John Lewis: 'I never saw' Sanders at civil rights events
Source: CNN
Washington (CNN)Democratic Rep. John Lewis on Thursday questioned the extent of Bernie Sanders' participation in the civil rights movement after an event where the Congressional Black Caucus political action committee endorsed Hillary Clinton.
Sanders has frequently talked up his history as an activist while he was at the University of Chicago in the 1960s and touted his work with the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee. But Lewis, a civil rights icon and leader of SNCC said he never saw Sanders at any events.
"I never saw him. I never met him," Lewis said. "I was chair of the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee for three years, from 1963 to 1966. I was involved with the sit-ins, the Freedom Rides, the March on Washington, the march from Selma to Montgomery and directed (the) voter education project for six years. But I met Hillary Clinton. I met President (Bill) Clinton."
The Sanders campaign did not immediately respond to multiple requests for comment from CNN Thursday.
Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2016/02/11/politics/john-lewis-bernie-sanders-civil-rights/index.html
LiberalArkie
(15,728 posts)Of course I was at the end of it.
kracer20
(199 posts)When did John Lewis first meet Bill Clinton?
ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)Poor John. It is tough losing one's memory over many decades.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)I think they were in different orgs too. I have no idea why this is controversial
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)Last edited Fri Feb 12, 2016, 02:21 AM - Edit history (1)
It's fine that Lewis never saw Bernie Sanders.
It's fine that Lewis has met the Clintons.
But the way Lewis phrased it, he seemed to be implying that Sanders wasn't a civil rights activist, at least not in the Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee, and that Lewis met the Clintons as fellow 1960s civil rights activists.
Sanders was a civil rights activist.
In a book by Lewis, he wrote that he first heard of Bill Clinton in the early 1970s.
Update: Bernie Sanders worked with SNCC as the president of a chapter of CORE, but wasn't a member of SNCC.
Jarqui
(10,130 posts)When did he first meet him?
randys1
(16,286 posts)statement, he is simply above criticism on this issue, and that is difficult for some to understand.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)No one is above criticism when they make a mistaken, misleading, or intentionally false statement to impugn the character of another.
NowSam
(1,252 posts)I like Lewis but this was not his most shining moment. I bet there are multitudes who matched that he never met.
Duckfan
(1,268 posts)Can't say you didn't see Bernie march in Chicago if you were in DC.
I didn't think Mr. Lewis would make such a non-nonsensical statement.
But then again, he met Bill Clinton. So that must mean we simply have to STFU and not question his statement.
NOT!
6chars
(3,967 posts)Champion Jack
(5,378 posts)NanceGreggs
(27,817 posts)... "mistaken, misleading, or intentionally false" about John Lewis' statement? How did he impugn the character of another?
trillion
(1,859 posts)Let me guess you also can't tell that Hillary is bought and sold by wall street.
I bet if you ask progress dems they can explain it to you.
NanceGreggs
(27,817 posts)What was "mistaken, misleading, or intentionally false" about John Lewis' statement? How did he impugn the character of another?
ChairmanAgnostic
(28,017 posts)Now you are obfuscating as much as Lewis.
NanceGreggs
(27,817 posts)No one seems able to answer it.
Why am I not surprised?
randys1
(16,286 posts)trillion
(1,859 posts)I will not accept this level of dishonest dialog. If you don't have honesty you have nothing.
Demonaut
(8,924 posts)Planetbarb
(2 posts)You are right. It is never OK to make misleading statements about another during a campaign especially for partisan reasons. Who knows what Lewis' reasons were. I did send an email to the CBC. Image label: Sanders, then chairman of the CORE social action committee, speaks to students at the 1962 sit-in. (UChicago Photographic Archive, apf4-01698, University of Chicago Library) image found on this page:
website source: http://mag.uchicago.edu/law-policy-society/political-education
Planetbarb Note, continued: Sanders was arrested in 1963 during civil rights work. Al Sharpton said he does remember Sanders and stated he did get arrested clear back in 1963 and has a good record on civil rights.
http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/video-audio/sanders-civil-rights-record 2 min video
DesertFlower
(11,649 posts)Jarqui
(10,130 posts)Nobody is above criticism. Not even John Lewis.
