Nevada’s most powerful Latino turnout machine is sitting this race out
Source: MSNBC
LAS VEGAS Minority voters on Saturday will play a critical role for the very first time this election, and yet, the major powerhouse that typically drives Latinos to the polls is instead staying out of the process almost entirely. Nevadas influential Culinary Union has shied away from activating its massive voter mobilization machine, leaving the bulk of its political organizing on ice after union leaders decided to hold back on endorsing a presidential candidate just yet. But Culinary is not just declining to chose sides. In fact, the union has done uncharacteristically little to ensure that its 57,000 members nearly half of whom are Hispanic will turn out to caucus on Saturday. ...
The unions absence from the political process is a major hit to the campaigns and state Democratic leaders hoping to see voter turnout exceed expectations. Nevada only just gained its early-state status in the Democratic primary in 2008, largely thanks to its growing Latino population, which now stands at more than 17 percent of eligible voters. But many voters are still new to caucusing. Language barriers add an extra layer of intimidation to an already unfamiliar process.
...
There are signs that the Clinton campaign is feeling anxious about its lock on Latino voters without Culinary to draw members to caucus. A flurry of top Clinton surrogates and icons in the Latino community have worked the circuit of hotels and casinos along the Las Vegas strip, meeting with housekeepers, bartenders and back of house workers in break rooms during their time off.
Dolores Huerta, a legendary civil rights activist with the United Farm Workers union, and Virginia Sen. Tim Kaine courted casino workers this week. Rep. Luis Gutiérrez, a prominent backer of comprehensive immigration reform, met with union leaders in Las Vegas the week before. Huerta, a longtime Clinton supporter, said she was so disappointed to find that Culinary workers were not even aware of the approaching caucus that she planned to take issue up with union leaders directly.
Read more: http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/nevadas-most-powerful-latino-turnout-machine-sitting-out-race
LOL at Clinton surrogates accosting these poor union workers in their breaks rooms after the Clinton campaign lambasted Sanders supporters for the last month for doing the exact same thing.
DhhD
(4,695 posts)whereas, Sanders has been working for a long time on living wage. Senator Sanders and colleagues have Bills on minimum wage in Congressional committees.
Chicago1980
(1,968 posts)Ned Flanders
(233 posts)Are they sitting it out because union leadership are concerned that the majority of its members support Bernie Sanders?
I caught part of an interview with a Hispanic gentleman who was conspicuously quiet about Bernie, while politely praising Hillary. Sorry I didn't catch his name, but the odd bit was that this guy said he recently switched to the Republican party, after 48 years as a Democrat.
MisterFred
(525 posts)I was reading a story a few weeks ago that said there's some pretty bad blood between the Culinary Workers & Hillary from back in the 2008 election. They theory was that leadership would have supported her & turned on the turnout machine, except she pissed them off.
Not the article I was thinking of, but this covers the basics:
http://www.latimes.com/nation/politics/la-na-hillary-clinton-nevada-union-20150503-story.html
blackspade
(10,056 posts)On one hand I like it that the CU is not endorsing either candidate.
But the fact that they are not motivating their members to caucus does their members and the Democratic party no favors.
I would have liked to see them GOTV as a matter of policy regardless of partisan leanings.
Person 2713
(3,263 posts)The union workers need to be engaged if they want to change the state primary outcome. It won't happen at home , or even on overtime unfortunately
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)GOTV either way!
elleng
(131,077 posts)SOMEONE was with them early.
https://www.facebook.com/MartinOMalley/videos/10156078179550393/
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2015/08/19/while-in-vegas-omalley-to-stand-with-workers-seeking-to-unionize-at-trumps-hotel/
http://www.nbcnews.com/news/latino/martin-omalley-makes-nevada-stop-about-workers-immigration-n412726
rpannier
(24,334 posts)They should have let their members know they were not endorsing but should have told them when the two caucuses are
Starry Messenger
(32,342 posts)I don't care who the CU didn't endorse, but unions are a key player in the democratic process. I wouldn't care if every last member caucused for Bernie-- this is labor malpractice.
SunSeeker
(51,662 posts)Bernie Sanders Aides Accused of Posing as Union Members to Access Hotels in Las Vegas
http://gawker.com/bernie-sanders-aides-accused-of-posing-as-union-members-1755793927
The Culinary union was incensed about what the Sanders aides did. http://www.democraticunderground.com/12511083889
The Clinton supporters did not misrepresent who they were, they did not gain access to otherwise secure union break rooms posing as union members with union buttons, like the Sanders aides did.
MisterFred
(525 posts)They may or may not have been incensed, but it didn't affect their efforts or lack thereof in the race.
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)Seriously, how did Clinton supporters "gain access" to the break rooms of these union members?
What special top 0.1% channels did they have to go through to "gain access" denied to supporters of a non-elite candidate?
SunSeeker
(51,662 posts)From your link:
The Clinton supporters, most of whom were public figures known to the union members, were obviously allowed in by the union members or union leaders at the various locations they visited, most of which were not "break rooms." No one has compained about them misrepresenting who they were or otherwise pulling a stunt like the Sanders campaign.
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)THEY can go WHEREVER and do WHATEVER they damn well please, unlike us peons who are restricted from expressing ourselves unless we have previously obtained documented establishment approval
SunSeeker
(51,662 posts)Instead, the campaign pulled the masquerade stunt.
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)Who exactly told them it was OK for them to accost union members in their break rooms in order to advocate for Clinton?
SunSeeker
(51,662 posts)And per your link, most of the Clinton supporter encounters were in public spaces, so it does not appear an ask was needed.
Chicago1980
(1,968 posts)I don't have the time or patience for this crap. It's plain laziness.
I'm not in a union but I support them. However, if people can't get out and vote on their own, it's hard to have sympathy when people complain. How can one not be aware of an election/caucus?
mhatrw
(10,786 posts)Or because "one" is not well acquainted with the bizarre historical caucusing traditions of a small number of US states?
Chicago1980
(1,968 posts)When it comes to the 'not speaking english well', they'd have to know a decent amount to be a citizen and or registered.