinement and administrative segregation big_dog Aug 2015 #34
If they put her in jail they should put the paparazzi in there with her. pnwmom Aug 2015 #39
Elements of Style indicates that the pronoun used in the here and now LanternWaste Aug 2015 #12
Thank you! <nt> bigworld Aug 2015 #13
GOOD!!!!! It's made me sick to see her basking in celebrity after this HFRN Aug 2015 #2
She rear-ended someone. She wasn't drinking or on drugs. She wasn't speeding pnwmom Aug 2015 #25
She was tailgating. REP Aug 2015 #29
Well, she did rear-end someone. That's all we really know right? pnwmom Aug 2015 #31
I don't understand that. Syzygy321 Aug 2015 #33
This is what civil lawsuits are for. The victim wasn't close to anyone, apparently, pnwmom Aug 2015 #35
Wow shenmue Aug 2015 #3
"she'll have to answer to the law like everyone else" Kelvin Mace Aug 2015 #14
Well, being charged with manslaughter is the same thing you or I would face. shenmue Aug 2015 #15
Yes, she cleared that hurdle Kelvin Mace Aug 2015 #16
They haven't decided yet whether to charge her or not. n.t pnwmom Aug 2015 #32
Not necessarily. They still have to decide whether to charge her. pnwmom Aug 2015 #26
You keep repeating and bolding that statement like you really Syzygy321 Aug 2015 #36
How many of us have to contend with paparazzi hounding us when we're driving? pnwmom Aug 2015 #38
Nope. That's up there with me blaming Syzygy321 Aug 2015 #40
It takes very little distraction, as you know, to cause an accident. pnwmom Aug 2015 #41
Misdemeanor - so I've read on other sites n/t OKNancy Aug 2015 #4
Vehicular manslaughter is a misdemeanor? Elmer S. E. Dump Aug 2015 #6
In CA when you kill someone with your car former9thward Aug 2015 #8
Thank you! Elmer S. E. Dump Aug 2015 #10
It can be charged as either jberryhill Aug 2015 #9
Thank you! Elmer S. E. Dump Aug 2015 #11
If you rear-ended someone, causing a death, you could be charged with this, too. pnwmom Aug 2015 #24
Women drivers! Elmer S. E. Dump Aug 2015 #7
Good.Killers need to go to jail when they murder innocent people. n/t jtuck004 Aug 2015 #17
It's an accident man taught_me_patience Aug 2015 #18
What, Just hose off the street, call it good? You call that compassion, I call it heartless. jtuck004 Aug 2015 #19
Did you get this upset when Milton Olin was killed? ga_girl Aug 2015 #20
I was driving side by side to a woman for a good 30 seconds Elmer S. E. Dump Aug 2015 #23
The police have already concluded that no one involved was using a cell phone. n/t pnwmom Aug 2015 #28
The state is alleging no murder. She's not being accused of speeding, pnwmom Aug 2015 #27
Good. REP Aug 2015 #30
She hasn't yet been charged. And have you forgotten that she was being pnwmom Aug 2015 #37

bigworld

(1,807 posts)
1. From an editing standpoint,
Thu Aug 20, 2015, 03:38 PM
Aug 2015

Shouldn't they write "Bruce" and "he" when referring to the time period of the accident?

Guess there's no AP Stylebook entry for this sort of thing yet.

 

Elmer S. E. Dump

(5,751 posts)
5. No. At least I don't think so, but what the F do I know?
Thu Aug 20, 2015, 04:04 PM
Aug 2015

Anyway he was already a she when it happened. She just wasn't public about it yet.

 

big_dog

(4,144 posts)
34. im guessing a male jail with solitary confinement and administrative segregation
Fri Aug 21, 2015, 12:16 AM
Aug 2015

no way Jenner is in the general population, they might have to do a pete rose and put Caitlyn in a 'super max' style buliding beacuase of the press

pnwmom

(108,990 posts)
39. If they put her in jail they should put the paparazzi in there with her.
Fri Aug 21, 2015, 12:27 AM
Aug 2015

The ones that probably distracted her and managed to get photos seconds after the accident.

