Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

erpowers

(9,350 posts)
Wed Dec 23, 2015, 02:26 PM Dec 2015

Joe Jamail, ‘King of Torts’ Who Won Record Verdicts, Dies at 90

Source: Bloomberg Business

Joe Jamail, the Texas billionaire who became the richest practicing attorney in the U.S. after winning jury verdicts in civil lawsuits that included a $10.5 billion award for Pennzoil Co. in its landmark case against Texaco Inc. during the 1980s, has died. He was 90.

snip

Dubbed the “King of Torts” for his victories against large corporations, Jamail was lead counsel in more than 200 cases that resulted in verdicts or settlements of at least $1 million for clients in personal-injury matters, according to his website. His representation of Pennzoil in a case against Texaco over the purchase of Getty Oil Co. led to a record jury verdict of $10.5 billion and helped make him one of the U.S.’s most sought-after lawyers during his five decades in practice.

snip

The grocer’s son who was bullied as a child represented clients on three cases that resulted in product recalls for the Remington 600 rifle, Honda’s all-terrain three-wheel vehicles, and the prescription drug Parlodel. His victory in Coates v. Remington Arms Co., in which his client was a man who had been paralyzed from the waist down when his son’s hunting rifle discharged with the safety lock on, resulted in a cash settlement of $6.8 million in 1978, the largest in tort law history at that time.

snip

A whiskey connoisseur who preferred barrooms to country clubs, Jamail was on the winning side in the $560 million negligence and fraud case U.S. National Bank of Galveston et al v. Coopers & Lybrand et al in 1992. He was also successful for the Hugh Roy Cullen family, one of the richest in the U.S., in its 1983 probate fight against two estranged grandsons.

Read more: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2015-12-23/joe-jamail-king-of-torts-who-won-record-verdicts-dies-at-90

10 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Joe Jamail, ‘King of Torts’ Who Won Record Verdicts, Dies at 90 (Original Post) erpowers Dec 2015 OP
Jamail was a great litigator Gothmog Dec 2015 #1
This deposition is his greatest legacy: geek tragedy Dec 2015 #2
That's hysterical! eggplant Dec 2015 #3
Now THAT looks like fun! Whoopee! Unbelievable. JDPriestly Dec 2015 #4
Jesus, can you imagine if they had open carry at that time packman Dec 2015 #5
Right! What is the point of the law if you use your fists to resolve disputes anyway? JDPriestly Dec 2015 #9
This is a court reporter's nightmare. Manifestor_of_Light Dec 2015 #6
Oh damn. JackRiddler Dec 2015 #7
One less rich, greedy lawyer. FLPanhandle Dec 2015 #8
I imagine his clients appreciated him TexasBushwhacker Dec 2015 #10
 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
2. This deposition is his greatest legacy:
Wed Dec 23, 2015, 02:39 PM
Dec 2015

(He's the one taking the deposition--that's his hand in the frame)

 

Manifestor_of_Light

(21,046 posts)
6. This is a court reporter's nightmare.
Wed Dec 23, 2015, 07:37 PM
Dec 2015

Everybody talking at once, over each other, not complying when the court reporter tells them to talk one at a time, stop arguing, stop mumbling, spell their names, or whatever.

This is why I'm nuts. I was a court reporter in Houston for twenty years. And Joe Jamail was a good lawyer but I fortunately never had to take one of these out-of-control depositions with him in it.

His son Dahr Jamail is a good lawyer too.

I never got a steady job as an official reporter in a district or county court because I didn't know the right people, or didn't grovel properly, or something. The term I came up with was "It's who you know or who you blow."

TexasBushwhacker

(20,204 posts)
10. I imagine his clients appreciated him
Wed Dec 23, 2015, 11:55 PM
Dec 2015

The kind of cases he took were incredibly expensive to litigate, and if his clients didn't win, he got nothing. Besides, it's the jury who decides on how much is paid to the damaged party.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Joe Jamail, ‘King of Tort...