Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

sketchy

(458 posts)
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 03:09 PM Aug 2015

Kobach and Sedgwick County Seek to Block Release of Voting Machine Records

Source: wibwnewsnow.com

Kansas Secretary of State Kris Kobach and Sedgwick County election officials have asked a court to block the release of voting machine logs.

Kobach contends records sought by Wichita State University mathematician Beth Clarkson aren’t subject to the Kansas open records act, and their disclosure’s prohibited under state law.

Clarkson says what she’s seen so far reflects a troubling trend.

Clarkson said “This is not a random distribution. We are seeing a very definite trend here that the larger the precinct is, the higher the percentage of the Republican vote is.”


Read more: http://www.wibwnewsnow.com/kobach-and-sedgwick-county-seek-to-block-release-of-voting-machine-records/

93 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Kobach and Sedgwick County Seek to Block Release of Voting Machine Records (Original Post) sketchy Aug 2015 OP
Now, why would you do that unless you had something to hide. CanonRay Aug 2015 #1
No Authentic Elections In US Since 1996 billhicks76 Aug 2015 #24
+1000000000000000000000 2naSalit Aug 2015 #29
BIG, BIG Problem! tech3149 Aug 2015 #33
I Bet Some Big Name Democrats Threatened To Expose billhicks76 Aug 2015 #53
I firmly believe they did work out some deal. I think Howard Dean and Ted Lamont both appeared GoneFishin Aug 2015 #63
The Silence Is Weird billhicks76 Aug 2015 #68
False identities and subterfuge actually are a thing. They do exist. Enthusiast Aug 2015 #71
No stretch at all. Spying and sabotage have been around forever. And right wingers are not limited GoneFishin Aug 2015 #77
One year I worked with another election judge who admitted she was really a repub, not a dem. CrispyQ Aug 2015 #78
+ a gazillion!!! valerief Aug 2015 #58
Ding! Winnah! Raster Aug 2015 #69
Imagine the media outrage if this was a Democratic SoS?! Roland99 Aug 2015 #2
The 'report' would be in heavy rotation on every 'news' channel…..if it was a Dem SoS. blm Aug 2015 #5
That is behavior typical of sociopaths. Lying and cheating are as natural to them as breathing. Cal33 Aug 2015 #44
Weasels. nt bemildred Aug 2015 #3
Unless you’re hiding something, what possible reason could you give for blocking the release? dorkzilla Aug 2015 #4
Costs money to do that. He's exhibiting fiscal conservatism! Roland99 Aug 2015 #8
They are hiding something.... usaf-vet Aug 2015 #6
Next stop-they've been accidentally deleted. jalan48 Aug 2015 #7
Or partial release: where "sensitive information" has been filtered out. n/t Betty Karlson Aug 2015 #60
You could be right. It looks more cooperative to give them bad data than none at all. GoneFishin Aug 2015 #64
"supplying the voting logs is “unnecessarily burdensome” because they’re hard to copy." think Aug 2015 #9
"Logs are heavy." GoneFishin Aug 2015 #65
Okay, that made me lol. CrispyQ Aug 2015 #79
DUZY! (nt) apnu Aug 2015 #82
"My dog ate them." GoneFishin Aug 2015 #66
It would behoove Kobach and the Kansas GOP to release the voting machine logs. KansDem Aug 2015 #10
hey it takes a lot of time and effort to fake those logs! 0rganism Aug 2015 #28
Dear Kansas children and parents. If you are sitting in a math class, either there is something to jtuck004 Aug 2015 #11
someone may be registering people who never vote and mailing in groups of votes. Sunlei Aug 2015 #12
Seems legit. AzDar Aug 2015 #13
The Koch Brothers ANOIS Aug 2015 #14
I'm located about 2 minutes away from Koch Central, the US headquarters Stevepol Aug 2015 #20
From what I have heard and read even the republicans in Kansas don't like Brownback Botany Aug 2015 #39
Precisely. Enthusiast Aug 2015 #80
Our instant gratification society doesn't help. And the media? CrispyQ Aug 2015 #81
