Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

neverforget

(9,437 posts)
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 09:14 PM Jan 2016

Militia takes over Malheur National Wildlife Refuge headquarters (Updated)

Last edited Sat Jan 2, 2016, 11:19 PM - Edit history (2)

Source: The Oregonian

BURNS — An unknown number of militia have broken into and are occupying the headquarters building of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge south of here.

A government official speaking on background Saturday said initial reports had the militia entering a building that was closed for the holiday. He said they apparently brought support trailers with them.

Law enforcement officials couldn't be immediately reached for comment.

Brandon Curtiss, an Idaho militia leader who helped organize a protest parade Saturday, told The Oregonian/OregonLive he knew nothing of the occupation. He said he has been told that Ammon Bundy, the son of Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy, is one of the occupiers.

Read more: http://www.oregonlive.com/pacific-northwest-news/index.ssf/2016/01/drama_in_burns_ends_with_quiet.html#incart_big-photo



Well, here we go again

the Bundy nuts have joined now too.

Updated at 6:15 p.m.

The Bundy family of Nevada joined with hard-core militiamen Saturday to take over the headquarters of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge, vowing to occupy the remote federal outpost 50 miles southeast of Burns for years.

The occupation came shortly after an estimated 300 marchers – militia and local citizens both – paraded through Burns to protest the prosecution of two Harney County ranchers, Dwight Hammond Jr. and Steven Hammond, who are to report to prison on Monday.

Among the occupiers is Ammon Bundy, son of Nevada rancher Cliven Bundy, and two of his brothers. Militia members at the refuge claimed they had as many as 150 supporters with them. The refuge was closed and unoccupied for the holiday weekend.

