The Latest: Police tear down protesters' camp in Minneapolis
Source: AP
MINNEAPOLIS (AP) The latest developments in the fatal shooting of a black man by Minneapolis police that has sparked nearly two weeks of demonstrations (all times local):
6:15 a.m.
Officers in riot gear have broken down an encampment outside a Minneapolis precinct where protesters have been demonstrating for nearly two weeks following the fatal shooting of a black man by police.
City dump trucks carried away tents and supplies from outside the 4th Precinct early Thursday. Demonstrators headed by the local Black Lives Matter group had gathered at the site since 24-year-old Jamar Clark was shot in a Nov. 15 confrontation with police. He died the next day.
FULL short story at link.
Read more: http://bigstory.ap.org/article/3ac233b94eee4459bdc666dacf635d92/latest-police-tear-down-protesters-camp-minneapolis
90-percent
(6,829 posts)The authorities at first glance appear to be following the "stomp down Occupy Wall Street" law enforcement model?
Don't they have any Free Speech Zones on the outskirts of town they can send these silly First Amendment Fundamentalists off to?
-90% Jimmy
StoneCarver
(249 posts)stupidity on DU has reached new heights. The Mayor, Betsy Hodges, has offered the protesters open land adjacent or a parking lot across the street to continue their protests -peacefully. They can't continue to block an arterial street with fires in it indefinitely. We all have first amendment rights, but they have limits. Ambulances, fire trucks, etc couldn't get to where they needed to be in a reasonable time.
I wish people would wait until the investigation is done before they started popping off. Once you have facts, then you have power. Until then, it's just an opinion. Even Keith Ellison (first black Muslim elected to House) is calling for an end to it.
Stonecarver
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.
Amendment I
Waldorf
(654 posts)sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)doesn't say a thing about blocking a public street or annoying people, or the right to conduct commerce or there being a time limit or a First Amendment zone or anything other than the protest be peaceful. That is why the image of riot police descending on peaceful demonstrators is so disturbing. I think it is fairly clear that the rights of people to assemble and to petition their government for redress transcends the right of the public or the authorities not to be inconvenienced.
randys1
(16,286 posts)destruction \