Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
Wed Oct 21, 2015, 04:01 AM Oct 2015

New guidelines urge later, less frequent mammograms

Source: Boston Globe

Most women should wait until age 45 to start getting annual mammograms and should cut back to every-other-year testing at 55, the American Cancer Society advised Tuesday in a major shift in its guidelines for breast cancer screening.

Until now, the group — one of the most respected voices on cancer — urged women to get yearly mammograms from 40 onward. But studies have shown that mammograms, even when they detect tumors, have little effect on whether a young woman will die of breast cancer.

About “85 percent of women in their 40s and 50s who die of breast cancer would have died regardless of mammography,” Drs. Nancy Keating and Lydia Pace of Brigham and Women’s Hospital wrote in an editorial accompanying the new guidelines published in the Journal of the American Medical Association.

The cancer society also recommended for the first time that women forgo breast exams performed by their doctor because they are not as effective as mammograms at finding tumors.

Read more: https://www.bostonglobe.com/lifestyle/health-wellness/2015/10/20/american-cancer-society-advises-women-start-mammograms-later-and-get-fewer-tests/bccqMFKgZ8sg43BUbuSXqJ/story.html

3 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
New guidelines urge later, less frequent mammograms (Original Post) Recursion Oct 2015 OP
So early dectection is not important now? canoeist52 Oct 2015 #1
Yes, it turns out to not actually save lives Recursion Oct 2015 #2
This is what the NIH has been saying for years. sybylla Oct 2015 #3

canoeist52

(2,282 posts)
1. So early dectection is not important now?
Wed Oct 21, 2015, 06:53 AM
Oct 2015

So no manual breast exams AND half the amount of mammograms - Sounds to me like insurance companies don't want to pay f them, now that they're free through the ACA law. It's always about cost-cutting.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
2. Yes, it turns out to not actually save lives
Wed Oct 21, 2015, 07:42 AM
Oct 2015

That's the whole point: despite much, much higher levels of early detection the death rate from breast cancer hasn't actually gone down in the past 4 decades, so the panel decided it's not worth the risks of the excess procedures that come with it (i.e., some non-zero number of women die from complications from the follow-ups).

sybylla

(8,509 posts)
3. This is what the NIH has been saying for years.
Wed Oct 21, 2015, 10:03 AM
Oct 2015

It's what I told my doctor when they wanted to go to yearly mammograms. I have no family history of it nor lifestyle factors. I saw no reason to have them more often than the NIH recommended.

On the other hand, the medical industrial complex probably has a pretty big sad today.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»New guidelines urge later...