Problem with increased Republican votes in larger precincts Hannahcares Aug 2015 #15
"This is a huge potential problem for the 2016 elections." <--THIS nt 99th_Monkey Aug 2015 #35
I believe some of Clarkson's work also showed an unusual vote pattern for Wisconsin too Botany Aug 2015 #16
I think the Kochs have an office there also. glinda Aug 2015 #50
Yeah they do. We call it "The Capitol." Scuba Aug 2015 #67
Don't forget Waukesha County Bettie Aug 2015 #73
Poisoned water and now they want the Lake's water..... glinda Aug 2015 #90
I'd say the Kochs et al... Jerry442 Aug 2015 #17
Looks like Kansas needs to do what Wisconsin has already done. staggerleem Aug 2015 #18
Saw that in the Wichita Eagle this morning- KrazyinKS Aug 2015 #19
Glad to see someone is digging. Ms. Clarkson has maybe noticed something a little iffy? Tatiana Aug 2015 #21
Shades of Ohio in 2004 chapdrum Aug 2015 #22
+1! snot Aug 2015 #42
Prediction . . . markpkessinger Aug 2015 #23
Unfortunately, I expect you're right tech3149 Aug 2015 #34
The Kansas SC still has some decent judges left over from Democratic administrations. That tblue37 Aug 2015 #40
I would really much prefer to be wrong . . . markpkessinger Aug 2015 #55
Sound prediction. Enthusiast Aug 2015 #72
Really.... blackspade Aug 2015 #25
Seems awfully strange not only is this kacekwl Aug 2015 #26
Wasserman's already working overtime 99th_Monkey Aug 2015 #37
Her top priority is to keep progressives out. Republicans come in third. nm rhett o rick Aug 2015 #45
the woman is usless dorkzilla Aug 2015 #54
OK you posters down Wichita way MuseRider Aug 2015 #27
Hmmm...... maybe...... Turbineguy Aug 2015 #30
Kobach is only interested in voter fraud, not election fraud. Two completely different things. LonePirate Aug 2015 #31
This is the tiny tip a very ugly iceberg 99th_Monkey Aug 2015 #32
To protect corporatist Democratic incumbents from awkward primary challenges from the left. tblue37 Aug 2015 #38
... in Kansas. apnu Aug 2015 #83
No--this nonsense goes on all over the country. The woman who spotted the hinky discrepancy tblue37 Aug 2015 #91
K&R for visibility. nt tblue37 Aug 2015 #36
What are Rebl Aug 2015 #41
K&R'D!!! snot Aug 2015 #43
This is a great article but may meet the definition of a Conspiracy Theory. rhett o rick Aug 2015 #46
I wish they'd check Texas Voting Machine records. Unknown Beatle Aug 2015 #47
FL as well. /sigh. nashville_brook Aug 2015 #88
Thanks to everyone for your posts sketchy Aug 2015 #48
kick n/t sketchy Aug 2015 #49
PLEASE let this get the attention it deserves. nt SusanCalvin Aug 2015 #51
I wish the professor all of the luck in the world but the lawsuit has little chance Gothmog Aug 2015 #52
K&R (N/T) Old Crow Aug 2015 #56
Kicking! n/t veness Aug 2015 #57
I think polls are also being manipulated Lodestar Aug 2015 #59
Of course they are. SusanCalvin Aug 2015 #93
Going to take some people who never registered to vote, to check and find out..'someone' registered Sunlei Aug 2015 #61
what percent of the USA population never votes? 30%? or is it even higher? Sunlei Aug 2015 #62
This story is HUGE, and needs to go NATIONAL ASAP! TrollBuster9090 Aug 2015 #70
Rat bastard. lonestarnot Aug 2015 #75
Thanks for posting this. This shit is important. beerandjesus Aug 2015 #74
K & R, sketchy! But of course, the larger the precinct the higher the republican steal...it's the mother earth Aug 2015 #76
That's right They_Live Aug 2015 #87
Where theres smoke... workinclasszero Aug 2015 #84
Now why would someone object the the release of this boring, boring data? Vinca Aug 2015 #85
Crooking it big time! d_legendary1 Aug 2015 #86
holycrap. just not going to give up the voting records...the most fundamental proof of democracy nashville_brook Aug 2015 #89
What counts the votes? RobertEarl Aug 2015 #92
 

billhicks76

(5,082 posts)
24. No Authentic Elections In US Since 1996
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 04:47 PM
Aug 2015

