Cardin to oppose Iran nuclear deal
Source: Baltimore Sun
Sen. Ben Cardin, the top-ranking Democrat on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, said Friday he will oppose the nuclear agreement with Iran a position that won't stop the deal but is a setback for supporters who want to keep a Republican resolution of disapproval from reaching the White House.
The Maryland lawmaker cited concerns with the inspections regime called for in the agreement, the difficulty world leaders may have reimposing sanctions, and the fact that Tehran will not be required to disclose its past efforts to build a nuclear weapon.
"There's high risk in both directions, but I think the risk is higher in the long run by going forward with this agreement," Cardin told The Baltimore Sun. "There is no reason to believe that Iran won't continue its past activities."
<snip>
Cardin, who was under intense pressure from deal supporters and opponents, dismissed any suggestion that his timing was politically motivated. Instead, he said, he was deliberately working his way through the details. That's consistent with the way Cardin has approached tough issues in the past, when he has often deliberated until just days before the vote.
<snip>
Read more: http://www.baltimoresun.com/news/maryland/politics/bs-md-cardin-iran-20150904-story.html
tabasco
(22,974 posts)Gutless politicians, like Cardin, fail to "do the right thing" but do what they think they have to do to keep their job - even though they know better. The only "risk" Cardin cares about is the risk of not getting re-elected.
Dawson Leery
(19,348 posts)Purveyor
(29,876 posts)totodeinhere
(13,058 posts)waited until there are already enough votes to sustain veto.
GitRDun
(1,846 posts)Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)their own President.
Some will need reminding their oath of office and allegiance was given to America, not Israel.
ProgressiveJarhead
(172 posts)religion over common sense and the POTUS. They choose to submit to the lobbyists for another nation. Their job is to put U.S. interests first. In this case, they fail to do so. It is possible to separate being Jewish and supporting Israel unconditionally.
Response to ProgressiveJarhead (Reply #8)
Post removed
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)MrBig
(640 posts)I shouldn't be surprised - you're just so open and brazen about it, it's a little disgusting.
MrBig
(640 posts)On Sat Sep 5, 2015, 06:22 AM you sent an alert on the following post:
Way too many Democratic Party Jewish Senators and Jewish Congressmen have openly chosen religion over common sense and
http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1014&pid=1199126
REASON FOR ALERT
This post is disruptive, hurtful, rude, insensitive, over-the-top, or otherwise inappropriate.
YOUR COMMENTS
Blatant anti-Semitic nonsense which is the norm from this poster. Dual loyalty claims. It's ridiculous
JURY RESULTS
A randomly-selected Jury of DU members completed their review of this alert at Sat Sep 5, 2015, 06:36 AM, and voted 3-4 to LEAVE IT ALONE.
Juror #1 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #2 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #3 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: This poster does seem to have been reading "Protocols of the Elders of Zion" a little too fervently...
Juror #4 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #5 voted to LEAVE IT ALONE
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #6 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: No explanation given
Juror #7 voted to HIDE IT
Explanation: This type of anti-Semitism is a violation of TOS and should be addressed by the admins to the whole of DU! Where are the attacks on Menendez? At what point does this part of the TOS "it also includes any post asserting disloyalty by Jewish Americans" actually get enforced?
villager
(26,001 posts)...that's allowed to stand, though if similar comments were made based on gender, race, etc., they'd be hidden 6-1, or 7-0.
The very fact that "Jew baiting" here is the "perfectly acceptable prejudice" precisely proves how blindered everyone is to it.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)And a double standard it is. As I will now demonstrate:
"Way too many Democratic Party (Christian) Senators and (Christian) Congressmen have openly chosen religion over common sense and their own President.
Some will need reminding their oath of office and allegiance was given to America, not Israel."
That would never be alerted on or considered "anti-Christian" or offensive or in any way a concern......am I right.
I repeat....why the double standard??
villager
(26,001 posts)No different than those in the 60's convinced Kennedy was taking his orders from the Vatican, since he was Catholic.