In phone interviews from inside the occupied building Saturday night, Ammon Bundy and his brother, Ryan Bundy, said they are not looking to hurt anyone. But they would not rule out violence if law enforcement tries to remove them, they said, though they declined to elaborate.
240 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Militia takes over Malheur National Wildlife Refuge headquarters (Updated) (Original Post) neverforget Jan 2016 OP
Wow! Are they Muslims? tecelote Jan 2016 #1
idaho, come get your fuckers. thanks, roguevalley roguevalley Jan 2016 #15
I hope the gov takes it back becuase it they don't these anti gov teapartiers will start pulling trillion Jan 2016 #57
Which government? atreides1 Jan 2016 #111
big mistake heaven05 Jan 2016 #129
+10000 trillion Jan 2016 #176
they have no claim to that land, it was public land turned into a refuge by Teddy Roosevelt in 1908 CreekDog Jan 2016 #182
Amen! MatthewStLouis Jan 2016 #228
+1! Enthusiast Jan 2016 #32
Yee-hawdist's (n/t) harun Jan 2016 #222
this part made me laugh..... dhill926 Jan 2016 #2
Small Change november3rd Jan 2016 #19
That's what they're doing! Voice for Peace Jan 2016 #54
The Tea party is a huge movement that is well financed. All are yelling take back America - a trillion Jan 2016 #58
I'm always more concerned about people/groups like this than "them" over there! n/t RKP5637 Jan 2016 #124
Like a laser you honed in on what's going on duhneece Jan 2016 #204
Our county commission, state rep AND US Congressman support this duhneece Jan 2016 #221
That's what they're doing. If you listen to them it's ugly though. trillion Jan 2016 #60
I'm sure they're just picnickers. lob1 Jan 2016 #3
If they want out of the US so bad, let them out. Let them stop paying taxes and no federal benefits. LiberalArkie Jan 2016 #4
This is what happens when the BLM backs down montanacowboy Jan 2016 #5
Bureau of Land Management for those who are wondering. Scuba Jan 2016 #9
Lol thank you Voice for Peace Jan 2016 #55
Thank you. All I could come up with was Black Live Matter. And they do. trillion Jan 2016 #61
hehehe. PersonNumber503602 Jan 2016 #216
Well said. n/t Peregrine Took Jan 2016 #154
So will they be allowed to do this or will there be arrests by the Federal Government? jalan48 Jan 2016 #6
last time I saw the BLM Feds arrest anyone it was an 80 year old woman taking pictures & Sunlei Jan 2016 #114
Latest is that there are just 12-15 in there. ehrnst Jan 2016 #149
LOL-hey Adele isn't that bad. I'd say rap would be most effective against these types. jalan48 Jan 2016 #150
No - the call to prayer drmeow Jan 2016 #162
The soundtrack to Hamilton. ehrnst Jan 2016 #240
"Feliz Navidad." works every time. nt msanthrope Jan 2016 #207
The Barney "I Love You" song was Number one at Gitmo marions ghost Jan 2016 #235
Malheur, of course, means misfortune. forest444 Jan 2016 #7
Not buying that line of mule crap. Lochloosa Jan 2016 #8
Why not, pray tell. forest444 Jan 2016 #11
Because it will just make them look bad. The only people who will get mad are the people already trillion Jan 2016 #62
while i think you are right that they want that, mopinko Jan 2016 #17
Sounds like a plan. forest444 Jan 2016 #36
Good time to rjsquirrel Jan 2016 #112
During the U.S. Civil War, the Union seized the plantation formerly KingCharlemagne Jan 2016 #127
oh man! I didn't know that. Yes, that is a precedent. trillion Jan 2016 #177
I agree. The FAR RIGHT would love to have new martyrs for their White Supremacist cause. Enthusiast Jan 2016 #34
Martyrdom goes only so far pwhtckll Jan 2016 #40
My point exactly. forest444 Jan 2016 #41
This is only happening because Bundy got a away with it last time. It needs to be stopped trillion Jan 2016 #63
Respectfully disagree. Send in the 82nd Airborne and wipe those KingCharlemagne Jan 2016 #128
That might cause the anti-government white supremacists to hate black people and liberals! Enthusiast Jan 2016 #143
Now that I have had some time to think about it, I think a protracted siege KingCharlemagne Jan 2016 #144
It would make for entertaining TV. Maybe Trump would show his support by joining them. Enthusiast Jan 2016 #151
The day that Munificence Jan 2016 #174
I have now changed my mind and favor a protracted KingCharlemagne Jan 2016 #175
You should have taken an oath to protect us from enemies foreign AND DOMESTIC. trillion Jan 2016 #179
Yep Munificence Jan 2016 #236
Send in the drones. trillion Jan 2016 #178
and what if one of these assholes shoots a fed agent? orleans Jan 2016 #81
Not one. Many - he said he trained their group to be snipers to take out federal agents. trillion Jan 2016 #209
If these people were AA tazkcmo Jan 2016 #131
Letting bullies/terrorists have their way is never a good idea Doctor_J Jan 2016 #134
Ouch! That is Federal Boys. Wellstone ruled Jan 2016 #10
It's 10 degrees in Burns right now (closest town). Cut off the heat. Shrike47 Jan 2016 #12
Good idea. They should shut off the water too. DisgustipatedinCA Jan 2016 #14
They most likely came prepared for that to happen passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #21
Hopefully the feds were waiting for this. I like your post. trillion Jan 2016 #64
Excellent post! Enthusiast Jan 2016 #35
and cut off the supporters who are bringing them chili!! lol. orleans Jan 2016 #82
Shutting off the electricity there, does shut off the water. -none Jan 2016 #227
my aunt bell lived in burns. very rural roguevalley Jan 2016 #16
There ya go. Duppers Jan 2016 #18
At that remote location, they will have on-site utilities. Griefbird Jan 2016 #126
Forfeiture laws are based on the property being obtained with tainted (illegally gained) money. NutmegYankee Jan 2016 #135
Gun loons gone wild. nt onehandle Jan 2016 #13
And IMO they are feeling more emboldened all of the time. If given free rein in this RKP5637 Jan 2016 #125
Cowards sight in on Fed officials from their hiding spots keithbvadu2 Jan 2016 #20
but they 'attack' and take over a National Wildlife Refuge building. passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #22
Excuse me? They are taking over that whole national forest - with the building. trillion Jan 2016 #68
They took over the HQ for the refuge, but they're talking about the forest XemaSab Jan 2016 #105
Excuse me? Oh my the histrioncs passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #165
they want the building as symbolic to stop the national forest from being protected land so they trillion Jan 2016 #180
My point stands passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #181
They are in Rebellion against the United States Wolf Frankula Jan 2016 #23
+Infinity! - nt KingCharlemagne Jan 2016 #133
DU finally finds Angel Martin Jan 2016 #157
yeah, a bunch of gunnuts trained as snipers to take out federal agents that have taken over a trillion Jan 2016 #210
The well should be easy enough to shut off. MissB Jan 2016 #24
Just cut off the power. GoCubsGo Jan 2016 #29
Unless they brought portable generators. hack89 Jan 2016 #140
And what fuel source? rjsquirrel Jan 2016 #159
Gasoline carried in 55 gal drums or plastic fuel containers hack89 Jan 2016 #160
To melt snow rjsquirrel Jan 2016 #161
If the government plans to shoot on sight, that would be correct hack89 Jan 2016 #163
What makes you suspect that? rjsquirrel Jan 2016 #164
Time will tell, won't it? hack89 Jan 2016 #168
Yeah the only question is how much time rjsquirrel Jan 2016 #170
it's out in the desert, it's cold but there is not the amount of snow you suggest CreekDog Jan 2016 #185
And I love it when people are insufferable jerks hack89 Jan 2016 #191
I think it was pretty jerky to accuse me of being another poster CreekDog Jan 2016 #192
You really hold grudges over petty shit hack89 Jan 2016 #193
No, there is no grudge against you. The issue is that since so many of your posts are as accurate CreekDog Jan 2016 #195
Yet you are incapable of simply ignoring me hack89 Jan 2016 #196
It's not being a jerk to correct you CreekDog Jan 2016 #197
You can correct people in a civil tone, you know hack89 Jan 2016 #199
Quicker, if there's a chimney-- okasha Jan 2016 #219
How will they cash their disability, Farm Relief, welfare, and unemployment checks from there? NBachers Jan 2016 #25
But but, they want to drown the government in a bathtub. Enthusiast Jan 2016 #37
Direct deposit. nt 2naSalit Jan 2016 #75
(thanks for making me laugh) n/t orleans Jan 2016 #83
+1 harun Jan 2016 #223
The community organized a meeting yesterday with the militia passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #26
And, it's planned if you look close. It's where they're intentionally going. trillion Jan 2016 #69
Even the father and son who are voluntarily reporting --- lastone Jan 2016 #27
Get warrants, and get all their records Babel_17 Jan 2016 #28
Shut off the power . . . OldRedneck Jan 2016 #30
Shutting off the power won't do any good passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #33
They came with 2naSalit Jan 2016 #77
Look at it on google maps passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #166
Shocking I tell you, Shocking!! Kilgore Jan 2016 #93
There is a noon rally set for tomorrow passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #31
Set up a siege and order them to leave immediately. NutmegYankee Jan 2016 #38
Charge them rent - we own the public land in this country. jwirr Jan 2016 #39
Tired of the pearl clutchers soiling their undies Jake Stern Jan 2016 #42
Post removed Post removed Jan 2016 #79
offended? orleans Jan 2016 #84
Did I miss something? Did Occupy demand that the Feds hand over Wall Street? Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jan 2016 #95
+1 daleanime Jan 2016 #104
I hope it's as easily resolved as many of you suggested. rusty quoin Jan 2016 #43
tear gas mucifer Jan 2016 #49
EMP? MisterP Jan 2016 #201
Here is the imposing structure they have taken over. kwassa Jan 2016 #44
That looks like it'd be pretty crowded, and probably smelly by now Electric Monk Jan 2016 #47
they want more militia to show up & that video said they are planning to live there for a couple orleans Jan 2016 #85
bring in the fire fighting helicopters SoLeftIAmRight Jan 2016 #45
I think that's the best idea yet! kentauros Jan 2016 #48
Its ten degrees there now, that is a GREAT idea! peacebird Jan 2016 #106
Love this idea! sybylla Jan 2016 #117
That is perhaps the best idea yet! Maeve Jan 2016 #122
Great idea. Watch them chip ice in 10 degree weather. Doubt they brought "Ice Melt." MatthewStLouis Jan 2016 #229
Send in the national guard, with tanks. geek tragedy Jan 2016 #46
Nah, just wait for the mailman SansACause Jan 2016 #50
If rethugs were in charge, they would've been Duppers Jan 2016 #51
So white domestic terrorists are called underthematrix Jan 2016 #52
yes. But they also go by "right wing" militias. trillion Jan 2016 #72
Turn off the utilities, keep the tv cameras away and let them entertain themselves. Thinkingabout Jan 2016 #53
I am for providing entertainment Gore1FL Jan 2016 #56
If federal trespass law Angel Martin Jan 2016 #59
They don't want the building. They want to turn forest around it into free farmland and mines. Electric Monk Jan 2016 #65
arrest the bastards. Enough is enough of this bullshit still_one Jan 2016 #67
That would probably cause some of them to start shooting... Kablooie Jan 2016 #74
so we have a carpetbagger from Idaho inciting sedition: still_one Jan 2016 #76
i agree orleans Jan 2016 #87
+10000 trillion Jan 2016 #71
They have occupied a federal building. Whether they have 150 people or 3 people, it is a federal still_one Jan 2016 #66
+10000 trillion Jan 2016 #70
Why bother with a trial? SwankyXomb Jan 2016 #147
Wonder if Trump will come out and support these anti-gov terrorists? trillion Jan 2016 #73
WWDD? (what would Donald do) BigBearJohn Jan 2016 #78
Should be interesting! "Donald, do you support the right of insurrections?" n/t RKP5637 Jan 2016 #132
His answer would tell us who is really beind him. trillion Jan 2016 #188
The LAW: BigBearJohn Jan 2016 #80
done and done. hopefully. n/t orleans Jan 2016 #88
Send in the UN black helicopters ucrdem Jan 2016 #86
Is this a sign of things to come? romanic Jan 2016 #89
More like things from the past safeinOhio Jan 2016 #90
150 armed militia members occupy a Fed. building threatening violence DesertRat Jan 2016 #91
Years Turbineguy Jan 2016 #92
Build a wall. Let them go Kilkenny Cat on each other. nt Erich Bloodaxe BSN Jan 2016 #94
With *illegal* Mexican labor and "Obama Internment Camp" signs. SMC22307 Jan 2016 #203
Proud American Patriots left-of-center2012 Jan 2016 #96
I'd be surprised if any of them made it to high school, let alone graduated or got accepted into the trillion Jan 2016 #212
Since it is one building, chain the doors shut from the outside egold2604 Jan 2016 #97
Excellent!! rjsquirrel Jan 2016 #99
+1000. nt. polly7 Jan 2016 #142
If there are snipers drmeow Jan 2016 #158
move a tactical bulldozer up against each door to make sure the door doesn't open egold2604 Jan 2016 #237
I support the use of drones rjsquirrel Jan 2016 #98
Get Out Of Americans National Wildlife Refuge Sunlei Jan 2016 #100
They're not a militia and the media should stop calling them as such sakabatou Jan 2016 #101
Well, if their skin color were different, I'm sure they would be called something different justiceischeap Jan 2016 #120
i think they are hoping to keep the building. mopinko Jan 2016 #141
#OregonUnderAttack #Terrorists #p2 riversedge Jan 2016 #102
So we outent JackInGreen Jan 2016 #103
Surround them and The Wizard Jan 2016 #107
That's exactly what they should do. Vinca Jan 2016 #108
Yes, this has less importance than student take-overs of campus admin bldgs during Vietnam HereSince1628 Jan 2016 #115
yes Locrian Jan 2016 #123
My first impulse upthread was to deploy the 82nd Airborne. On more KingCharlemagne Jan 2016 #136
society wins via deescalation Red Mountain Jan 2016 #167
In general, I suspect the approach will be minimum deemed necessary HereSince1628 Jan 2016 #171
Sheldon Adelson pretty much runs Nevada ehrnst Jan 2016 #109
Keep them up all night with loudspeakers playing geek tragedy Jan 2016 #110
can the government stop their direct deposits? greymattermom Jan 2016 #113
Why not let them have their seige? sybylla Jan 2016 #116
You have the correct answer. But also need to isolate from any assistance,plus warning of ....... dmosh42 Jan 2016 #137
Great opportunity for our home land security forces randr Jan 2016 #118
You are fucking crazy for Munificence Jan 2016 #173
Bullshit. BillZBubb Jan 2016 #186
So what you Munificence Jan 2016 #194
The poster you attacked NEVER suggested what you claim. Again BULLSHIT! BillZBubb Jan 2016 #200
Thanks for the clarity on that BillZBubb randr Jan 2016 #224
ah, just have a drone toss in an incendiary device. The police are equiped for it. trillion Jan 2016 #208
So I am "fucking crazy"? randr Jan 2016 #198
For 15 redneck losers? Oneironaut Jan 2016 #233
Why does the media and government coddle these individuals every time? Earth_First Jan 2016 #119
'Cause Waco and Ruby Ridge. nt justiceischeap Jan 2016 #121
Because that would trigger the ammosexual foil hat brigade ehrnst Jan 2016 #148
Where are all the toys we bought for the drug war? Let's use them. bluedigger Jan 2016 #130
These people aren't a militia. They are armed domestic terrorists. onecaliberal Jan 2016 #138
I'd say their a bunch of piss-ants, where's the terror? HereSince1628 Jan 2016 #145
If Muslims did the same thing or African Americans they would be called onecaliberal Jan 2016 #153
I was thinking that the first time I saw this article. Yep, the'd have already had incindery devices trillion Jan 2016 #187
Definitely. Without question. onecaliberal Jan 2016 #189
Now you know why NRA wants guns for every right wing nut job. Yet we'll treat them like heroes... whereisjustice Jan 2016 #139
Armed criminals... Deuce Jan 2016 #146
If they want to her martyrs, fine. The Green Manalishi Jan 2016 #152
Take out their supply trailers, blow up their vehicles, cut them off Champion Jack Jan 2016 #155
these assholes are terorists plain and simple and should be treated as such TimeToEvolve Jan 2016 #156
This is the key statement passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #169
you're right about the anti gov yahoos but the let's get the point trillion Jan 2016 #183
You might be right, but passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #184
The koches tea party movement is all about appealing to those people. trillion Jan 2016 #214
Sorry, I just don't buy it passiveporcupine Jan 2016 #230
How important is the building? Bradical79 Jan 2016 #172
Why do Feds treat this like some impossibly delicate situation? Teamster Jeff Jan 2016 #190
They are soooooooooooooooooo butch ! olddots Jan 2016 #202
. trillion Jan 2016 #213
Update from the Harney County sheriff: Qutzupalotl Jan 2016 #205
Good post. Thanks! trillion Jan 2016 #211
So, Bundy and his gang of idiots are occupying the Malheur Refuge? classof56 Jan 2016 #206
The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) defines terrorism as: Elmer S. E. Dump Jan 2016 #215
What exactly is the backstory on this? PersonNumber503602 Jan 2016 #217
Okay.. For those who still don't know, here's some information. PersonNumber503602 Jan 2016 #218
Unless the witnesses lied, they deserve some time Strelnikov_ Jan 2016 #231
These right wing un-American thugs long to be a ISIS wannabes rockfordfile Jan 2016 #220
Where's Janet Reno when you need her? Tarc Jan 2016 #225
I'd think towing their vehicles would be the first step hollowdweller Jan 2016 #226
Way overblown. Why is the media hyping this? Oneironaut Jan 2016 #232
If they were black.... workinclasszero Jan 2016 #234
Launch the drones. briv1016 Jan 2016 #238
Well, Ted Cruz tells them to "Stand Down"... AnotherDreamWeaver Jan 2016 #239