 

LanternWaste

(37,748 posts)
12. Elements of Style indicates that the pronoun used in the here and now
Thu Aug 20, 2015, 04:44 PM
Aug 2015

Elements of Style indicates that (all things being equal) the pronoun used in the here and now is the appropriate pronoun for past and future tense usage also.

 

HFRN

(1,469 posts)
2. GOOD!!!!! It's made me sick to see her basking in celebrity after this
Thu Aug 20, 2015, 03:41 PM
Aug 2015

We have a more local story, an Iraq war vet, evidence of PTSD, was nonetheless allegedly driving drunk and killed someone. Sad story all around. It's made me sick to see Jenner basking in celebrity while this war vet is having his life torn apart in the process of just accountability. His life has been nothing but that accident, while her life seems to be everything but that accident

pnwmom

(108,990 posts)
25. She rear-ended someone. She wasn't drinking or on drugs. She wasn't speeding
Thu Aug 20, 2015, 11:29 PM
Aug 2015

or using a cell phone.

So why on earth should you celebrate this?

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-manslaughter-charge-caitlyn-jenner-20150820-story.html

Legal experts describe the charge Jenner could face as low-level. “Basically, anyone can get into this situation behind the wheel like Ms. Jenner. There is no drugs or alcohol involved. This is just unsafe driving,” said attorney Dmitry Gorin, a former Los Angeles County prosecutor. “I remember a law professor getting charged.... If you commit a road infraction that results in a death, that becomes a traffic misdemeanor manslaughter.”


pnwmom

(108,990 posts)
31. Well, she did rear-end someone. That's all we really know right?
Fri Aug 21, 2015, 12:03 AM
Aug 2015

I've been rear-ended twice, with fortunately no injuries. The drivers behind me were momentarily distracted. I think it could happen to virtually anybody.

 

Syzygy321

(583 posts)
33. I don't understand that.
Fri Aug 21, 2015, 12:15 AM
Aug 2015

I don't know what "traffic misdemeanor manslaughter" means.

I know that if I ever drive unsafely and kill someone, it will devastate me and prey on my mind and make me want to prostrate myself before the victim's family and consider killing myself. (I was in a similar situation once.).

Maybe Jenner feels like that. But it's hard to tell from the VF cover shot. And it's pretty jarring to think of the dead person's family crying and having to see Jenner beaming on magazine covers and interviews and getting celebrated and called a hero.

Justice for the dead, please.

pnwmom

(108,990 posts)
35. This is what civil lawsuits are for. The victim wasn't close to anyone, apparently,
Fri Aug 21, 2015, 12:17 AM
Aug 2015

but there are step-children who are suing Jenner now. The same step-children who supposedly were left out of her will.

http://www.tmz.com/2015/04/02/bruce-jenner-wrongful-death-lawsuit-crash-car-accident-victim-stepchildren/

Kim does have 2 grown stepkids, neither of whom live in California. We spoke with people who were extremely close to Kim who tell us she had "virtually no relationship" with either stepchild.

Nonetheless, were told both stepchildren have lawyered up, because they're the only remaining people who have a legal right to file a wrongful death lawsuit. In California, stepchildren have legal standing to sue, even if they were estranged from the stepparent.