When I last checked, this is a democracy with freedom of expression rights.
If John gets out of line, he can be criticized like anyone else.
I think he got out of line today.
I can't endorse all he's getting as I haven't seen it all and some of it might be ugly. But there's no doubt in my mind, he deserves some criticism.
If one opens their mouth, they're accountable for what comes out of it. No free passes.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)UpInArms
(51,284 posts)i call bullshit
Duckfan
(1,268 posts)I voted for Obama. Doesn't mean I say things like, "oh, Obama is pushing for the TPP which will kill millions of American jobs. So I should still support him despite pushing legislation/approval of something that kills jobs".
bjobotts
(9,141 posts)ladjf
(17,320 posts)hollowdweller
(4,229 posts)Is he say Bernie is lying about his experiences?
Or is he just saying he didn't see him?
Seems like if he was lying it would be easy to check out.
Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)...but the implication is that Bernie Sanders lied about being a civil rights activist.
Sanders was involved in the campus chapter of the Congress on Racial Equality (CORE), another civil rights group:
During his junior year, Sanders, by then president of the university's CORE chapter, led a picket of a Howard Johnson's restaurant in Chicago, part of a coordinated nationwide protest against the motel and restaurant chain's racially discriminatory policies. Sanders eventually resigned his post at CORE, citing a heavy workload, and took some time off from school.
Under Sanders' leadership, the CORE group at University of Chicago joined forces with SNCC's campus chapter, held sit-ins to protest segregation in university-owned apartment buildings, and raised money for voter registration efforts focused on African Americans.
http://www.motherjones.com/mojo/2016/02/john-lewis-bernie-sanders-civil-rights
bjobotts
(9,141 posts)Bill needed the face time
Ahpook
(2,750 posts)At best
elmac
(4,642 posts)the group has circled their wagon around HRC, which is fine, but debating who was a better activist is childish and doesn't do anyone any good.
Planetbarb
(2 posts)I am not happy with the current trend of what the CBC stating.
Bernie Sanders was involved in Civil Rights, mostly at his local area since at least 1962. Here is a link to an image of him at a 1962 event a sit in about desegregating college dorms:
Sanders, then chairman of the CORE social action committee, speaks to students at the 1962 sit-in. (UChicago Photographic Archive, apf4-01698, University of Chicago Library)
website source: http://mag.uchicago.edu/law-policy-society/political-education
Planetbarb Note, continued: Sanders was arrested in 1963 and it is a matter of public record. Al Sharpton remembered Bernie and stated he did get arrested clear back in 1963 and has a good record on civil rights.
http://www.sanders.senate.gov/newsroom/video-audio/sanders-civil-rights-record 2 min video
Some black leaders have come out for Bernie Sanders past couple days...I watched one former NAACP leader last night.
I hope the main stream media releases those statement too and also hoping Bernie will made a really clear case of his civil rights record.
cyberpj
(10,794 posts)He'll have an arrest record.
pat_k
(9,313 posts)uhnope
(6,419 posts)Eric J in MN
(35,619 posts)2004: Bush allies imply John Kerry wasn't wounded in Vietnam.
2016: Clinton ally implies that Bernie Sanders wasn't a civil rights activist.
Plucketeer
(12,882 posts)newthinking
(3,982 posts)Manufacturing Drama...
rocktivity
(44,577 posts)Is Lewis accusing Sanders of something? Or is CNN accusing Lewis of accusing Sanders of something?
rocktivity
blackspade
(10,056 posts)Lewis probably never did meet him.
