Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

uawchild

(2,208 posts)
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 08:35 AM Oct 2015

White House urges Congress to pass budget compromise reached by leaders

Source: Reuters

The White House said on Tuesday it urged members of Congress from both parties to pass a budget based on an agreement reached on Monday night by congressional leaders that would lift mandatory sequestration cuts on both defense and domestic spending.

A White House official said the compromise deal would protect Social Security and Medicare beneficiaries from cuts.

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/2015/10/27/us-usa-fiscal-white-house-idUSKCN0SL1CH20151027

9 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
White House urges Congress to pass budget compromise reached by leaders (Original Post) uawchild Oct 2015 OP
The devil is in the details Kelvin Mace Oct 2015 #1
Those on Medicare and SSDI get screwed LastLiberal in PalmSprings Oct 2015 #2
It is just triangulation at work. Think nothing of it. jwirr Oct 2015 #3
Right. In my local paper it was reported question everything Oct 2015 #5
So, the debt limit is being raised by cutting the $ that disabled people get? lark Oct 2015 #4
No, that's not the tradeoff. geek tragedy Oct 2015 #9
You have seen preview Robbins Oct 2015 #6
No, that's not correct, as anyone who's familiar with the actual terms geek tragedy Oct 2015 #8
Post removed Post removed Oct 2015 #7
 

Kelvin Mace

(17,469 posts)
1. The devil is in the details
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 09:30 AM
Oct 2015

If both sides favor it, somebody is about to be screwed big time. Off the top of my head it would be the taxpayer in that they are getting ready to sell 58 million barrels of oil at a dirt cheap price, well below what it cost to buy.

question everything

(47,476 posts)
5. Right. In my local paper it was reported
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 01:14 PM
Oct 2015

raise military budget and domestic programs but reduce social security disability payments and medicare reimbursements to health care providers. As it is the reimbursements is pathetic. Why would anyone even want to accept Medicare patients?

lark

(23,099 posts)
4. So, the debt limit is being raised by cutting the $ that disabled people get?
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 01:08 PM
Oct 2015

For shame Congressional leaders and Obama, for shame.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
9. No, that's not the tradeoff.
Wed Oct 28, 2015, 09:50 AM
Oct 2015
http://www.nytimes.com/2015/10/28/us/politics/obama-boehner-budget-deal.html?_r=0

For this fiscal year alone, the deal would add $50 billion in spending, divided equally between defense and domestic programs, as well as $16 billion for emergency war spending, half for the military, half for the State Department. Together, that represents an increase of $66 billion above the spending limits for 2016, not far off the $70 billion increase Mr. Obama requested.

From the moment he introduced his budget Feb. 2, Mr. Obama held firm on his demand that Congress break through the punishing across-the-board cuts known as sequestration in the Budget Control Act to provide equal increases to domestic and military spending. He promised to veto any spending bill that adhered to the statutory spending caps, made good on that threat this month by vetoing a popular defense policy bill, enlisted the support of congressional Democrats with whom his White House had sometimes sparred on budget matters, and capitalized on Republican divisions to get his way.

Senate Democrats created an impenetrable wall for Republicans determined to stick to the caps, filibustering the spending bills that reached the Senate floor and threatening to block the ones that did not. House Democrats stayed in lock step with Mr. Obama as well, with Representative Nancy Pelosi of California, the minority leader, promising that her troops would sustain the president’s veto.

The result was a deal that would raise spending $80 billion, or about 1 percent, over the next two years while enacting an array of cuts that Democrats found palatable. The deal also would suspend the statutory debt limit — on track to be breached on Tuesday without action from Congress — until March 2017, beyond his presidency. It also contains a provision Ms. Pelosi had pressed for to avert large Medicare premium increases for some beneficiaries.

Robbins

(5,066 posts)
6. You have seen preview
Tue Oct 27, 2015, 01:26 PM
Oct 2015

of what a clinton presidency would be like.more cutting of social safety net to fund more war.

Democrats have totally sold out the disabled and seniors.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
8. No, that's not correct, as anyone who's familiar with the actual terms
Wed Oct 28, 2015, 09:47 AM
Oct 2015

would tell you.

This deal was pretty much the best possible deal that could be reached with Republicans controlling Congress--Obama wound up giving up very little in return for what he got.

Response to uawchild (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»White House urges Congres...