This has to be stopped. I wonder if any Democrats went along with this too.

tech3149

(4,452 posts)
33. BIG, BIG Problem!
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 05:34 PM
Aug 2015

Absolutely no one from the political class wants to admit that election theft is even a possibility. The typical song and dance is that admitting it is possible will demoralize the electorate. Seriously? Can we do any worse? Half the eligible voting public doesn't even bother. At least half of those that do vote based on misinformation, disinformation, or no information.
Thanks to newer channels of communication it's possible to get a bit of truth through the media filters. That's why they have to resort to manipulating elections more directly. Any serious investigation should be able to blow the whole thing up and might even get Joe And Jane Smith to pay attention and be informed.

 

billhicks76

(5,082 posts)
53. I Bet Some Big Name Democrats Threatened To Expose
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 10:36 PM
Aug 2015

And were given a piece of the pie to shut up. The facts were just to readily apparent and accessible.

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
63. I firmly believe they did work out some deal. I think Howard Dean and Ted Lamont both appeared
Wed Aug 26, 2015, 06:08 AM
Aug 2015

to have been screwed by other "Democrats".

And the Democratic Party's silence on this issue is very telling.

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
71. False identities and subterfuge actually are a thing. They do exist.
Wed Aug 26, 2015, 09:19 AM
Aug 2015

Imagine, for example, a Republican that is ideologically far right in their political persuasion. They pose as a Democrat because as a Democrat they can create all sorts of havoc for the party. Not too much of a stretch is it?

GoneFishin

(5,217 posts)
77. No stretch at all. Spying and sabotage have been around forever. And right wingers are not limited
Wed Aug 26, 2015, 10:46 AM
Aug 2015

by moral or ethical constraints.

So you can pretty much assume that it is happening somewhere.

CrispyQ

(36,509 posts)
78. One year I worked with another election judge who admitted she was really a repub, not a dem.
Wed Aug 26, 2015, 10:52 AM
Aug 2015

I told her, "I could never do that. Tell people I'm a republican? No fucking way." You should have seen her expression.

blm

(113,091 posts)
5. The 'report' would be in heavy rotation on every 'news' channel…..if it was a Dem SoS.
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 03:14 PM
Aug 2015

It's ALWAYS OK If It's a Republican.

 

Cal33

(7,018 posts)
44. That is behavior typical of sociopaths. Lying and cheating are as natural to them as breathing.
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 08:10 PM
Aug 2015

dorkzilla

(5,141 posts)
4. Unless you’re hiding something, what possible reason could you give for blocking the release?
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 03:13 PM
Aug 2015

The question is obviously rhetorical - they have something to hide. I’d love to see the provision in the law they’re referring to that allegedly prohibits this. Surely any reasonable person would want an investigation if there was any hint of impropriety.

 

think

(11,641 posts)
9. "supplying the voting logs is “unnecessarily burdensome” because they’re hard to copy."
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 03:18 PM
Aug 2015

Got any other excuses?

KansDem

(28,498 posts)
10. It would behoove Kobach and the Kansas GOP to release the voting machine logs.
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 03:22 PM
Aug 2015

Just to put everyone's minds at ease. Even if they're not subject to the Kansas open records act.

I imagine the "open records act" was written long before the introduction of super-secret corporate proprietary voting software.

0rganism

(23,970 posts)
28. hey it takes a lot of time and effort to fake those logs!
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 05:12 PM
Aug 2015

an appeals process barely gives them the time they need to get everything looking nice and shiny.