tecelote

(5,122 posts)
1. Wow! Are they Muslims?
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 09:21 PM
Jan 2016

Or, maybe they're Mexican immigrants?

Or... Terrorists. That's it. Sure glad we're fighting them over there so we don't have to fight them here.

Wait. What? White guys?

Again?

 

trillion

(1,859 posts)
57. I hope the gov takes it back becuase it they don't these anti gov teapartiers will start pulling
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 03:19 AM
Jan 2016

this all over.

Bet it's a test in their gear up for that revolution they keep talking about.

"The best possible outcome is that the ranchers that have been kicked out of the area, then they will come back and reclaim their land, and the wildlife refuge will be shut down forever and the federal government will relinquish such control," he said. "What we're doing is not rebellious. What we're doing is in accordance with the Constitution, which is the supreme law of the land."

We went to the local communities and presented it many times and to many different people," he said. "They were not strong enough to make the stand. So many individuals across the United States and in Oregon are making this stand. We hope they will grab onto this and realize that it's been happening."

Among those joining Bundy in the occupation are Ryan Payne, U.S. Army veteran, and Blaine Cooper
Payne has claimed to have helped organize militia snipers to target federal agents in a standoff last year in Nevada. He told one news organization the federal agents would have been killed had they made the wrong move.


"

atreides1

(16,093 posts)
111. Which government?
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 10:12 AM
Jan 2016

You surely aren't talking about the US Government...the same government that allows Cliven Bundy to continue to rip off US tax payers?

Since Waco and Ruby Ridge, the government only has the courage to go up against unarmed protesters...they're too afraid to actually face armed individuals, especially when you consider that some of those individuals are US military veterans, some of whom have seen combat and are not above shooting law enforcement!


The Feds will drag this out, hoping that the militia leaves on their own...but by failing to hold Bundy accountable, retreating, and continuing to do nothing...the Feds don't scare anyone, anymore!!!

 

heaven05

(18,124 posts)
129. big mistake
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 11:22 AM
Jan 2016

to not have stomped bundy's ass into the ground in the original "take back amerika" incident.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
182. they have no claim to that land, it was public land turned into a refuge by Teddy Roosevelt in 1908
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 04:38 PM
Jan 2016

dhill926

(16,359 posts)
2. this part made me laugh.....
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 09:26 PM
Jan 2016

what a bunch of buffoons...

"As the marchers reached the courthouse, they tossed hundreds of pennies at the locked door. The idea, militiamen said, was that civilians were "buying back" their government to serve the people. But the message didn't last long. Two young girls swooped in after the march passed on to scavenge the pennies."

 

november3rd

(1,113 posts)
19. Small Change
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 10:38 PM
Jan 2016

It takes more than small change to have a democracy and make it work. If you feel like your government is out of control, organize the grass roots and get involved in self-government.

 

trillion

(1,859 posts)
58. The Tea party is a huge movement that is well financed. All are yelling take back America - a
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 03:26 AM
Jan 2016

planned and paid for chant. These yahoo's want a revolution. This out of the way place is a test.

I wonder how organized this is because ultimately where do you think the Koch brother are going with all the very organized hate speech these people are spewing lately? All roads lead to their revolution. I hope the gov is investigating them because they are the biggest threat to the US government and us.

duhneece

(4,118 posts)
204. Like a laser you honed in on what's going on
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:16 PM
Jan 2016

The Koch Bros support ALEC and ALC American Lands Council which repeats the 'Take Back the Land' to counties, receiving tens of thousands of dollars...they want to take, as in steal, public lands and privatize, selling them off to the highest bidders, be they energy industry (oil, natural gas or coal), mining, timber or 'rich guy who wants to play 'cowboy'...
Like a giant pyramid scheme, we have a county commissioner who is a star in this drama and several state representatives who receive contributions from the energy industry and support this 'mission.'
That is why I am intent on filing for candidacy just to raise support of this...and women's reproductive choice and pro-legalize cannabis...I'm mad as hell and I'm not going to take it anymore.

duhneece

(4,118 posts)
221. Our county commission, state rep AND US Congressman support this
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 05:35 AM
Jan 2016

They all want to 'take back the lands' that belong to the public.

LiberalArkie

(15,729 posts)
4. If they want out of the US so bad, let them out. Let them stop paying taxes and no federal benefits.
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 09:32 PM
Jan 2016

No usage of highways, airports, schools, hospitals nothing.

montanacowboy

(6,103 posts)
5. This is what happens when the BLM backs down
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 09:37 PM
Jan 2016

Will they back down again and let the terrorists have their way? What does it take for this government to get control of these whack jobs.

PersonNumber503602

(1,134 posts)
216. hehehe.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 11:59 PM
Jan 2016

I wouldn't have made the correct connection if it wasn't for the events last year (or whenever it was)

jalan48

(13,887 posts)
6. So will they be allowed to do this or will there be arrests by the Federal Government?
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 09:37 PM
Jan 2016

You know, law and order?

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
114. last time I saw the BLM Feds arrest anyone it was an 80 year old woman taking pictures &
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 10:28 AM
Jan 2016

they gave her heatstroke by leaving her in their police car in the desert.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
149. Latest is that there are just 12-15 in there.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 12:51 PM
Jan 2016

Turn off the power, cut off the water, and blare Adele at them 24/7.

forest444

(5,902 posts)
7. Malheur, of course, means misfortune.
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 09:38 PM
Jan 2016

As much as these clowns deserve to have the book thrown at them, it's crucial President Obama handle this incident with kid gloves (just as he did with the Cliven Bundy incident a couple of years ago).

Because what Rethugs want most right now, is another Waco-style misfortune. We all know it wouldn't matter how much these criminals did to provoke it; if even one of those cretins is killed by a Federal Agent, it's goodbye to the White House for Democrats.

 

trillion

(1,859 posts)
62. Because it will just make them look bad. The only people who will get mad are the people already
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 03:46 AM
Jan 2016

supporting them.

mopinko

(70,235 posts)
17. while i think you are right that they want that,
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 10:24 PM
Jan 2016

i think it is foolish to let them get away with it. there are plenty of dems who will be very disappointed if this is allowed to stand.
starve them out. cut the utilities. give them some decoys to waste their ammo on. hell, put some drugs in the water.
somewhere along the line, there is a line they cant cross. this looks like one to me.

forest444

(5,902 posts)
36. Sounds like a plan.
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 11:46 PM
Jan 2016

I'm with you all the way there. These are criminals who deserve to be duped by all the clever schemes the authorities can muster - which besides would be for their own good (the militia participants), since a successful ruse on the part of the Feds would both defuse the situation and bring them to justice with no casualties.