Sources tell us, the lawyer for one of the stepchildren has already asked his client to find as many pictures and other evidence showing some relationship between himself and Kim ... presumably to help establish damages in the lawsuit.
One thing we know ... the stepchildren will not inherit Kim's property. We're told she has a trust with millions in assets that are earmarked for charity. And there's a will with a modest amount -- $55k -- that also benefits various animal charities, including, PETA, Lange Foundation, PAWS (Performing Animal Welfare Society), Doris Day Animal League and The Elephant Sanctuary of Tennessee.


shenmue

(38,506 posts)
3. Wow
Thu Aug 20, 2015, 03:46 PM
Aug 2015


I like Caitlin, but the accident was terrible, and she'll have to answer to the law like everyone else.
 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
14. "she'll have to answer to the law like everyone else"
Thu Aug 20, 2015, 05:25 PM
Aug 2015

Well, not really. She's very rich, and rich people's justice is quite different from what you or I would face.

pnwmom

(108,990 posts)
26. Not necessarily. They still have to decide whether to charge her.
Thu Aug 20, 2015, 11:31 PM
Aug 2015

And since there is no allegation she was speeding, using a cell phone, or on drugs or alcohol, they might decide not to. And I wouldn't blame them. Cars are dangerous and people make mistakes.

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-manslaughter-charge-caitlyn-jenner-20150820-story.html

Legal experts describe the charge Jenner could face as low-level. “Basically, anyone can get into this situation behind the wheel like Ms. Jenner. There is no drugs or alcohol involved. This is just unsafe driving,” said attorney Dmitry Gorin, a former Los Angeles County prosecutor. “I remember a law professor getting charged.... If you commit a road infraction that results in a death, that becomes a traffic misdemeanor manslaughter.”


 

Syzygy321

(583 posts)
36. You keep repeating and bolding that statement like you really
Fri Aug 21, 2015, 12:22 AM
Aug 2015

really want to minimize Jenner's responsibility.

Yes, it could happen to anyone.
Yes, it was unsafe driving.
Yes, if your unsafe driving kills someone, you are guilty of a crime.

I am not saying that this could never happen to you or me. I am saying that if it happened to you or me we would deserve to be convicted and punished according to the law. And Jenner does too.

pnwmom

(108,990 posts)
38. How many of us have to contend with paparazzi hounding us when we're driving?
Fri Aug 21, 2015, 12:25 AM
Aug 2015

So she was distracted. They should be held at least partially to blame.

 

Syzygy321

(583 posts)
40. Nope. That's up there with me blaming
Fri Aug 21, 2015, 12:32 AM
Aug 2015

my kids fighting in the back seat, or an emergency call from work. The kids and the nurses don't get the blame.

(Yes, many of us do have distractions while we drive.)

pnwmom

(108,990 posts)
41. It takes very little distraction, as you know, to cause an accident.
Fri Aug 21, 2015, 12:48 AM
Aug 2015

Children can be such a distraction, but they're kids. The paparazzi are adults who have decided to stalk people with cars. And they aren't doing it because there's an emergency.

former9thward

(32,068 posts)
8. In CA when you kill someone with your car
Thu Aug 20, 2015, 04:20 PM
Aug 2015

the prosecutors look at whether you committed ordinary negligence or gross negligence. If ordinary negligence then it is charged as a misdemeanor. If gross negligence then it may be charged as a felony or a misdemeanor. Here the prosecutors are saying Jenner committed ordinary negligence.

 

jberryhill

(62,444 posts)
9. It can be charged as either
Thu Aug 20, 2015, 04:21 PM
Aug 2015

https://www.wklaw.com/vehicular-manslaughter-overview/

1.1. Gross vehicular manslaughter Penal Code 192(c)(1)
1.2. Misdemeanor vehicular manslaughter Penal Code 192(c)(2)

The distinction seems to depend on whether there was a traffic violation or gross negligence on the one hand, or no traffic violation and ordinary negligence on the other, but I haven't looked at it in detail.

pnwmom

(108,990 posts)
24. If you rear-ended someone, causing a death, you could be charged with this, too.
Thu Aug 20, 2015, 11:23 PM
Aug 2015

Even if, like Jenner, there was no alcohol or drugs, or speeding, or cell phone involved.