 

jtuck004

(15,882 posts)
11. Dear Kansas children and parents. If you are sitting in a math class, either there is something to
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 03:26 PM
Aug 2015

this, or you are too stupid for words for sitting in a math class believing what you are told. And the parents ought to be charged with child neglect, for putting you on this plantation.

Or maybe math is a science they should pay attention to...and just maybe you should all stay home until Kansas delivers the goods. (That will cost them Federal funds every day you aren't there - get you some attention).

The reason this is important is because your parents may have voted differently, and if they are going to show you by example how to just sit, do nothing, and take it, perhaps as they were taught, we shouldn't be surprised if that's what we get from you in the future.

Time to get uppity in the face of the Kansas "officials" and help the mathematician out.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
12. someone may be registering people who never vote and mailing in groups of votes.
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 03:44 PM
Aug 2015
“This is not a random distribution. We are seeing a very definite trend here that the larger the precinct is, the higher the percentage of the Republican vote is.”

Stevepol

(4,234 posts)
20. I'm located about 2 minutes away from Koch Central, the US headquarters
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 04:29 PM
Aug 2015

though I doubt they're around very much. They're too busy trying to corrupt politicians that aren't yet completely corrupt. In KS I'm afraid the Republicans own everything. In this last election, if it were possible to find out what the "real" results were, I would bet that the Independent actually won the senatorial race and the Dem actually won the gubernatorial race. Kobach might have wono his re-election but he didn't win by 17% as recorded on the machines. I would bet almost any amount of money on that.

All the political pundits everywhere ignore the voting machines. People think you're crazy to even suggest that the voting machines might be compromised. Even Mitofsky, the pollster, immediately decided that the exit polls must have been wrong because they indicated that Kerry won the 04 election. Why? He came up with the Reluctant Bush Responder theory, that the Republicans were less likely to respond to exit polling, and so refused to participate. No evidence for this theory whatever. The only evidence in its favor is that the exit polls recorded more Kerry votes than the actual results. Ergo, it must be the Reluctant Bush Responder. If an election goes one way, it's considered gospel truth and pundits don't look over at the pretty voting machines. They have the same machines that keep track of your bank account, that give you a receipt at the grocery store. What could be the problem?

I'll tell you the problem: When my bank sends me a bank statement printed out by Diebold, I CAN CHECK WHETHER THEIR FIGURES ARE CORRECT OR NOT ON PAPER. I GET THE PAPER TO LOOK AT AND VERIFY.

With the voting machines, you can't verify ANYTHING. Maybe one or two states provide for a procedure for some verification.

People wonder why there are so many crazies in Congress. MAYBE THEY SHOULD LOOK AT THE VOTING MACHINES!!!

Botany

(70,581 posts)
39. From what I have heard and read even the republicans in Kansas don't like Brownback
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 05:53 PM
Aug 2015

..... and they along w/many others were surprised when he won re-election.

CrispyQ

(36,509 posts)
81. Our instant gratification society doesn't help. And the media?
Wed Aug 26, 2015, 11:14 AM
Aug 2015

They are hugely guilty of this, always wanting to be the first network to call the winner, & in some cases, even if they're wrong.

My county has paper ballots, but they are scanned into a tabulator. Well, there you go - once the vote is digital, it's easier to manipulate. We need paper ballots & to take the time to count them. Okay, so you won't know the winner for a few days. Big deal. The prez doesn't get inaugurated until January anyway, so what the fuck is a few days?

I'm already sick of the 2016 election & it's over a year away. I'm surprised Americans don't demand a law with shorter election cycles. It's insane.

Hannahcares

(118 posts)
15. Problem with increased Republican votes in larger precincts
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 04:09 PM
Aug 2015

This pattern of increasing Republican votes in larger precincts was discussed at length in the 2012 elections. A number of very rigorous papers by well-respected statisticians were released at the time. Will try to find and post links. This is a huge potential problem for the 2016 elections.