Which is exactly what we want - and the GOP does not.

Let's hope and pray for the best.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
127. During the U.S. Civil War, the Union seized the plantation formerly
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 11:19 AM
Jan 2016

Owned by Robert E. Lee. Lee's former plantation is now the site of the Arlington National Cemetery. So there is precedent.

Enthusiast

(50,983 posts)
34. I agree. The FAR RIGHT would love to have new martyrs for their White Supremacist cause.
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 11:40 PM
Jan 2016

And if Obama was responsible for it? Holy shit! Well, Cliven Bundy would tell us about the negro.

This needs to be handled delicately.

pwhtckll

(72 posts)
40. Martyrdom goes only so far
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 12:10 AM
Jan 2016

I 100% agree that a heavy-handed crackdown on this terrorists would turn them into martyrs and enrage their wackadoodle base...

...however...

By popping the lid off the bottle of crazy that is the unhinged right-wing extremists, the moderates and independents in the public might see the lunatics in all their hatred. An electoral shift to the left could occur (similar to backlash against the same fringe after Oklahoma City).

forest444

(5,902 posts)
41. My point exactly.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 12:17 AM
Jan 2016

We had better not play checkers with this, when the far right has gotten so good at playing chess.

 

trillion

(1,859 posts)
63. This is only happening because Bundy got a away with it last time. It needs to be stopped
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 03:47 AM
Jan 2016

before massive gunnuts join them with just reading about it and no provocation from the gov.

From the article:
"Ryan Bundy said there were no hostages, but the group is demanding that the Hammonds be released and the federal government relinquish control of the Malheur National Forest.

He said many would be willing to fight — and die, if necessary — to defend what they see as constitutionally protected rights for states, counties and individuals to manage local lands. Among those joining Bundy in the occupation are Ryan Payne, U.S. Army veteran, and Blaine Cooper Payne has claimed to have helped organize militia snipers to target federal agents in a standoff last year in Nevada. He told one news organization the federal agents would have been killed had they made the wrong move."

that's exactly where these anti-gov's will go with this.


 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
144. Now that I have had some time to think about it, I think a protracted siege
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 12:29 PM
Jan 2016

is more in order, a la Vicksburg.

Munificence

(493 posts)
174. The day that
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 03:13 PM
Jan 2016

happens is the day I arm up. Our military is not to be used against it's citizens....PERIOD. I am an X-combat soldier and I can see how one would make really stupid comments like you just did...ignorance.






 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
175. I have now changed my mind and favor a protracted
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 04:15 PM
Jan 2016

siege, a la Vicksburg.

What's your position on the U.S. civil War, by the way?

Munificence

(493 posts)
236. Yep
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 04:16 PM
Jan 2016

I sure did.

"I will defend the constitution of the U.S against all enemies, both foreign and domestic..."

orleans

(34,074 posts)
81. and what if one of these assholes shoots a fed agent?
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 05:15 AM
Jan 2016

i thought one of the asshats said they are ready to do that.

 

trillion

(1,859 posts)
209. Not one. Many - he said he trained their group to be snipers to take out federal agents.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 10:07 PM
Jan 2016

Then he said the federal agents would have been killed if they made the wrong move.

tazkcmo

(7,302 posts)
131. If these people were AA
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 11:24 AM
Jan 2016

They'd already be dead. This must be shut down or it will grow. At a minimum, they should be surrounded and denied electricity, water, food and any other resource, identified and incarcerated in our Federal prison system for the rest of their lives.

 

Doctor_J

(36,392 posts)
134. Letting bullies/terrorists have their way is never a good idea
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 11:28 AM
Jan 2016

at some point the president needs to take a stand instead of worrying about what the republicans think

 

DisgustipatedinCA

(12,530 posts)
14. Good idea. They should shut off the water too.
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 10:13 PM
Jan 2016

Let the little fuckers pretend they're in Stalingrad. They'll have fun with that for about a day, then they'll be whimpering to get out.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
21. They most likely came prepared for that to happen
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 10:51 PM
Jan 2016
vowing to occupy the remote federal outpost 50 miles southeast of Burns for years.

Not sure how they plan on lasting there for years. This might be interesting.

Ammon Bundy said the the goal is to turn over federal land to local ranchers, loggers and miners. He said he met with 10 or so residents in Burns on Friday to try to recruit them, but they declined.


It's possible that this is exactly what the feds have been waiting for. Now they have something solid to arrest the Bundy boys on, and the militants who joined them. Wait till they give up and leave, and then go after them at home and arrest them all.

I really really hope this does not turn into another gun battle. This time the feds won't allow themselves to be trapped in a bad situation where they can be easily taken out.
 

trillion

(1,859 posts)
64. Hopefully the feds were waiting for this. I like your post.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 03:57 AM
Jan 2016

If this does turn out to be another Ruby Ridge, they started it.

Griefbird

(96 posts)
126. At that remote location, they will have on-site utilities.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 11:17 AM
Jan 2016

A siege may prevent them from refreshing supplies, but the first attempt at interception would spark either a violent confrontation or the Feds backing down again. Whatever the response, it will be costly to taxpayers. I wonder if Federal forfeiture laws can be used to seize their homes and assets? They can't assemble at all their homes at once.

NutmegYankee

(16,201 posts)
135. Forfeiture laws are based on the property being obtained with tainted (illegally gained) money.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 11:29 AM
Jan 2016

That would likely not be the case here. Unless the protest turns violent, the men in the building are looking at fines and minor jail time at best. Though I'm adamant that the Government not back down again.

RKP5637

(67,112 posts)
125. And IMO they are feeling more emboldened all of the time. If given free rein in this
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 11:08 AM
Jan 2016

situation, IMO this is going to grow and grow. As someone else said, this is their test to see how far they can go. My hope is this can be cleared up without any bloodshed.

keithbvadu2

(36,926 posts)
20. Cowards sight in on Fed officials from their hiding spots
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 10:50 PM
Jan 2016

but they 'attack' and take over a National Wildlife Refuge building.

Let them take over a Fed Marshall's building.

Or FBI.

Their teeny little cojones would fall out of their wives' pocketbook.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
22. but they 'attack' and take over a National Wildlife Refuge building.
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 10:56 PM
Jan 2016

Don't forget they attacked and won a battle with an empty building. No one there for the weekend.

I wish my car was younger and I didn't have so many animals. I'd love to take a trip to Burns to check this out. But then again the weather...ahhh nope!

XemaSab

(60,212 posts)
105. They took over the HQ for the refuge, but they're talking about the forest
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 09:28 AM
Jan 2016

They're totally separate entities. Not even in the same department.

The refuge is Interior, and the forest is Ag.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
165. Excuse me? Oh my the histrioncs
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:30 PM
Jan 2016


My point was...there was nobody there to resist them that weekend. And what exactly is there to take over in the forest, except the administration buildings? The wildlife? A few hikers?
 

trillion

(1,859 posts)
180. they want the building as symbolic to stop the national forest from being protected land so they
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 04:29 PM
Jan 2016

can "farm on it" (and I'd put money that there's a corporation that wants the land. My wild guess is Koch brother's for fracking but I have no idea.)

I was just correcting you with this is about more than just taking the building. They are also demanding criminals freed from federal prison. The money is the Federal land though. Always follow the money. The right has spent a lot of money teaching their minions to be against protected land for the reason that their corporate superpacts want to rape it. The building and the convicts are to throw us off.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
181. My point stands
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 04:34 PM
Jan 2016

There was no one there to "resist" their takeover.

Yes, it's not over, and they plan on hanging out there for awhile, but it's a small group with no power, so it's just going to be a news story for awhile...hopefully! And then hopefully, they all get sent to join those other federal prisoners.

Wolf Frankula

(3,601 posts)
23. They are in Rebellion against the United States
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 11:01 PM
Jan 2016

Send the Army to clear them out. No prisoners shall be taken.

Wolf

 

trillion

(1,859 posts)
210. yeah, a bunch of gunnuts trained as snipers to take out federal agents that have taken over a
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 10:10 PM
Jan 2016

federal building and want to take over a federal forest. As soon as they kill someone can we call them terrorists?

MissB

(15,812 posts)
24. The well should be easy enough to shut off.
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 11:07 PM
Jan 2016

Based on the age of the well that serves the property, it's likely a fair enough distance from the building. Cut it off.