You conflate being Jewish with uncritically supporting Likudnik policies. Of course there are Jews who do (just as there are Christians who do). And there are plenty of Jews who don't.
It's like saying all Muslims are terrorists, etc.
And I'm sick of it, sick of your insinuations, and sick of how DU has coddled you, which they wouldn't, if it was some target other than "the Jews."
You're an anti-Semite, and you're now on my ignore list.
DU may follow shortly.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Totally unable to refute logic...resort to personal attacks...how pedestrian!
But you will not see my reply....even better!
MrBig
(640 posts)oberliner
(58,724 posts)You don't really see it with Christian politicians for some reason, only Jewish ones.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)You said:
"You don't really see it with Christian politicians for some reason, only Jewish ones."
oberliner
(58,724 posts)It was meant in general terms - that one sees the dual loyalty thing in relation to Jewish politicians generally speaking.
Edit to add:
For example it came up a lot with Joe Lieberman - whereas not so much with other non-Jewish politicians who had the same views as him with respect to Israel.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)MrBig
(640 posts)I choose to read more than post on this site. I find it more educational to learn from others and try to only say something when I feel I have something useful to add.
Why didn't you mention how long I've been a member? Because it didn't fit the conclusion you were trying to draw?
bananas
(27,509 posts)nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)you are going for the double allegiance crap, to other nations of course.
By the way, there are a bunch of NON JEWS also saying NYET to this. Why not call them that? Oh wait. this trope only applies to Jews who are never loyal, right? RIGHT!
To the potential jurors, answering to a classic antisemitic trope. This poster is less and less coded in his antisemitic posts.
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Try your magic decoder ring on that!
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)When you know what you are reading. It is ancient Fred
branford
(4,462 posts)Jews, including Jewish elected representatives, can oppose the Iran deal without it having anything to do with religion or other patently antisemitic canards such as purported loyalty to a foreign state.
Given the current polling and declared or anticipated votes, there sure are a whole lot non-Jews who are either mind-controlled by those dastardly Jews or apparently have foreign allegiances, including Senator Menendez.
It's when I read and hear such ridiculous, bigoted garbage, often tolerated on a purportedly liberal, Democratic website, that I begin to question my lifelong Democratic Party registration.
http://www.pollingreport.com/iran.htm
AnAzulTexas
(108 posts)so what grand ideas would you like to propose, senator cardin? you petty schmuck
villager
(26,001 posts)You can support the Iran deal, and still be a flaming asshole, evidently.
AnAzulTexas
(108 posts)villager
(26,001 posts)No worries.
AnAzulTexas
(108 posts)had to take a break
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)Or purchase unlimited amounts of political advertising and punditry on behalf of a foreign government and threaten American politicians with political consequences if the lobby for the foreign government is not obeyed??
And get away with reliably sounding the familiar and worn-out anti-religious alarm at anyone who might object?
davidpdx
(22,000 posts)I would expect we will see more senators come out in opposition now that 34 have come out in favor and can sustain an override of a veto.
I'm going on record now that I think Oregon Senator Ron Wyden will oppose it. I just have a gut feeling he's going to get cover from the party to vote no.
lark
(23,105 posts)This is why I refuse to donate to the DNC, or DSCC, they are run by folks like Schumer and Wasserman Schultz who care more for doing little murderers bidding than they do the health and welfare of our country and the world. Plus Schumer is responsible for Alito and Roberts getting on the court. DINOS need to be replaced by people who actually prioritize peace and prosperity for all Americans, not just the 1%.
Kath1
(4,309 posts)Thank you, Barbara Mikulski, for stepping up.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)Scary that such crap is allowed on DU. And that juries do not see fit to hide.
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)villager
(26,001 posts)n/t
nadinbrzezinski
(154,021 posts)Doctor_J
(36,392 posts)As someone said above, this is why people don't like politicians.