I belong to several organizations where I haven't met folks and we have all been members for years.
bravenak
(34,648 posts)tonybgood
(218 posts)to Jane Sanders knew everyone at Woodstock!!! lol
jalan48
(13,882 posts)Dr. Strange
(25,923 posts)when they both came under sniper fire.
jalan48
(13,882 posts)And she was standing up for the American workers.
chapdrum
(930 posts)Dont_Bogart_the_Pretzel
(3,273 posts)Maybe because I was stardust at the time might have something to do with it.
intheflow
(28,500 posts)while he was leading SNCC. She was still voting Republican at that time, although she had met MLK in 1962. And I've never seen any evidence that Bill was involved with SNCC, CORE, the Southern Poverty Law Center, the 1963 March on Washington, sit-ins, Freedom Summer or any civil rights actions in the 1960s. So... Is Lewis saying that's where he met Clinton and Rodham-Clinton? Because I think he's rewriting history.
chapdrum
(930 posts)Right.
In my book, any Democratic candidate for president that was formerly a Republican?
No effing way should be anywhere near the Oval Office (she lucked out once already).
ProudToBeBlueInRhody
(16,399 posts)No effing way should be anywhere near the Oval Office (she lucked out once already).
http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/189657--liberal-favorite-elizabeth-warren-admits-she-was-a-republican
In an interview with The Daily Beast released on Tuesday, Warren, 62, who recently began a bid to unseat Sen. Scott Brown (R-Mass.) admitted that up into her early 40s she was a Republican.
"I was a Republican because I thought that those were the people who best supported markets. I think that is not true anymore," Warren said. "I was a Republican at a time when I felt like there was a problem that the markets were under a lot more strain. It worried me whether or not the government played too activist a role."
Warren admitted though that she voted for both Democrats and Republicans.
But she declined to say whether she voted for Ronald Reagan in either his first presidential campaign or his reelection campaign.
chapdrum
(930 posts)Was not aware of this but, of course, by my standard, Warren would be undesirable.
I don't know that much about Warren, nor for that matter, Sanders - since all of our candidates are routinely
reduced to sound bytes, especially during debates/"debates."
TexasMommaWithAHat
(3,212 posts)like a former smoker who has quit and seen the light.
Just saying'
SusanLarson
(284 posts)I hate to say it, but Mr Lewis has already made clear exactly where his loyalties lay. He is either being forgetful or outright dishonest to support his candidate of choice.
Bernie Sander's record in Civil rights is just as unquestionable as Mr Lewis. Does Mr Lewis suggest that he intimately remembers everyone involved in the civil rights movement.
"The Student Nonviolent Coordinating Committee (SNCC), as an organization, began with an $800.00 grant from the Southern Christian Leadership Conference (SCLC) for a conference attended by 126 student delegates from 58 sit-in centers in 12 states, along with delegates from 19 northern colleges, the SCLC, Congress of Racial Equality (CORE), Fellowship of Reconciliation (FOR), National Student Association (NSA), and Students for a Democratic Society (SDS). Out of this conference the SNCC was formed.[7][8]"
Bernie Sanders was a activist with for the Congress for Racial Equality in Chicago, and would have likely been directly involved in the formation of the SNCC.
Hissyspit
(45,788 posts)Disappointing from Lewis.
ladjf
(17,320 posts)SELMA, Ala., March 7 U.S. Sen. Bernie Sanders (I-Vt.) today joined U.S. Rep. John Lewis (D-Ga.) and other civil rights pioneers on the 50th anniversary of an historic civil rights march that led to enactment of the Voting Rights Act.
Rep. Lewis must have forgotten about that civil rights event.
yardwork
(61,701 posts)That's not what I understood Lewis to say.
pandr32
(11,608 posts)It made them instantly interesting and cool to chat with at the party, that is until you realized they were not really "at" Woodstock--but somewhere else in New York and maybe say a hippie hitch-hiking. At most they drove nearby and saw that there was no way to park without walking miles into the event and it started to rain so they left. They really had no insight or wonderful stories other than the ones that were on the news.
SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)....
RATM435
(392 posts)rocktivity
(44,577 posts)once you've established a high and low range...
rocktivity
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)involved, which seems likely to me.
Tempest
(14,591 posts)That shows Lewis and Sanders standing side by side in the 60s at a civil rights protest?
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)maybe he doesn't remember every body he met 40+ years ago. I tend to give Lewis a little leeway- he has earned respect.