GoCubsGo

(32,094 posts)
29. Just cut off the power.
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 11:33 PM
Jan 2016

Unless the pump is solar-powered, cutting off the electricity should do it.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
140. Unless they brought portable generators.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 12:08 PM
Jan 2016

It wouldn't be too hard to prepare for an extended occupation.

 

rjsquirrel

(4,762 posts)
159. And what fuel source?
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 01:30 PM
Jan 2016

Once they are done burning the trail maps and their candy bar wrappers, it's 10 degrees there. Turn off the heat, turn off the water, douse the interior with water by sticking a firehose through the window or down a chimney or if you can't get close, backflow it into a waste water line from a distance, and wait 6 hours until they start to freeze to death.

They'll come out. The ones that don't will be too delirious to fight. Freezing does funny things to the mind.

Bonus, they'll come out looking like the Abominable Snowman.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
160. Gasoline carried in 55 gal drums or plastic fuel containers
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 01:37 PM
Jan 2016

Kerosene heaters, again with the fuel brought in. Water is easy - you melt snow. This is not rocket science, especially if these guys are preppers. Lots of people know how to survive for extended periods in extreme cold - ask any snow mobiler, ice fisherman or winter camper.

If the guys are armed, just how are you going to get a fire hose anywhere near that building?

 

rjsquirrel

(4,762 posts)
161. To melt snow
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 01:43 PM
Jan 2016

or get gas you have to go outside the building.

Unless you're dumb enough to bring fuel storage inside.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
163. If the government plans to shoot on sight, that would be correct
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 01:46 PM
Jan 2016

I suspect that they have a sizable water supply on hand to start with.

 

rjsquirrel

(4,762 posts)
164. What makes you suspect that?
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:28 PM
Jan 2016

Enough water for 20 guys in an extended siege? You're talking serious amounts of water.

And yes, shoot (or tase, or hose down with freezing water) on sight when they leave the building if they refuse to surrender, I should think.

Either way their supplies cannot be infinite and can't be that large; 20 guys in a large-cabin sized building at 10 degrees might last a week or two at the outside if they brought in all they could fit in the place. They are surrounded by open space full of cops with clear lines of sight. There are non-lethal weapons that could render someone unable to go back in from the moment they presented a clear target, and you can bet the feds have them. All you'd need would be a tranqulizer dart, a rubber bullet, or a strong LRAD or if you can get close enough, a taser. If they provide covering fire, then you escalate to real bullets.

Speed things up and knock out a wall or some windows and soak the place with a high powered hose from a safe distance.

Not sure why you are arguing for these guys' proficiency (on the basis of no facts either way about their supply levels or preparation). I'm an avid hunter and used to winter wilderness conditions in the west. I look at most of these guys and wonder if they've ever walked more than a few miles into the wilderness. Right now they are in a house. It is very simple to render a house uninhabitable at 10 degrees ambient. They can be frozen out. Their fuel source can be suppressed and denied if it's outside, and it has to be limited severely if it's inside. So I don't see the argument here really. Yeah maybe they can hang on a few days or a week. But they can't hang on indefinitely and the feds aren't going to let them. Waco and Ruby Ridge were both on the preppers' own turf and terms. Both situations involved adversaries with dug in supplies of food, fuel, water, and comm gear, not to mention ammo and weapons, intimate knowledge of the terrain involved, and more impervious redoubts.

Frankly I think a high intensity acoustic weapon could do the job quickly with no bloodshed. But add water and wait.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
168. Time will tell, won't it?
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:43 PM
Jan 2016

if you are correct, all we have to do is put up a secure perimeter and wait awhile. Sounds like a reasonable course of action to me.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
185. it's out in the desert, it's cold but there is not the amount of snow you suggest
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 04:43 PM
Jan 2016

i love it when people talk so self assuredly about something they don't know about.

there's really no need to do that.

nobody is forcing you to say things about the region Malheur is located in, but there you are speaking off the cuff (and wrongly) as though you have no choice but to post something incorrect.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
191. And I love it when people are insufferable jerks
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 05:13 PM
Jan 2016

why are you so persistently rude? Just your nature?

hack89

(39,171 posts)
193. You really hold grudges over petty shit
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 05:49 PM
Jan 2016

If an anonymous Internet poster bothers you much than perhaps it is time to evaluate your priorities. Here is hoping for a healthier outlook for you.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
195. No, there is no grudge against you. The issue is that since so many of your posts are as accurate
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 06:00 PM
Jan 2016

as that accusation against me.

I don't have any patience left when you post the wrong information.

That's far different from a grudge.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
196. Yet you are incapable of simply ignoring me
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 06:06 PM
Jan 2016

Why is that? Getting all worked up and being a jerk is going to make things all better? Some how I doubt it. Would it help you if I put you on ignore so you don't have to interact with me? I would be willing to do it for you.

CreekDog

(46,192 posts)
197. It's not being a jerk to correct you
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 06:10 PM
Jan 2016

This constant portrayal of yourself as a victim when you're merely being corrected on your errors is really getting tiresome.

And your suggestion about ignoring you seems to be more about you wanting to be able to make incorrect statements without correction than anything else.

Why don't you take some responsibility for your posts and not say things that are wrong?

You wouldn't want to mislead anyone right?

hack89

(39,171 posts)
199. You can correct people in a civil tone, you know
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 06:13 PM
Jan 2016

I have no real problem being correct - I am not perfect. Serial jerkoffs do bother me.

okasha

(11,573 posts)
219. Quicker, if there's a chimney--
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 01:40 AM
Jan 2016

Drop a few tear gas cannisters down it.

The toy soldiers will come out.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
26. The community organized a meeting yesterday with the militia
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 11:09 PM
Jan 2016

to let them know of their fears about the militia being there. While half a dozen of the militia men wore holstered side-arms (open carry). Nothing like a little intimidation at a meeting for a supposedly peaceful conversation.

Damn, these open carry idiots make me feel sick. Everything happening all over the US seems to be coming to some kind of a head. Some kind of a civil war if enough people get involved.

 

trillion

(1,859 posts)
69. And, it's planned if you look close. It's where they're intentionally going.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 04:09 AM
Jan 2016

The blacks know. The white Democrats just haven't caught on yet.

 

lastone

(588 posts)
27. Even the father and son who are voluntarily reporting ---
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 11:20 PM
Jan 2016

To federal prison to serve the additional time don't want these buffoons anywhere near their town. Gov Brown should lay down the law, arrest every one of them for b and e, trespass, terroristic threatening, etc etc. Fuck these fools - gawd damn am I sick of these idiots.

Babel_17

(5,400 posts)
28. Get warrants, and get all their records
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 11:30 PM
Jan 2016

Insurrection is no joke but these guys are in fantasy land, so we have that going for us. Don't create martyrs, create work for investigators.

This probably starts unraveling when those involved start feeling the effect of the lower credit scores their life choices are going to bring.

I don't think it's helpful to coddle these blatant law breakers. People's trust in the fairness of our system is already tattered. I'd say it's safe to say nearly all the referees are going to agree that the administration has showed patience and restraint with these clowns. Time to serve warrants and roll them up. It's not like we don't have decades of experience in doing this.

 

OldRedneck

(1,397 posts)
30. Shut off the power . . .
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 11:34 PM
Jan 2016

Shut off the power. Remove all government employees. Don't plow the roads. Block every road. No one gets in or out. It's winter. Starve the ignorant sonsabitches.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
33. Shutting off the power won't do any good
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 11:38 PM
Jan 2016

There is a tiny town right next to the headquarters called Voltage. That must be where they are getting their power!

that's a joke, just in case someone was wondering.

2naSalit

(86,799 posts)
77. They came with
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 04:38 AM
Jan 2016

supply trailers and I am willing to bet they have generators and food and water just in case. Not sure how many buildings are there but I would imagine there are no residences since there are no hostages.

I'm so sick of these shitheads.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
166. Look at it on google maps
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:35 PM
Jan 2016

there are quite a few buildings there. They can house a number of militants. But the buildings are separated, not just one big building, so it might be easier to infiltrate, harder to defend. Still it's a big complex and not knowing the water and power situation, years of occupation still sounds a bit far fetched to me.

How will they renew supplies, like food? Helicopter drops? Or will they just live off of meat that they hunt? A man child's dream...living in the woods with a rifle for survival.

NutmegYankee

(16,201 posts)
38. Set up a siege and order them to leave immediately.
Sat Jan 2, 2016, 11:56 PM
Jan 2016

If they don't, bring in heavy vehicles to drag them out. If they fire a shot, pull back and bring in 155mm Howitzers and just pound the shit out of the place.

