It's the closest thing that he can do to put a woman in her place when the cameras are rolling. He's showing that her opinion doesn't really matter. And, of course, trying to rattle her.

the only problem is that Richards is very well focused and sharp. She was probably warned that there would be an attempt to make her very mad and then they could say she was an "angry woman."

Well, that sure didn't work, did it?

Thank goodness she had a reliable team to back her up.

If it hadn't been for her fact-checker, that idiot Congressman would have had the soundbite he was looking for.

Now, the Democratic netizens should launch a strong offense, asking why that Congressman said that slide came from planned parenthood, when it didn't.

The R's looked downright mean, foolish and bad mannered.

Now that I'm older than a lot of them, I would have said something like, "Sir, who was your mother and did she not teach you basic manners?"

and I'm sending $ to PPH

a kangaroo court. Chaffetz did well. Always remember, it's important that we keep from learning any facts.

They are not "hearings" at all. They are only for show for the rubes back home.

No. Shut the fuck up. You are distracting from the issue I want to rant on.

... not because he HAS a venereal disease, but because he IS a venereal disease.

Republican-dominated committee "hearings" have become Soviet-style show trials.