Botany

(70,581 posts)
16. I believe some of Clarkson's work also showed an unusual vote pattern for Wisconsin too
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 04:15 PM
Aug 2015

I will never believe that Walker won his recall election fair and square. Both Madison
and Milwuakee turned out heavy and those were the key metrics to watch to see
if the vote was going to be tough on Walker but "bingo" the vote came in and Walker
stayed in power. I watched the recall process as well as could and I noticed that some
very red counties in N.W. Wisconsin had almost as many people signing the recall petition
then voted for Walker in the previous election.

Time after time we have seen or caught the republicans cheating in the counting of the vote,
making it hard for "the wrong people to vote," or screaming about "voter fraud" in order to
get voter ID laws or to run software programs * that stop people from voting twice which doesn't
happen and still our "liberal media," the state and national democratic party, or the DoJ doesn't
say or do shit.

Republicans cheat, end of story.

* http://www.democraticunderground.com/1016106761

glinda

(14,807 posts)
90. Poisoned water and now they want the Lake's water.....
Wed Aug 26, 2015, 05:20 PM
Aug 2015

they did it to themselves. Do the Koch's have an office or something there? It is the most conservative County in WI. What are the chances that this is where the water wars concerning privatization will start?

Jerry442

(1,265 posts)
17. I'd say the Kochs et al...
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 04:16 PM
Aug 2015

...feel the need to win this one even if there is no underlying fraud. They want the precedent set that state officials don't have to give out voting data to anyone ever.

 

staggerleem

(469 posts)
18. Looks like Kansas needs to do what Wisconsin has already done.
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 04:17 PM
Aug 2015

Repeal their Open Records act. Why does the public need the ability to examine trivial stuff like voting records anyway? We've already told them that we won - what more do these fools want??!!

I've gotta wonder is we'll be hearing about a "John Doe" investigation in Kansas any time soon?

KrazyinKS

(291 posts)
19. Saw that in the Wichita Eagle this morning-
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 04:28 PM
Aug 2015

I think she is going to go after them. I hope. As far as the Koch Bros. I drove down 37th finally a few days back. Koch Engineering is on that street between Hillside and Oliver. It used to be the buildings were on the south side and the parking is on the north side. No longer, they rerouted 37th, it curves now, and you have to go past a guard shack a big gate to get to the parking and walk to the buildings, and their is a huge fence all the way around it. That was the first time I noticed that. Hmmmmm-

Tatiana

(14,167 posts)
21. Glad to see someone is digging. Ms. Clarkson has maybe noticed something a little iffy?
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 04:38 PM
Aug 2015

Either Kobach has something to hide (almost certainly) or he is carrying water for his party and not wanting to open up the door to for other corrupt Republicans to have their crimes uncovered (probably that too).

 

chapdrum

(930 posts)
22. Shades of Ohio in 2004
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 04:42 PM
Aug 2015

The same state that had its then-Secretary of State Kenneth Blackwell operating as chair for Bush-Cheney in that state.
Recall that Stephen Connell, owner of a company called GovTech that was involved in vote logistics, was called to testify regarding discrepancies in tallying. A few days before the hearing, he crashed while piloting his plane.

http://freepress.org/departments/display/19/2011/4239

markpkessinger

(8,401 posts)
23. Prediction . . .
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 04:43 PM
Aug 2015

. . . this will be fought out in the courts and eventually appealed to the Kansas Supreme Court, where Clarkson's suit will be dismissed for lack of standing.

tech3149

(4,452 posts)
34. Unfortunately, I expect you're right
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 05:41 PM
Aug 2015

After decades of stacking the courts with Federalist Society sorts, there is little chance that an honest decision would be made.

tblue37

(65,487 posts)
40. The Kansas SC still has some decent judges left over from Democratic administrations. That
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 05:59 PM
Aug 2015

is why Brownback is threatening to totally defund the court if it keeps trying to force him to follow the law instead of playing dictator:

Kansas Governor Sam Brownback threatens to defund judiciary if it rules against him

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://www.slate.com/blogs/the_slatest/2015/06/08/kansas_governor_sam_brownback_threatens_to_defund_judiciary_if_it_rules.html&ved=0CB8QFjAAahUKEwjIxc6UnMXHAhXFkw0KHfuNCJI&usg=AFQjCNEWMJEbyBTqAosi7UJZQDPsRttcxA&sig2=UEW4XxyNhGoCSu_jTm3utw

On Thursday, Kansas Gov. Sam Brownback signed a bill that threatens the entire state's judiciary with destruction if it rules against a law he favors. Brownback has spent much of his tenure attempting to curb the state supreme court and consolidate power in the executive branch. Thursday's startling maneuver suggests the deeply conservative governor has no compunction about simply obliterating separation of powers when another branch of government gets in his way.