Jake Stern

(3,145 posts)
42. Tired of the pearl clutchers soiling their undies
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 12:18 AM
Jan 2016

at the thought of the government asserting law and order by force.

Warnings came aplenty that the Fed's gutless reaction to the Bundy incident would embolden these militia types. That has been proven true time and again.

When are we going to finally draw a line in the sand with these seditious bastards?

Response to Jake Stern (Reply #42)

Erich Bloodaxe BSN

(14,733 posts)
95. Did I miss something? Did Occupy demand that the Feds hand over Wall Street?
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 08:43 AM
Jan 2016

The Federal Reserve? Federal property?

Occupy was a peaceful, unarmed demonstration that threatened no violence to anyone, that was covered by that good old First Amendment, quaint as it might be, and the right to free assembly.

These guys have repeatedly threatened violence against Federal employees and committed an act of armed insurrection, while denying the authority of the Federal government. They weren't all arrested for treason or sedition last time, so they upped the ante.

There's a HUGE difference between the two groups, and to compare how people respond to the two is ludicrous.

 

rusty quoin

(6,133 posts)
43. I hope it's as easily resolved as many of you suggested.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 12:23 AM
Jan 2016

But it is not that hard to live without electricity, especially if you are use to the cold and are well prepared. They say they brought generators.

If they are well supplied, as they say with and gasoline, and it the future more food, they could easily last until spring.

I hope it's just another right wing failure in which not many show up, but they can shit and piss all over the place, shoot animals, burn up the place, and face down law enforcement with their arms. They can do a lot of damage.

I think it's a delicate situation, and I hope I'm wrong.

orleans

(34,074 posts)
85. they want more militia to show up & that video said they are planning to live there for a couple
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 05:25 AM
Jan 2016

years.

HA!

kentauros

(29,414 posts)
48. I think that's the best idea yet!
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 01:38 AM
Jan 2016

Reminds me of the airtanker scenes in the movie "Always" like this one:





peacebird

(14,195 posts)
106. Its ten degrees there now, that is a GREAT idea!
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 09:28 AM
Jan 2016

Their generator is outside.they will have to keep it fueled, and seeing them ice skating to it could be amusing for the feds surrounding the building!

Maeve

(42,288 posts)
122. That is perhaps the best idea yet!
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 10:54 AM
Jan 2016

Tear gas is more dangerous, massive firearm response is what they want....sideways thinking is called for here and that's a beauty of an idea.

 

geek tragedy

(68,868 posts)
46. Send in the national guard, with tanks.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 12:38 AM
Jan 2016

This escalation on their part will continue until they learn some hard lessons.

Duppers

(28,127 posts)
51. If rethugs were in charge, they would've been
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:10 AM
Jan 2016

dispensed with immediately.

What if these people had dark skin? The RW would be calling for their heads. Always the sos. Sigh.

Gore1FL

(21,152 posts)
56. I am for providing entertainment
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 03:13 AM
Jan 2016

24/hrs a day of recorded elementary school concerts played at significant volume.

Angel Martin

(942 posts)
59. If federal trespass law
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 03:32 AM
Jan 2016

is enforced like federal immigration law, these kooks will all be pardoned and get to keep the building...

 

Electric Monk

(13,869 posts)
65. They don't want the building. They want to turn forest around it into free farmland and mines.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 03:58 AM
Jan 2016

Remember the Cliven Bundy thing in Nevada? This is part two, from the same crew. Three of them are his kids. I think their number of 150 might be slightly exaggerated, as well.



http://www.nydailynews.com/news/national/militia-takes-ore-fed-building-protest-article-1.2483723

Kablooie

(18,641 posts)
74. That would probably cause some of them to start shooting...
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 04:18 AM
Jan 2016

Which could be the trigger for all the other insane survivalist creeps in the country to start 'defending' themselves (which means attacking government law enforcement)

And then we've got our own homegrown jihad right here to deal with.

still_one

(92,419 posts)
76. so we have a carpetbagger from Idaho inciting sedition:
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 04:30 AM
Jan 2016

"In a phone interview with the Oregonian, Ammond Bundy said that “would not rule out violence if law enforcement tries to remove them.” He called the headquarters building “the tool to do all the tyranny that has been placed upon the Hammonds” and said he was “planning on staying…for years.” In a message on Facebook Bundy said he planned on establishing the facility as a base for militia members across the country: "

The government cannot let this stand


orleans

(34,074 posts)
87. i agree
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 05:41 AM
Jan 2016

but if it turns out the government is okay with all this crap then i would like the government to give me a nice little cabin type house to live in with my own national forest for my backyard.

still_one

(92,419 posts)
66. They have occupied a federal building. Whether they have 150 people or 3 people, it is a federal
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 04:01 AM
Jan 2016

crime they have committed, and they need to be arrested, and tried in a federal court.

As far as I am concerned this is an act of domestic terrorism. If they don't surrender, then appropriate force must applied to arrest them.

SwankyXomb

(2,030 posts)
147. Why bother with a trial?
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 12:45 PM
Jan 2016

Ship them straight to Gitmo. I'm sure that would spur the RW obstructionists into demanding its immediate closure.

 

trillion

(1,859 posts)
73. Wonder if Trump will come out and support these anti-gov terrorists?
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 04:14 AM
Jan 2016

I bet yes, because Trump has not said anything new. All he has parroted is Tea Party values.

BigBearJohn

(11,410 posts)
78. WWDD? (what would Donald do)
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 04:50 AM
Jan 2016

Can't wait to hear Donald's take on this.
Watch Donald turn this into a circus.
He'll be sure to recommend peace & understanding.

Gee, just in time for the primaries. Coincidence I'm sure.

 

trillion

(1,859 posts)
188. His answer would tell us who is really beind him.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 04:48 PM
Jan 2016

If he says yes and de-regulate federal forest lands, he's back by corporations like coal and fracking.

BigBearJohn

(11,410 posts)
80. The LAW:
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 05:10 AM
Jan 2016


If two or more persons in any State or Territory, or in any place subject to the jurisdiction of the United States, conspire to overthrow, put down, or to destroy by force the Government of the United States, or to levy war against them, or to oppose by force the authority thereof, or by force to prevent, hinder, or delay the execution of any law of the United States, or by force to seize, take, or possess any property of the United States contrary to the authority thereof, they shall each be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both.
(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; July 24, 1956, ch. 678, § 1, 70 Stat. 623; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2384

safeinOhio

(32,727 posts)
90. More like things from the past
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 08:11 AM
Jan 2016

Shay's Rebellion.
Shay's men attacked the Federal property in Springfield. Two rounds of grape shot were fired at the Rebel Militia, killing 4 and injuring 20. They retreated in a hurry.

Sam Adams said at the time "rebellion in a republic, unlike in a monarchy, should be punished by execution."

Then there was Jefferson speaking from Europe about watering the tree of freedom....

Anyway Shay's Militia lost it's attack on the "unfair" Federal Government.

SMC22307

(8,090 posts)
203. With *illegal* Mexican labor and "Obama Internment Camp" signs.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:06 PM
Jan 2016

I'll sit back and enjoy The Pogues while the Yeehawdists take each other out.



left-of-center2012

(34,195 posts)
96. Proud American Patriots
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 08:45 AM
Jan 2016

I wonder how many of these 'brave men' actually served in the US military to protect the Constitution?
I suspect some 'claim' they did.

Guess it's easier to take over federal property than fight in Afghanistan.

 

trillion

(1,859 posts)
212. I'd be surprised if any of them made it to high school, let alone graduated or got accepted into the
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 10:16 PM
Jan 2016

miltary.

egold2604

(369 posts)
97. Since it is one building, chain the doors shut from the outside
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 08:51 AM
Jan 2016

Chain the doors shut from the outside, cut off all water and electricity, block all cell phone transmissions. Starve them out.

Put them on terrorist watch lists, make it illegal for them to own arms since they attacked a Federal building. Put them on a no fly list.

Call out the National Guard to surround the complex several hundred yards out of range of sniper shots.

They will eventually run out of fuel for their generators. Wait then out.

When they surrender, send them to Gitmo.

What they are doing is treason plain and simple,

And freeze all their bank accounts and stop all their government checks. Freeze any GoFundme accounts set up by their supporters.

Not a shot has to be fired. Let them shoot first and do not respond in kind.

egold2604

(369 posts)
237. move a tactical bulldozer up against each door to make sure the door doesn't open
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 06:34 PM
Jan 2016

a better way to close the doors is to run a tactical bulldozer up against each door to prevent it from opening. then use non-lethal bean bag guns to break the windows so the building will freeze

justiceischeap

(14,040 posts)
120. Well, if their skin color were different, I'm sure they would be called something different
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 10:47 AM
Jan 2016

but because they're white guys, they're militia.

riversedge

(70,306 posts)
102. #OregonUnderAttack #Terrorists #p2
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 09:21 AM
Jan 2016

This can not be allowed to continue.