The only thing she did wrong was drive too fast "for the conditions" -- meaning, she made a driving mistake but it wasn't intentional.

http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-manslaughter-charge-caitlyn-jenner-20150820-story.html

Legal experts describe the charge Jenner could face as low-level. “Basically, anyone can get into this situation behind the wheel like Ms. Jenner. There is no drugs or alcohol involved. This is just unsafe driving,” said attorney Dmitry Gorin, a former Los Angeles County prosecutor. “I remember a law professor getting charged.... If you commit a road infraction that results in a death, that becomes a traffic misdemeanor manslaughter.”

 

taught_me_patience

(5,477 posts)
18. It's an accident man
Thu Aug 20, 2015, 08:09 PM
Aug 2015

that doesn't make someone a murderer. She should not be going to jail over this. Have a little compassion.

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
19. What, Just hose off the street, call it good? You call that compassion, I call it heartless.
Thu Aug 20, 2015, 08:55 PM
Aug 2015

Does the other person's life really just mean nothing to you? Not even interested in talking to someone who cares that little.

One is required by law to pay full time and attention to your driving. Else people die for your laziness and ignorance. Wasn't an accident. No one made her drive too close or too fast. Her wheels didn't fall off. She should have and was obligated to stay a safe distance back.

Didn't and killed an innocent person, intentionally driving in an unsafe manner. That's manslaughter.

Is she so inept she can't be held to the same standards we hold l any 16 year old kid to? Seriously? Go waste someone else's time with that one.

Selfish ass clowns are whom we make jail cells for - because there will be another unless something is done. Maybe this will open her eyes to the fact that there are other people in the world. Doubt it.

bye.

ga_girl

(183 posts)
20. Did you get this upset when Milton Olin was killed?
Thu Aug 20, 2015, 10:08 PM
Aug 2015

Bicycling along a wide street, in the bike lane, middle of the day, run over and killed. Offending driver wasn't even issued a traffic ticket.

Of course, that driver was a Los Angeles County deputy, and he was exonerated because there's an exception to the distracted driving laws in California for emergency responders.

Same standard it seems to me.

 

Elmer S. E. Dump

(5,751 posts)
23. I was driving side by side to a woman for a good 30 seconds
Thu Aug 20, 2015, 11:01 PM
Aug 2015

She was looking down, feverishly texting with both hands, looking up every 4-5 seconds, then back to her important texting. She was apparently steering with her knees, and she was totally oblivious to me glaring at her with great contempt.

In situations like that, there is NEVER a cop around. Seems they only show up when you don't want them to.

pnwmom

(108,990 posts)
27. The state is alleging no murder. She's not being accused of speeding,
Thu Aug 20, 2015, 11:33 PM
Aug 2015

or of using drugs/alcohol, or of texting while driving. The charge is virtually automatic when a person is driving and causes a death, even if no reckless behavior is involved.

This could happen to anybody who is involved in an rear-end collision that results in a death.


http://www.latimes.com/local/lanow/la-me-ln-manslaughter-charge-caitlyn-jenner-20150820-story.html

Legal experts describe the charge Jenner could face as low-level. “Basically, anyone can get into this situation behind the wheel like Ms. Jenner. There is no drugs or alcohol involved. This is just unsafe driving,” said attorney Dmitry Gorin, a former Los Angeles County prosecutor. “I remember a law professor getting charged.... If you commit a road infraction that results in a death, that becomes a traffic misdemeanor manslaughter.”

REP

(21,691 posts)
30. Good.
Thu Aug 20, 2015, 11:51 PM
Aug 2015

It would have been better if she hadn't been tailgating and was able to stop her car in a safe manner without rear ending hard enough to cause a death, but at least she's been charged.

pnwmom

(108,990 posts)
37. She hasn't yet been charged. And have you forgotten that she was being
Fri Aug 21, 2015, 12:23 AM
Aug 2015

followed by paparazzi?

That could have caused her significant distraction.

They have already established that she wasn't on drugs/alcohol, using a phone, or speeding.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Authorities to recommend ...