Islamic State claims responsibility for Bangladesh bombings on Shias
Source: The Time of India
Islamic State (ISIS) has claimed responsibility for bombings that targeted Shias in Dhaka, the capital of Bangladesh, on Saturday, the monitor group SITE said.
It cited Islamic State as saying "soldiers of the Caliphate in Bangladesh" detonated explosive devices in Dhaka during "polytheist rituals". Islamic State an ultra-hardline Sunni Muslim group that sees Shias as apostates claimed responsibility for the attack.
Read more: http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/world/south-asia/Islamic-State-claims-responsibility-for-Bangladesh-bombings-on-Shias/articleshow/49517781.cms
Are we concerned about what ISIS is doing in other countries besides Syria? It's time that we demand that our "allies", including Saudi Arabia, Qatar and Turkey stop funding or otherwise facilitating ISIS's reign or terror against civilians.
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)in India and Pakistan things could get very dicey very quickly.
IronLionZion
(45,529 posts)and domestic hate group activity is on the rise in India after Modi's election. Like they need any excuse. Right wing groups are gaining popularity on an anti-Islam platform in Europe.
Some of them think the world is long overdue for some "cleansing". ISIS/terrorism makes for a very convenient excuse
Botany
(70,582 posts)Those mother fuckers just had to get in there and mess things up.
IronLionZion
(45,529 posts)and he had limited reach even within his borders. He was contained.
ISIS has no borders or limits to their reach. This problem is way more difficult.
Botany
(70,582 posts)a massive problem.
BTW this is from Thom Hartman
# of suicide car bombings in Iraq prior to 2003 = 0
uawchild
(2,208 posts)I have heard people call Assad a "moderate" "secular" dictator. Seriously, I have. The sad thing is, when compared to ISIS one can start to see why some people say those things.
Comrade Grumpy
(13,184 posts)It protected ethnic and religious minorities.
Here is a paragraph from Charles Glass in the New York Review of Books that sums it up:
"The only forces fighting with success against the Assad regime are Sunni Moslem holy warriors who are destroying all that was best in Syria: its mosaic of different sects and ethnic communities--including Druze, Christians, Turkmen, Yazidis, and Kurds, along with Alawites and Sunni Arabs--its heritage of ancient monuments, its ancient manuscripts and Sumerian tablets, its industrial and social infrastructure, and its tolerance of different social customs. 'The worst thing is not the violence,' the Armenian Orthodox primate of Syria told me. 'It is this new hatred.'"
FrodosPet
(5,169 posts)But this has been developing for the last 1400 years ago, and really ramped up in March 1928 with the founding of the Muslim Brotherhood.
Saddam and sons were dead men walking. Even if we had completely stayed away, they would have been deposed, with an inevitable civil war, within a few years. You are giving the neocons way too much credit if you think they created this problem all by themselves.
Yes, it would have been nice if we could be sitting back, preserving our national treasure, reputation, and lives, watching in peace while the Middle East devolved into the hell it has been headed towards for the last 14 centuries.
Botany
(70,582 posts)I'm Sorry : Blair Takes Blame For Iraq War And Admits conflict Caused The rise Of ISIS
http://www.democraticunderground.com/10141242123
Jesus Malverde
(10,274 posts)The house of Saud. Leading financiers of terror in the world.
If ever there was someone to drone.
hollowdweller
(4,229 posts)NonMetro
(631 posts)Not sure what to make of this. Would there be a reason for ISIS to claim responsibility even if they weren't involved? Bangladesh is a long way from Iraq!
romanic
(2,841 posts)They're claiming responsibility to make themselves look like their "power" reaches that far. More than likely, it was a lone wolf (or wolves) who bought ISIS' hardline Islamic bullcrap and ran with it and blew shit up.