McSpocky ?@mcspocky 23m23 minutes ago

A Militia Has Taken Over A Federal Building In Oregon http://huff.to/1YYnyku
#OregonUnderAttack #Terrorists #p2

The Wizard

(12,549 posts)
107. Surround them and
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 09:31 AM
Jan 2016

cut off all utilities and access to food. Then wait them out. When they get tired they'll surrender without much of a fight. They are delusional, and armed so it's a tricky situation.

Vinca

(50,310 posts)
108. That's exactly what they should do.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 09:43 AM
Jan 2016

If the feds acted in my preferred way - mega force and a big roundup - these characters would become martyrs. I'm so sick of these faux patriots. This time they've got to be arrested rather than coddled like last time.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
115. Yes, this has less importance than student take-overs of campus admin bldgs during Vietnam
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 10:29 AM
Jan 2016

There's no need to go Waco on them.

1) There is little threat to lives or property at this point. An assault by federal marshalls and deputized assistance would change that.

2) The sit-in is contained. The situation isn't growing, the sit-in can be shrunk from here without violence. The sit-in per se gains the participants nothing.

The HQ of the wildlife center is a soft target that provides control of almost nothing beyond it's lighting, HVAC, and water. Having control of that building poses not much threat to the community and none to the nation. The sit-in doesn't even gain control of the wildlife refuge by taking over control of these HQ facilities.

Temporary media celebrity is the best they can hope for. They should be denied opportunities for the latter.

3) Once isolated, the tables are turned and the sit-in itself is under siege. Without re-supply the sit-in can't have any hope of controlling the outcome which is inevitable surrender. Preventing re-supply, and encouraging defections/surrender is really all that's needed. Until then they are effectively under 'house arrest'.

4) Having the participants look like children throwing an unreasonable tantrum is a desirable objective. Making the sit-in appear as martyrs and the flash-point for an insurrection suitable for an Ian Slater novel is not.

Locrian

(4,522 posts)
123. yes
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 10:56 AM
Jan 2016

maybe they start to realize that they actually need civilization (food, water, heat, etc) and not just a ton of guns to survive.

 

KingCharlemagne

(7,908 posts)
136. My first impulse upthread was to deploy the 82nd Airborne. On more
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 11:40 AM
Jan 2016

mature reflection, I prefer your approach and thinking. (Essentially a variant of Scott's Anaconda Strategy in microcosm.)

Red Mountain

(1,737 posts)
167. society wins via deescalation
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:38 PM
Jan 2016

but what is the end game? Do they face any sort of sanction for their activities or are they allowed to walk away and do it again?

That's the troubling part, IMHO. Last time, they walked.

Here they are again.


Arresting these people individually also risks violence.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
171. In general, I suspect the approach will be minimum deemed necessary
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:55 PM
Jan 2016

but that depends on how the gang in the wildlife headquarters behaves.

I think it will mostly be about trespass, failure to comply with lawful orders and interference with government personnel trying to perform their duties, etc.

But it also seems to be the case that once wasn't enough for Bundy, and often the follow on events progress as the sense of brazen indifference to the law expands. Damage to property such as files in a file cabinet, computers and the records they hold could escalate the number of charges that might be made.

Almost any defiant or intimidating motion with a gun caught on video could ramp up federal charges in a hurry.

Personally, I think the feds don't want Bundy to be seen as a political prisoner whose incarceration will feed more militia mischief, but Bundy and his gangs' behavior are what will define the response.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
109. Sheldon Adelson pretty much runs Nevada
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 09:44 AM
Jan 2016

I'm betting there is some money from Sheldon bankrolling this.

greymattermom

(5,754 posts)
113. can the government stop their direct deposits?
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 10:21 AM
Jan 2016

If you occupy a federal property illegally, is there a way to put a temporary stop on you social security, medicare,etc.?

sybylla

(8,526 posts)
116. Why not let them have their seige?
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 10:31 AM
Jan 2016

Cut their power. Block any one from going in or out, with fencing if necessary. Cut off communications. And forget about them.

Let them stew until they run out of food and water. By election day, they'll be canibalizing one another - figuratively or literally.

dmosh42

(2,217 posts)
137. You have the correct answer. But also need to isolate from any assistance,plus warning of .......
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 11:49 AM
Jan 2016

arrest on exit. Any form of resistance to be met with deadly force.

randr

(12,417 posts)
118. Great opportunity for our home land security forces
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 10:47 AM
Jan 2016

to show us how they would respond if these clowns were real terrorists.
I know I will feel a whole lot better about how safe our homeland security forces can keep us. I think a real siege to remove these trespassers from public property is called for.

Munificence

(493 posts)
173. You are fucking crazy for
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 03:02 PM
Jan 2016

thinking like that.

The moment that shit happens is the moment this thing blows up.

Oh and for anyone interested in the "Big Picture", here is a link that should get everyone up-to-date that shows what all has gone on "over the years" that has led up to this point.

https://www.superstation95.com/index.php/world/723

BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
186. Bullshit.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 04:44 PM
Jan 2016

"this thing" isn't going to blow up. It will fizzle. A bunch of delusional cowards think they can use threat and bluster to get their way. The government failed to deal with the Bundy crimes decisively, so now we've got these clowns.

Strong government action is needed to show this behavior is illegal and will be dealt with to the full extent of the law.

Munificence

(493 posts)
194. So what you
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 05:55 PM
Jan 2016

are saying and based on my response to the person above, you do not think that calling in 82 Airborne to kill of of these idiots would cause major problems? I'd like to think you'd rise up against being that our military is to never be used against it's civilians.....FUCKING PERIOD.

Now you think long and hard about that for awhile. And if you were just responding to my post and not taking into consideration what I was responding to, then you should from now on.


BillZBubb

(10,650 posts)
200. The poster you attacked NEVER suggested what you claim. Again BULLSHIT!
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 06:18 PM
Jan 2016

He said specifically "Homeland Security". Maybe you should read the post YOU are responding to first.

randr

(12,417 posts)
224. Thanks for the clarity on that BillZBubb
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 10:03 AM
Jan 2016

I would be totally against the use of US military forces to be used enforcing civil law. I have enough problems with the so called DHLS.
We do need to start understanding that the threat within our borders from fright wing terrorists is real. Too many attacks on Americans have been blamed on "mental problems" already and we need to call this for what it is.
There is a heavily armed contingent of misdirected and under educated radical extremists who think they have some right to usurp the rule of law.
If an example of American Justice, apprehension and fair trial, is not applied we are asking for more of the same and the incidents will only grow larger.

randr

(12,417 posts)
198. So I am "fucking crazy"?
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 06:11 PM
Jan 2016

A response to this sort of idiocy would show the vast majority of American's that fucking around with guns on public property is not acceptable. You must be scared shitless already by the gun nuts if you think the world will blow up if we stand up to the bullies.

Earth_First

(14,910 posts)
119. Why does the media and government coddle these individuals every time?
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 10:47 AM
Jan 2016

Every time this isn't nipped immediately, they are emboldened when their next temper tantrum surfaces.

Go in, full tactical, and make a scene that shows this shit will not be tolerated.

End story.

 

ehrnst

(32,640 posts)
148. Because that would trigger the ammosexual foil hat brigade
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 12:48 PM
Jan 2016

They are incredibly pissed that Obama hasn't fulfilled their apocalyptic wet dreams, and this is one of their last chances to get validation.

It's like ISIS - they want the full out war, they want the heroic, out in blaze of glory movie ending. Ruby Ridge and Waco fanned the flames, it didn't discourage them.

They want to show the world that "their patriotism" isn't tolerated.

bluedigger

(17,087 posts)
130. Where are all the toys we bought for the drug war? Let's use them.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 11:23 AM
Jan 2016

Get one of those helicopters with thermal imagery they use to find kids using bongs in the garage, and a guy with a .50 cal sniper rifle. Identify and target their generators. The insurrectionists will never hear the shots.

HereSince1628

(36,063 posts)
145. I'd say their a bunch of piss-ants, where's the terror?
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 12:35 PM
Jan 2016

They take over an unprotected, insecure small ranch-style house turned small office in a remote area with virtually no one around.

