Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 11:23 PM Feb 2016

Gun background check bill squeezes through Oregon House

Source: Oregon Live

SALEM — Legislation that would limit but still allow gun sales when background checks take longer than expected barely cleared the Oregon House on Monday.

Right now, Oregon gun-buyers can obtain firearms by default if a background check takes more than three days — a provision modeled after federal law. House Bill 4147, approved on a 31-28 vote, would extend that wait to 10 business days.

The bill emerged after a mass shooting at a Charleston, S.C., church that left nine people dead. The suspected gunman, federal authorities found, was allowed to purchase his weapon after errors pushed his background check past the three-day window.

snip

Democrats cast HB 4147 as a modest, practical step toward keeping more guns away from people whom society has decided shouldn't have them — people including domestic violence abusers and other would-be mass shooters.

Read more: http://www.oregonlive.com/politics/index.ssf/2016/02/gun_background_check_bill_sque.html#incart_std



Well, this is a start.

Crosses my fingers that it passes the senate.
21 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Gun background check bill squeezes through Oregon House (Original Post) passiveporcupine Feb 2016 OP
I'm ok with this bill TeddyR Feb 2016 #1
Already have Old Codger Feb 2016 #2
for me, closing all the gun law loopholes is a good start. passiveporcupine Feb 2016 #3
This doesn't affect the "gun show loophole" at all Recursion Feb 2016 #8
Oh I know. That's on my list. passiveporcupine Feb 2016 #9
it's not going to do anything mgmaggiemg Feb 2016 #4
That's quite a talent you have! passiveporcupine Feb 2016 #5
sheriff's quoted in the paper mgmaggiemg Feb 2016 #6
While there are some sheriffs in Oregon who will not obey the law passiveporcupine Feb 2016 #7
Oregon sheriffs also famously don't aid the DEA on marijuana Recursion Feb 2016 #11
Sheriff's are county employees elected by the people of their county, GGJohn Feb 2016 #14
Not sure what you are saying there passiveporcupine Feb 2016 #16
Until that get caught doing what? GGJohn Feb 2016 #12
their justification is lack of funding mgmaggiemg Feb 2016 #13
Link? GGJohn Feb 2016 #10
register guard and oregonian mgmaggiemg Feb 2016 #15
Maybe state background checks, but FFL dealers have to perform federal background checks GGJohn Feb 2016 #17
Good for them. nt Jitter65 Feb 2016 #18
K&R! stonecutter357 Feb 2016 #19
Good news. Thanks. n/t Judi Lynn Feb 2016 #20
Why bother fixing the broken background check system Taitertots Feb 2016 #21
 

TeddyR

(2,493 posts)
1. I'm ok with this bill
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 11:27 PM
Feb 2016

But wonder (based on your "this is a start" comment) what the ultimate goal should be.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
3. for me, closing all the gun law loopholes is a good start.
Mon Feb 22, 2016, 11:38 PM
Feb 2016

This doesn't completely close this one, but it helps.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
8. This doesn't affect the "gun show loophole" at all
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 12:25 AM
Feb 2016

I really hate that name (it has absolutely nothing to do with gun shows), but this doesn't do anything about sales by people who aren't licensed dealers; the "loophole" is that if I'm selling my shotgun at a yard sale (or a classified ad, or the Internet, or at a gun show) I'm not allowed (let alone required) to use the Federal background check system.

mgmaggiemg

(869 posts)
4. it's not going to do anything
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 12:03 AM
Feb 2016

sheriffs refusing to do background checks no funding...so gun dealers shop owners will sell guns anyway without the background checks

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
7. While there are some sheriffs in Oregon who will not obey the law
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 12:25 AM
Feb 2016

Until they get caught anyway...That doesn't represent the whole state. And I bet that would be true in almost any state that has passed new gun control laws. It's going to take a long time of dragging people kicking and screaming into the future to see changes implemented. That doesn't mean it won't happen eventually.

We have a new Governor now on our side and I'm so glad. Oregon has a lot of conservative gun thumpers. It won't be an easy state to evolve. But Oregon also has a lot of liberals and we won't stop fighting for change.

Recursion

(56,582 posts)
11. Oregon sheriffs also famously don't aid the DEA on marijuana
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 12:28 AM
Feb 2016

That's always a dangerous road to go down.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
14. Sheriff's are county employees elected by the people of their county,
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 12:34 AM
Feb 2016

they don't have to help federal agents enforce federal laws, nor do they have to provide county assest, like jail cells, manpower, etc, what they can't do is actively interfere with the agents.

passiveporcupine

(8,175 posts)
16. Not sure what you are saying there
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 12:39 AM
Feb 2016

I know the DEA is still trying to eradicate pot grows in Oregon, in spite of it being legalized here...but what are you saying about Sheriffs? If they are not working with the DEA, I think that's a good thing. We want legalized pot here.

But...this is a thread about guns, not pot.

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
12. Until that get caught doing what?
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 12:31 AM
Feb 2016

You do realize that Sheriff's are elected by the people of their county, Sheriff's have wide latitude on how they enforce the law in their counties, if they don't want to enforce those laws, they will refuse to do so and there's not a whole lot that can be done to them.

mgmaggiemg

(869 posts)
13. their justification is lack of funding
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 12:32 AM
Feb 2016

so they say they won't do it bill doesn't go far enough it should just be you must pass a background check it must go through and be approved before a sale...it still leaves it all open for the gun shop/dealer to be straw purchaser to essentially have the paperwork in and not processed is legal...this is how the Ame tragedy in s carolina happened; dylann roof did not pass a background check tho the fbi and gun shop said he did...and a family member of the ame tragedy testified about this in oregon legislature over this bill ....and STILL they left a loophole in....it's got to come from the top down...from the feds...

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
10. Link?
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 12:27 AM
Feb 2016

Because an FFL dealer has to, by federal law, perform a background check on each and every firearm purchase, no exceptions, ATF will come down hard on any dealer who fails to do so.

mgmaggiemg

(869 posts)
15. register guard and oregonian
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 12:36 AM
Feb 2016

if you go back in their archives...there will be articles about Sheriffs stating that certain counties are refusing to do the background checks....

GGJohn

(9,951 posts)
17. Maybe state background checks, but FFL dealers have to perform federal background checks
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 12:53 AM
Feb 2016

otherwise, they'll find themselves in a world of hurt from the ATF.

 

Taitertots

(7,745 posts)
21. Why bother fixing the broken background check system
Tue Feb 23, 2016, 04:12 PM
Feb 2016

When you can just expand the waiting period and ignore all the people who fail.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Gun background check bill...