Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

ericson00

(2,707 posts)
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 05:00 PM Feb 2016

Iranian media outlets add to bounty for killing Britain's Rushdie

Source: Reuters

Iranian state-run media outlets have added $600,000 to a bounty for the killing of British author Salman Rushdie imposed in 1989 over the publishing of his book "The Satanic Verses".

The leader of Iran's 1979 Islamic revolution, the late Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini, issued a fatwa, or religious edict, that called on Muslims to the kill the author after his book was condemned as blasphemous, forcing him into years of hiding.

Iranian hardliners say Khomeini's decree is irrevocable and eternal after his death. A wealthy Iranian religious organization offered $2.7 million reward to anyone carrying out the fatwa and in 2012 it increased the amount to $3.3 million.

The semi-official Fars news agency published a list of 40 news outlets adding to the pot. Fars itself earmarked $30,000.

Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-iran-rushdie-idUSKCN0VV1TI



Pure evil jihad terror on the part of Iran.

GO RUSHDIE!
30 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Iranian media outlets add to bounty for killing Britain's Rushdie (Original Post) ericson00 Feb 2016 OP
this is in the name of the religion MariaThinks Feb 2016 #1
Oh, well, that explains it. Carry on Iran. Elmer S. E. Dump Feb 2016 #3
yeah, really! 7962 Feb 2016 #14
Under a conservative GOP president, America would be no different. ChairmanAgnostic Feb 2016 #2
especially if that GOP president's name started with TRUMP olddad56 Feb 2016 #4
If he wins, I start digging a fallout shelter. ChairmanAgnostic Feb 2016 #5
Nononono. Speak these words aloud: "Ayatollah Ted Cruz" DetlefK Feb 2016 #26
Sadly Cruz is 1000x the nut bag Trump is. Oneironaut Feb 2016 #28
hyperbole isn't helpful. I don't like the GOP either, but no, their people in power ericson00 Feb 2016 #7
who is intentionally innocent? ChairmanAgnostic Feb 2016 #8
What do you mean they only kill terrorists? passiveporcupine Feb 2016 #16
Wish-fool thinking, ChairmanAgnostic Feb 2016 #22
But I thought the Iran nuclear deal Angel Martin Feb 2016 #6
It has. Their religious right is reacting just like ours. ChairmanAgnostic Feb 2016 #9
I don't see the teabaggers leftynyc Feb 2016 #10
give them time. ChairmanAgnostic Feb 2016 #11
Twisting yourself into a pretzel leftynyc Feb 2016 #13
It just never stops. The false equivalency EVERY time. 7962 Feb 2016 #15
Unbelievable leftynyc Feb 2016 #21
Where did you get that idea from? nt bananas Feb 2016 #12
from the man himself Angel Martin Feb 2016 #17
That doesn't say anything about "non-theocratic elements". nt bananas Feb 2016 #19
you are right, Obama refers to "Hardliners" and "The majority of the Iranian people" Angel Martin Feb 2016 #20
no it was to prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon karynnj Feb 2016 #23
Funny; I remember when NK was "years" away from a nuke. Then they tested one. 7962 Feb 2016 #24
no valid comparison, thanks to the careful work of Moniz karynnj Feb 2016 #25
I'm not sure what you're advocating. Bradical79 Feb 2016 #27
The result will be more countries in the ME getting nukes. 7962 Feb 2016 #29
If they cheat, they cheat Bradical79 Feb 2016 #30
A lot of this seems based on internal politics: far-righties trying to position themselves against LeftishBrit Feb 2016 #18

ChairmanAgnostic

(28,017 posts)
2. Under a conservative GOP president, America would be no different.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 05:02 PM
Feb 2016

Hell, we already kill people without a hearing, without proof, without a court of law. We call them drone attacks.

Oneironaut

(5,504 posts)
28. Sadly Cruz is 1000x the nut bag Trump is.
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 02:36 PM
Feb 2016

I would take Trump any day of the week over him. Trump is an inept goofball, but Cruz is a hardcore end-times Conservative who would love nothing other than to start launching nukes so that Jesus can come sooner.

He's literally that guy on The Dead Zone.