The Kansas trouble started in 2014, when the state supreme court ruled that the disparity between school funding in rich and poor districts violated the state constitution. The justices ordered the legislature to fix the problem. Soon after, the legislature passed an administrative law that stripped the supreme court of its authority to appoint local chief judges and set district court budgets. (Instead, district court judges—who are often quite conservative—were allowed to elect their own chief judge.)

Arriving shortly after the school funding ruling, this law was widely seen as a retaliation against the court—and a warning. In their first ruling, the justices stopped short of declaring that the school system as a whole was constitutionally underfunded. But the court acknowledged that it would one day answer that question. And if the justices mandate more school funding, the legislature will have to raise taxes, a step few legislators are eager to take.

The administrative law, then, was likely an effort to scare the court out of issuing a dramatic ruling in favor of greater school funding. Just in case the court didn't get the message, Brownback and the legislature have also threatened the justices with blatantly political reforms, like subjecting them to recall elections, splitting the court in two, lowering the retirement age, and introducing partisan elections. (Currently, a nominating commission creates a pool of candidates, and the governor selects from that bunch.)

{SNIP}

blackspade

(10,056 posts)
25. Really....
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 04:53 PM
Aug 2015
Kobach contends records sought by Wichita State University mathematician Beth Clarkson aren’t subject to the Kansas open records act, and their disclosure’s prohibited under state law


Well then Kobach can quote the statutes then.....crickets.....

kacekwl

(7,021 posts)
26. Seems awfully strange not only is this
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 05:05 PM
Aug 2015

Not front page news every where but that there are no democrats holding press conferences demanding these records be released. Debbie Wasserman where are you ?

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
37. Wasserman's already working overtime
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 05:48 PM
Aug 2015

to make sure Sanders is NOT the Democratic nominee.

She's got NO time left to insure that the ReThuglicans don't steal more elections.

dorkzilla

(5,141 posts)
54. the woman is usless
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 11:10 PM
Aug 2015

Every time I think about how she did nothing to support Chris Christie's opponent in the last gubernatorial race I see red. And I'm not even from Jersey!

She's a moron.

MuseRider

(34,119 posts)
27. OK you posters down Wichita way
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 05:08 PM
Aug 2015

I live South of Topeka. I do not recall, and maybe my mind is too blurry with the national stuff right now, that the election officials in your county were in this before. Did they just get into the mix?

Ms. Lehman if this is true, "Sedgwick County’s Election Commissioner contends supplying the voting logs is “unnecessarily burdensome” because they’re hard to copy.", perhaps the job is too much for you and you should consider stepping down before you have to deal with another election.

I would go after her with all you have. An ELECTION is just to hard to verify? BS, just BS and she needs to be taken to task by you all in her county.

Turbineguy

(37,365 posts)
30. Hmmm...... maybe......
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 05:14 PM
Aug 2015

if they refuse to release the records, nobody would ever suspect them of cheating!

Of course, every day you stay in power is a small victory!

LonePirate

(13,431 posts)
31. Kobach is only interested in voter fraud, not election fraud. Two completely different things.
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 05:21 PM
Aug 2015

I would love to hear/see the local press question him about his keen interest in voter fraud while blocking research into election fraud.