JDPriestly
(57,936 posts)we met back in the 1960s. We just don't. Impossible to remember everyone.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)and don't remember the name of my best friend in 5th grade
former9thward
(32,071 posts)Lucinda
(31,170 posts)TexasMommaWithAHat
(3,212 posts)yardwork
(61,701 posts)WestSeattle2
(1,730 posts)past - and current - support for racial equality, it should go without saying that attacking Bernie's character in such a manner is despicable.
SoLeftIAmRight
(4,883 posts)Shame!
UpInArms
(51,284 posts)the clintons never never never marched
such a pile of shit
John Lewis
you make me sad
Tempest
(14,591 posts)There's a photo being shared on social media that shows Sanders and Lewis side by side at a civil rights protest.
Lewis should be ashamed of lowering himself to such lies.
UpInArms
(51,284 posts)one must possess a conscience
Paladin
(28,272 posts)An honorable, life-long Democrat and civil rights veteran such as John Lewis casts some doubt on Bernie Sanders, and his followers go fully ballistic. Is all this part of that "revolution" you Bernie Purists keep shrieking about? Hillary looks better and better.
redstateblues
(10,565 posts)We cannot tolerate anything that does not heap praise on Bernie
curiouso
(57 posts)Sad as it may seem, in politics as in most other aspects of life, the allegation may not be the truth but it's all some people remember. The media aggravate the phenomenon: Allegations are published on Page One under 60-point headlines. Corrections are seldom harder to find - they're brief, to the point and in 10-point type...and hidden somewhere inside.
musiclawyer
(2,335 posts)The people are sick of being lied to and financially abused. It's 2016 and if mother Theresa had said it the people would call her out with expletives if necessary. By your reasoning years of public service means you get a freebie to distort --which is a subset of untruthfulness
The Revolution will not be televised. People are either part of the solution or part of the problem, elected or otherwise. Get used to it.
UpInArms
(51,284 posts)but where in the world did he "see Hillary and President Clinton"?
that is just crap
and politicizing
it doesn't matter who I support - I don't like lying crapweasels out there spouting nonsense
former9thward
(32,071 posts)And not photo shopped.
phleshdef
(11,936 posts)womanofthehills
(8,759 posts)Cryptoad
(8,254 posts)do dah, do dah, all do dah day!
ProfessorGAC
(65,160 posts)"I didn't see him" may be the truth but it is relevant to what? If there are a half-million people at a march, there are good odds that there are a lot of somebodies one didn't see.
So, how does this matter?
Helen Borg
(3,963 posts)davsand
(13,421 posts)Last time I was on a picket live or at a protest there was no receiving line. You are NOT gonna meet everybody or even see them if it is a big enough turnout. Lewis is speaking his truth and it does seem like the various camps and supporters are twisting and turning it to make it about their interest and their candidate.
I'm all for a robust debate and campaigns, but the vitriol from both the Clinton and the Sanders supporters is hitting high gear lately. This whole Lewis flap is just one example. "She did _____" "Well, HE did ______" is getting mighty common these days, and it bodes well for the GOP if it keeps on at this rate.
Laura
BillZBubb
(10,650 posts)I almost feel sorry for the guy. He just pissed on his reputation.
Response to onehandle (Original post)
Mosby This message was self-deleted by its author.
Stellar
(5,644 posts)So, Rep John Lewis, since he was there...why didn't he meet Senator Bernie Sanders, of all the hundreds of people that were there? That question can be turned around too, you know.
But I met Hillary Clinton. I met President (Bill) Clinton."
So he says he met Hillary(if she was a Goldwater girl then, who knows?), she would have been at least 15 to 18 and Bill would have been from 17 to 20 years old? Rep Lewis is saying he met them back then?
Lauren Victoria Burke, managing editor, Politics365com asked Rep Lewis when did he see/meet Hillary and Bill Clinton during the civil rights movement and he didn't answer that question, and that she says this was unusual for him because he never really pass up a time to answer questions on the civil rights movement. She also says she don't understand why Rep Lewis blew off Bernie Sanders at that announcement. But she thinks it's payback because Sanders met with Al Sharpton and Harry Belafonte, Erica Gardner and they probably rushed to give Hillary the endorsement because of this.