Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,601 posts)
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 07:25 PM Jan 2016

Judge tosses civil case against Chicago officer in shooting

Source: Associated Press

Judge tosses civil case against Chicago officer in shooting

Michael Tarm, Associated Press

Updated 4:57 pm, Thursday, January 21, 2016

CHICAGO (AP) — A federal judge again criticized the city of Chicago Thursday for how it dealt with a police-shooting video as he tossed a civil case against one of two officers involved in a fatal 2013 shooting of a black teenager suspected in a carjacking.

Judge Robert Gettleman's ruling cites video of Cedrick Chatman's shooting that was unsealed last week and shows that Officer Lou Toth didn't shoot at the 17-year-old. Gettleman says it also shows Toth could not have stopped his partner, Kevin Fry, from firing the fatal shots.

The civil case, brought by Chatman's mother, will proceed against Fry. Neither officer was ever charged criminally.

Before allowing the video to be made public last week, Gettleman criticized the city for its about-face — for battling against its release on legal grounds for months only to suddenly declare that it supported the video release on policy grounds.

Read more: http://www.chron.com/news/crime/article/Judge-tosses-civil-case-against-Chicago-officer-6774623.php

4 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Judge tosses civil case against Chicago officer in shooting (Original Post) Judi Lynn Jan 2016 OP
YAY!!! DONUTS FOR EVERYONE! SoCalMusicLover Jan 2016 #1
In light of the video, branford Jan 2016 #3
Seems logical to me Travis_0004 Jan 2016 #2
There's no point in going after cops who DON'T shoot unarmed black kids. Chemisse Jan 2016 #4
 

branford

(4,462 posts)
3. In light of the video,
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 08:56 PM
Jan 2016

would you kindly explain an actual legal theory that could sustain any civil liability against Officer Toth?

The officer who actually fired the shots, and could not have been reasonably prevented from doing so, is still in the case.

"Cops are pigs" is not a recognized tort in any jurisdiction in the USA.

 

Travis_0004

(5,417 posts)
2. Seems logical to me
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 07:38 PM
Jan 2016

One should not be liable for the actions of his partner when it happened that quickly.

Chemisse

(30,816 posts)
4. There's no point in going after cops who DON'T shoot unarmed black kids.
Thu Jan 21, 2016, 09:29 PM
Jan 2016

Luckily for this cop, the video was released and he was cleared from the civil suit.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Judge tosses civil case a...