 

99th_Monkey

(19,326 posts)
32. This is the tiny tip a very ugly iceberg
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 05:33 PM
Aug 2015

Why in the world -- after nearly 7 years of a Democratic admin. -- is this shit
still polluting what's left of our democracy?

tblue37

(65,487 posts)
38. To protect corporatist Democratic incumbents from awkward primary challenges from the left.
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 05:49 PM
Aug 2015

I imagine there is either an overt or a covert understanding, too, that some of the long term "moderate" i.e., either conservative or center-right Dem incumbents) will not be too forcefully challenged by Republican candidates as long as they don't rock the hackable voting machine boat. Our system is pervasively rigged, but it's been handled a bit less obviously than giving the candidates the 99% the way Third World dictators tend to do.

tblue37

(65,487 posts)
91. No--this nonsense goes on all over the country. The woman who spotted the hinky discrepancy
Wed Aug 26, 2015, 06:23 PM
Aug 2015

just happens to be in Kansas and spotting the numbers in a recent Kansas election in which the results defied explanation and drastically countered what the polls were showing.

 

rhett o rick

(55,981 posts)
46. This is a great article but may meet the definition of a Conspiracy Theory.
Tue Aug 25, 2015, 08:34 PM
Aug 2015

But I think CT have gotten a bad rap. We need to pay attention to some. Of course we don't want the site cluttered with crazy-ass stuff, but open-minded liberals can tell the difference. But some like to use the fear of CT to advance their own agenda by only alerting on CT that doesn't match their world view.

Lodestar

(2,388 posts)
59. I think polls are also being manipulated
Wed Aug 26, 2015, 02:25 AM
Aug 2015

which, when you think about it, is an acceptable tool used by the media and
politicians to tell America what they think. A VERY powerful tool, and yet polls are so unreliable and malleable.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
61. Going to take some people who never registered to vote, to check and find out..'someone' registered
Wed Aug 26, 2015, 05:19 AM
Aug 2015

them and voted (used mail-in)

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
62. what percent of the USA population never votes? 30%? or is it even higher?
Wed Aug 26, 2015, 05:36 AM
Aug 2015

IMO, I don't think its the machines that change the 'final counts', but some of the ballots submitted (early vote?/"helper" votes?/mail-in votes?, are fraud votes.

TrollBuster9090

(5,955 posts)
70. This story is HUGE, and needs to go NATIONAL ASAP!
Wed Aug 26, 2015, 09:09 AM
Aug 2015

My only regret is that I can only recommend it ONCE.

When Clarkson noticed the funny numbers, it was big. But now that Kobach is trying to BLOCK an inquiry into them....it's become HUGE.

mother earth

(6,002 posts)
76. K & R, sketchy! But of course, the larger the precinct the higher the republican steal...it's the
Wed Aug 26, 2015, 10:29 AM
Aug 2015

way they win, without the steal, they've got nothing!

Why isn't the public outcry deafening...because so many voters know their votes aren't counted, and the voices have been replaced by big money buying all the influence they need to keep scamming & pillaging. Where is our Congress? In their pockets...passing through the golden revolving door...and the dance continues...

They_Live

(3,240 posts)
87. That's right
Wed Aug 26, 2015, 02:33 PM
Aug 2015

The only way they win is through dishonest means. Lying, voter disenfranchisement, shady redistricting, and easily manipulated e-voting.

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
84. Where theres smoke...
Wed Aug 26, 2015, 01:50 PM
Aug 2015

theres fire!

It will be sooo sweet to see republicans busted for vote fraud, a crime they accuse democrats of 24/7!

Vinca

(50,303 posts)
85. Now why would someone object the the release of this boring, boring data?
Wed Aug 26, 2015, 01:54 PM
Aug 2015

Hmmm . . . I wonder. It couldn't possibly be the real voter fraud takes place within the machines rather than by a sole voter in a booth.

nashville_brook

(20,958 posts)
89. holycrap. just not going to give up the voting records...the most fundamental proof of democracy
Wed Aug 26, 2015, 03:40 PM
Aug 2015

nope. can't have 'em.

pfft.

 

RobertEarl

(13,685 posts)
92. What counts the votes?
Wed Aug 26, 2015, 09:10 PM
Aug 2015

Private owned computers that are safe from examined by people.

Now we know why R's win so many elections.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Kobach and Sedgwick Count...