I'm not really terrified of a group that has the power and enormous courage it takes to seize the the imposing federal building housing offices to manage protection of flora and fauna.

onecaliberal

(32,900 posts)
153. If Muslims did the same thing or African Americans they would be called
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 12:58 PM
Jan 2016

Terrorists. I don't care how frightening they are or not. The fact is if these idiots were not white reicht wingers the police would have already taken them all out. We would be watching that building 24/7 on corporate news. It would be "a big fucking deal"

 

trillion

(1,859 posts)
187. I was thinking that the first time I saw this article. Yep, the'd have already had incindery devices
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 04:47 PM
Jan 2016

thrown in and the police would justify their deaths because they're armed and in a takeover situation.

whereisjustice

(2,941 posts)
139. Now you know why NRA wants guns for every right wing nut job. Yet we'll treat them like heroes...
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 11:54 AM
Jan 2016

instead of the terrorists, extremists and traitors that they are.

The Green Manalishi

(1,054 posts)
152. If they want to her martyrs, fine.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 12:57 PM
Jan 2016

SEAL team practice time.

I loathe any and everything that messes with the public infrastructure, left or right, roads or buildings; if it belongs to the people as a whole then any and all means are valid in removing those who would impede its use. and preferably means that leave a stark warning to any other miscreants. If you want to protest, get a permit and a scheduled time.

I hope they are made an example of that would shock the Romans.

Champion Jack

(5,378 posts)
155. Take out their supply trailers, blow up their vehicles, cut them off
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 01:02 PM
Jan 2016

...then bring in the big water drop planes.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
169. This is the key statement
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:49 PM
Jan 2016
The occupation is being led by hard-core militia who adopted the Hammond cause as their own.


This isn't about the Hammonds at all, for the "Bundy" militia group that took over the forest admin buildings. This is about their own personal battle against the government, and they don't even care if the Hammonds end up going back to jail.

Why oh why did Oregon have to be their "last stand"? Because I do think this is going to be another Ruby Ridge.
 

trillion

(1,859 posts)
183. you're right about the anti gov yahoos but the let's get the point
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 04:40 PM
Jan 2016

These anti-gov yahoos were created by the extreme right who are funded by corporations to make them want to de-regulate everything so they can rape it.

Follow the money. This is about the asset of Federal land. Wonder if the Kochys want to frack it. A corporation wants it and if they can get it de-regulated they will try to get all protected lands de-regulated so they can rape them. These yahoos are pawns.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
184. You might be right, but
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 04:42 PM
Jan 2016

I personally don't believe most sovereignists and survivalists and right wing militants are fueled and funded by corporations.

 

trillion

(1,859 posts)
214. The koches tea party movement is all about appealing to those people.
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 10:39 PM
Jan 2016

Remember the Koches have a brother who ran for president as a libertarian - these anti-gov people's original home. The Koches created far more of them out of republicans to form the Tea Party.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
230. Sorry, I just don't buy it
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 01:16 PM
Jan 2016

The Kochs are too smart and have too much to lose to be running around funding militant groups of crazy people. Of course they will pay for advertising to win conservative votes to keep their candidates in office, but that's a whole different ballgame than funding crazy militant groups.

 

Bradical79

(4,490 posts)
172. How important is the building?
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 02:58 PM
Jan 2016

Can we lock them in and just cut them off from communications and supplies?

Teamster Jeff

(1,598 posts)
190. Why do Feds treat this like some impossibly delicate situation?
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 05:00 PM
Jan 2016

Give them a chance to give themselves up. Then take back the building by force. Lock up the survivors.

Qutzupalotl

(14,331 posts)
205. Update from the Harney County sheriff:
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 07:46 PM
Jan 2016

(emphasis mine)

On January 2, 2015 in Harney County, Oregon a group of men and women seized the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge Headquarters located in Harney County, Oregon. The refuge headquarters was empty at the time of the seizure due to it being the weekend.

These men came to Harney County claiming to be part of militia groups supporting local ranchers, when in reality these men had alternative motives to attempt to over throw the county and federal government in hopes to spark a movement across the United States.

We are currently working jointly with several organizations to make sure the citizens of Harney County are safe and this issue is resolved as quickly and peaceful as possible. At this time we do not have any information that any other areas in Harney County are in immediate danger.

We ask that people stay away from the refuge for their safety. We also ask that if anyone sees any of these individuals in the area to please contact law enforcement and do not confront the individuals themselves.

We are currently working to establish 1-800 phone lines for people to call if they have questions. More information will be provided as it is available.


David M. Ward, Sheriff

classof56

(5,376 posts)
206. So, Bundy and his gang of idiots are occupying the Malheur Refuge?
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 09:23 PM
Jan 2016

As an Oregonian, I really must take issue with that. The Malheur is one of the most extraordinary scenic areas in the Southeast section of our amazing state, and a wonder to visit and enjoy.

It can be Googled for info regarding its significance, but I cribbed this write-up from Wikipedia, just to share a bit about it: Numerous wildlife occurs in the area, with as many as 320 species of birds and 58 species of mammals found in the refuge. A large number of birds and mammals can be found amongst the deserts, grasslands, marshes and rimrock. Malheur serves as a Pacific Flyway stop for the northern pintail and tundra swan, lesser and greater sandhill crane, snow goose and Ross’ goose. Ducks, grebes, pelicans and trumpeter swans are drawn to the numerous ponds, marshes and lakes. Deer, antelopes, ducks, pheasants, thrashers and quails can be found in the upland areas amongst the sagebrush, greasewood and wild rye.

I've been there many times, and it never fails to call me back to savor the beauty that Mother Nature offers there. It's maintained by a staff of knowledgeable and caring individuals whose job it is to preserve the Refuge and all its inhabitants, along with interpreting the incredible history of the area. I have this notion that Bundy and his Crowd are not interested in the mission of the Refuge, and could care less about its current or future preservation.

They've closed down the public access to the interpretive center? Damn them! As Thom Hartmann says, we the people are the government, and as such, I say it's time to get proactive about this blatant takeover of one of our facilities. Plus, a lot of Oregonians don't take too kindly to this kind of crap. Remember our state motto: She Flies with Her Own Wings. I don't live far from the Refuge and I'm more than ready to soar over there and raise a ruckous or two.

Cheers.

 

Elmer S. E. Dump

(5,751 posts)
215. The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) defines terrorism as:
Sun Jan 3, 2016, 11:42 PM
Jan 2016

“the unlawful use of force or violence against persons or property to intimidate or coerce a government, the civilian population, or any segment thereof, in furtherance of political or social objectives.”

They are terrorists.

PersonNumber503602

(1,134 posts)
217. What exactly is the backstory on this?
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 12:05 AM
Jan 2016

I'm clicking around the articles, but I'm not finding much. Anyone have any hints?

PersonNumber503602

(1,134 posts)
218. Okay.. For those who still don't know, here's some information.
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 01:08 AM
Jan 2016

I'm sure this has been posted elsewhere by now, but here it is anyway.

http://www.justice.gov/usao-or/pr/eastern-oregon-ranchers-convicted-arson-resentenced-five-years-prison


Here's a source that tells their side.

http://www.tsln.com/news/17302049-113/story.html


I read another article from another source called conservativetreehouse (I think?), but it came off a bit too bias. I suppose you could search and read it if you really wanna see how they are viewing/presenting it.


I think those two sources above offer a view from both sides though.

Strelnikov_

(7,772 posts)
231. Unless the witnesses lied, they deserve some time
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 01:44 PM
Jan 2016
Witnesses at trial, including a relative of the Hammonds, testified the arson occurred shortly after Steven Hammond and his hunting party illegally slaughtered several deer on BLM property. Jurors were told that Steven Hammond handed out “Strike Anywhere” matches with instructions that they be lit and dropped on the ground because they were going to “light up the whole country on fire.” One witness testified that he barely escaped the eight to ten foot high flames caused by the arson. The fire consumed 139 acres of public land and destroyed all evidence of the game violations. After committing the arson, Steven Hammond called the BLM office in Burns, Oregon and claimed the fire was started on Hammond property to burn off invasive species and had inadvertently burned onto public lands. Dwight and Steven Hammond told one of their relatives to keep his mouth shut and that nobody needed to know about the fire.

Tarc

(10,476 posts)
225. Where's Janet Reno when you need her?
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 10:08 AM
Jan 2016

They are terrorists, no ifs ands or buts.

Tanks and tear gas, clear it up.

Oneironaut

(5,525 posts)
232. Way overblown. Why is the media hyping this?
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 02:37 PM
Jan 2016

15 redneck losers take over an abandoned outpost in the middle of nowhere. " Zzomg they captured an abandoned building in the wilderness using a lock pick and are threatening the nonexistent people in the area! There's 150 (divided by 10) of them! They said they might get violent, just like how they always threaten violence but do nothing. Be afraid!"

 

workinclasszero

(28,270 posts)
234. If they were black....
Mon Jan 4, 2016, 03:30 PM
Jan 2016

and were armed with toy guns..they would all be dead by now.

Why does America rail against foreign terrorist and coddle its own homegrown terrorists?

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Militia takes over Malheu...