Appeals court leaves EPA mercury pollution rule in effect
Source: AP
By SAM HANANEL
WASHINGTON (AP) An appeals court has agreed to leave intact a federal rule targeting mercury pollution while government officials decide how to account for its costs.
The ruling Tuesday is a win for the Obama administration, which is working to quickly fix legal problems with the rule and reissue it by April 15.
The Supreme Court ruled in a 5-4 decision in June that the Environmental Protection Agency should have considered the costs and benefits of its plan before deciding to impose limits on mercury and other hazardous air pollutants. But the justices let the rule stay in effect and returned it to the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit to decide how a cost-benefits analysis should be conducted.
Twenty-one states and several industry groups had asked the court to halt the plan. They argued that power plants and their customers should not have to bear the hefty costs of installing and operating equipment to remove the pollutants while the legal underpinnings of the rule remain in doubt.
FULL story at link.
Read more: http://bigstory.ap.org/article/e4b518da7c7246b590fe7ecea1737e67/appeals-court-leaves-epa-mercury-rule-effect
RoccoR5955
(12,471 posts)What is the cost of increased healthcare for those affected by this mercury pollution?
THAT is the only cost that the legislature should be considering.
proverbialwisdom
(4,959 posts)houston16revival
(953 posts)I can tell you the costs are unmeasureable
Lost decades, lost income, doctors who haven't a clue, not to mention
the costs of the meager and quasi-effective treatments, because there
is no known or quick cure. It's not like having a bacterial infection, where
you take an antibiotic, which is all the mainstream press understands.
The officials behind this effort to deregulate mercury should go swallow
a few glasses, or inhale for a few weeks. Then tell us how harmless
mercury is.