 

ericson00

(2,707 posts)
7. hyperbole isn't helpful. I don't like the GOP either, but no, their people in power
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 05:23 PM
Feb 2016

in politics and government are not offering millions of dollars to kill people over speeches/books that don't incite to violence (like Satanic Verses).

And the drones only kill terrorists, not intentionally innocent people.

ChairmanAgnostic

(28,017 posts)
8. who is intentionally innocent?
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 05:25 PM
Feb 2016

And have you been sticking your head in the desert sand, ignoring the many, MANY civilians that we (belatedly) admit to having done in in drone strikes?

ChairmanAgnostic

(28,017 posts)
9. It has. Their religious right is reacting just like ours.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 05:26 PM
Feb 2016

Once they see falling support, especially among the youth, they get scared, and then, they act out in crazy ways. Just like our Tea Baggers.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
10. I don't see the teabaggers
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 05:38 PM
Feb 2016

collecting their social security checks and putting a bounty on anyone's head.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
13. Twisting yourself into a pretzel
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 05:44 PM
Feb 2016

and making "coming soon" predictions hardly makes you seem like you really give a shit about telling the truth about this. Religious freaks in Iran are doing this NOW, with REAL MONEY....making comparisons to American teabaggers - whom I loathe - is dishonest and just looks like deflection bullshit.

 

leftynyc

(26,060 posts)
21. Unbelievable
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 06:03 AM
Feb 2016

And I wont let even one story pass where I'll allow it anymore without jumping in. Enough of this bullshit.

Angel Martin

(942 posts)
20. you are right, Obama refers to "Hardliners" and "The majority of the Iranian people"
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 11:05 PM
Feb 2016

"Just because Iranian hardliners chant "Death to America" does not mean that that's what all Iranians believe. In fact, it's those...

(APPLAUSE)

In fact, it's those hardliners who are most comfortable with the status quo. It's those hardliners chanting "Death to America" who have been most opposed to the deal. They're making common cause with the Republican Caucus.

(APPLAUSE)

The majority of the Iranian people have powerful incentives to urge their government to move in a different, less provocative direction, incentives that are strengthened by this deal. We should offer them that chance. We should give them the opportunity."

karynnj

(59,504 posts)
23. no it was to prevent them from getting a nuclear weapon
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 08:57 AM
Feb 2016

Which they per Netanyahu himself were about 3 months from doing. Now, they are a year and subject to intense monitoring.

Unless what you really preferred was a war with them, it is obvious that we .. and Israel .. are better off with it.

karynnj

(59,504 posts)
25. no valid comparison, thanks to the careful work of Moniz
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 10:13 AM
Feb 2016

As people pointed out, the Iran deal is far more extensive and detailed. The NK agreement had no real monitoring. The Iranian deal included monitoring the entire process from mining uranium on. Secretary Moniz was an MIT professor of nuclear physics. That he and Kerry, a long time friend, worked hand in hand to craft this made it far more comprehensive than expected.

You can find quotes that Israel believes Iran will abide by the agreement at least for a decade. It seems their opposition is based on Iran getting more power in the region.

 

Bradical79

(4,490 posts)
27. I'm not sure what you're advocating.
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 12:07 PM
Feb 2016

Our government thought they were pursuing nukes so we installed sanctions until an agreement was worked out to curb that possibility. Wasn't that the goal?

 

7962

(11,841 posts)
29. The result will be more countries in the ME getting nukes.
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 03:50 PM
Feb 2016

And we knew that from the start. The Saudis & others said from the start that they would "have" to arm themselves. We'll see if they're serious. And Iran still never admitted that they even had a weapons program.
I doubt they will go more than a year or two at the most before they get caught cheating.

Hopefully I'm wrong, that would be fine.

 

Bradical79

(4,490 posts)
30. If they cheat, they cheat
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 05:43 PM
Feb 2016

I don't see how the deal makes them more likely to get nukes. Worst case scenario I see is that they cheat, and we're back to square one. If you assume whatever deal they make isn't going to work, you are pretty much just left with pre-emptive war.

LeftishBrit

(41,208 posts)
18. A lot of this seems based on internal politics: far-righties trying to position themselves against
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 07:42 PM
Feb 2016

comparative moderates.

Regardless, I don't appreciate them making death threats to any of my fellow-citizens (or anyone if it comes to that).

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Iranian media outlets add...