Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 07:52 PM Feb 2016

Conservatives to Target Clinton Aides After Last E-Mail Drop

Source: Bloomberg

February 29, 2016 — 6:22 PM EST

The State Department released the final batch of e-mails Hillary Clinton kept on a private server while secretary of state, ending months of piecemeal disclosure that has frustrated the Democratic presidential candidate’s campaign and subjected it to criticism from both sides of the aisle.

--clip
The release ends one probe into the Democratic front-runner’s time as the nation’s top diplomat as other efforts to uncover wrongdoing are just beginning. Conservatives, who have spent months or even years investigating Clinton, as they did under her husband’s presidency, are now targeting her small circle of aides.

Using federal disclosure laws and the power of congressional inquiry, critics are setting sights on aides like Huma Abedin and onetime chief of staff Cheryl Mills, who have worked for Clinton for years and now serve in a key roles, and even daughter Chelsea Clinton. The focus may lead to evidence becoming public as the presidential race heats up, potentially landing the parties in court or stoking congressional probes, the critics say.

Brian Fallon, a spokesman for Clinton, called the myriad investigations into former aides and campaign officials “nothing more than fishing expeditions by right-wing groups that have devoted themselves to attacking the Clintons for decades.”

Read more: http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-02-29/conservatives-to-target-clinton-aides-after-final-e-mail-release

12 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies

peacebird

(14,195 posts)
2. CBS news says that one unclassifies email was withheld on request of a law enforcement agency....
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 07:59 PM
Feb 2016

"The State Department said that although there were no additional "top secret" upgrades in today's release, two emails had to be withheld. One was an exchange with President Obama, which is sealed until a later date under rules governing presidential records, and the other was an unclassified message that was withheld at the request of a law enforcement agency. The State Department would not comment further on the content of that message.

Meanwhile, the State Department has said in recent weeks that it is conducting an investigation to see if any of those emails should have been marked as classified and if anyone should be held accountable for mishandling sensitive information.

The FBI is also conducting an investigation into how sensitive information was handled. It's unclear if the Justice Department will bring charges, but nonetheless it is a possible threat that looms over her campaign."

Response to datguy_6 (Reply #1)

LiberalArkie

(15,728 posts)
3. Look at how an investigation into a little known governor of a small state helped him.
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 08:02 PM
Feb 2016

So things like Whitewater really get your name out there.

 

Trust Buster

(7,299 posts)
4. Ken Starr, a staunch Republican, spent years and millions of taxpayer dollars
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 09:09 PM
Feb 2016

in his role as Independent counsel investigating issues like the one you raised and found nothing. The only thing that's different this time is that Bernie's supporters have joined in the decades long witch hunt. Very sad IMO.

 

Duval

(4,280 posts)
5. Isn't it better to get it out now, rather than if/when she's the nominee?
Mon Feb 29, 2016, 09:21 PM
Feb 2016

That would certainly guarantee a Republican presidency. And I don't call this a witch hunt. It has the potential to be very serious.

karynnj

(59,504 posts)
8. The first NYT article that really considered it a scandal was in September 1992
Tue Mar 1, 2016, 12:15 AM
Mar 2016

Earlier, there was a mention that they lost money in the Whitewater corporation that was written in March 1992. Clearly it is wrong to claim that it "got his name out there".

(The NYT broke the story in 1992)

Response to Herman4747 (Reply #9)

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Conservatives to Target C...