Text, Don't Call When Natural Disaster Strikes
Source: nyt/reuters
It is better to send text messages than to call when natural disasters strike and networks get congested, a senior U.S. official said on Wednesday, also urging people to add battery-powered cell phone chargers to their storm emergency kits.
Read more: http://www.nytimes.com/reuters/2012/05/30/arts/30reuters-usa-weather-storms.html?hp
slackmaster
(60,567 posts)In the power outage that affected large areas of Southern California last September, most cell phone coverage was completely down for many hours.
Semaphores, smoke signals, and mental telepathy were more useful than cell phones. So were old-fashioned land phone lines.
elleng
(130,950 posts)here on right coast, last year big storms, daughters and I were ONLY able to use texting, and it did work. (And only one of us has land-line.)
dipsydoodle
(42,239 posts)a pair of bean cans and piece of string.
wysi
(1,512 posts)I live in Christchurch, New Zealand which has been hit by multiple major earthquakes over the last 20 months (including 5 over magnitude 6). The cell towers here keep working as they have backup battery power, and we found that texts get through when calls won't.
elleng
(130,950 posts)BadgerKid
(4,552 posts)Text messages are part of the communications overhead traffic anyway.
(Text plans are pure profit for cell providers, but that's another story.)
liberal N proud
(60,335 posts)Our office has an instant messanger on all PC's and mobile devices. I have a permanent message that says "I have a phone, a door and email, instant message is one interruption I do not a low."
I hate the intrusion, because they see you are using your keyboard or mouse and they expect you to drop everything and address their needs.
EFerrari
(163,986 posts)when Loma Prieta hit. Two of us had cell phones at that time but most of them had beepers. Nothing worked for many hours.
In case of a natural disaster, make a plan that includes as little tech as possible.
wysi
(1,512 posts)The cell system is most likely considerably more robust than it was in 1989. But I agree with respect to having a back-up plan. Fortunately for us when our "big one" hit in February 2011 my wife was working right next door to one of our kids' schools and just down the street from the other, so she had them safely rounded up in less than an hour. I was forced to abandon the car and walk home, which took more than two hours from where I work.
EFerrari
(163,986 posts)For me, that was the worst part of not staying home with them. I gave up a good job in the city to be closer to them because I finally decided the anxiety wasn't worth the money.
You're right about the cell system. Even so, maybe living in earthquake country my whole life, I just don't expect to rely on utilities when things start moving.