President Barack Obama Backs Away From US Law To Access Encrypted Information
Source: Reuters
U.S. President Barack Obama's administration has backed away from seeking legislation that would give U.S. law-enforcement agencies access to individuals' encrypted messages, the White House said Saturday. "We are actively engaged with private companies to ensure they understand the public-safety and national-security risks that result from malicious actors use of their encrypted products and services," said White House representative Mark Stroh. "However, the administration is not seeking legislation at this time."
Stroh reiterated comments by FBI Director James Comey, who in testifying before a Senate committee Thursday said the administration would not seek a bill allowing it to crack into encrypted information. "Changing forms of Internet communication and the use of encryption are posing real challenges to the FBIs ability to fulfill its public-safety and national-security missions," Comey warned.
The tech industry, through groups representing the likes of Apple Inc., Facebook Inc., Google Inc., IBM and Microsoft Corp., this year resisted any administration moves to weaken increasingly sophisticated encryption systems designed to protect consumers' privacy.
The decision to back away from a law that would have companies turn over encrypted data to the federal government came from fears that the information would then be vulnerable to hackers, the New York Times reported Saturday.
Read more: http://www.ibtimes.com/president-barack-obama-backs-away-us-law-access-encrypted-information-2136099
Fred Sanders
(23,946 posts)joshcryer
(62,270 posts)NutmegYankee
(16,199 posts)Sorry there Freddy, Liberty won this battle.
Downwinder
(12,869 posts)they are going to drive the Internet underground. Everybody but commercial enterprises will be on TOR
Demeter
(85,373 posts)Maybe he's feeling the Bern.
There aren't words sufficiently civil to express what I feel about this man and his service to the Military/Industrial/Espionage Complex, and the Banksters, too.
cprise
(8,445 posts)dixiegrrrrl
(60,010 posts)"came from fears that the information would then be vulnerable to hackers,"
as the article pointed out.
NOT because it was the right thing to do for us.