Clinton bashes Trump at AIPAC for 'neutral' stance on Israel
Source: The Jerusalem Post
Washington: Donald J. Trump has "no business" being president of the United States if he is neutral on the issue of Palestinian terrorism, Hillary Rodham Clinton said on Monday, in an aggressive and concerted attack against the GOP frontrunner at the American Israel Public Affairs Committee's annual policy conference.
Clinton, likely the Democratic presidential nominee, appealed to the liberal democratic inclinations of 18,000 pro-Israel activists gathered here, targeting Trump's "bigotry" and "bullying" while underscoring the need for steady-handed leadership in a world full of perils.
"America can't ever be neutral when it comes to Israel's security or survival," Clinton said. "Some things aren't negotiable."
Clinton, former first lady, senator from New York and secretary of state, recounted her experience with victims of Palestinian attacks. The US cannot be neutral on the issue, she said, because "in Israel's story, we see our own, and the stories of all people who struggled for freedom and self-determination."
Read more: http://www.jpost.com/US-Elections/WATCH-LIVE-Hillary-Clinton-addresses-AIPAC-in-Washington-DC-448659
Interesting that Secretary Clinton, Governor Kasich, Senator Cruz, and Donald Trump are addressing this conference, along with Congressional leaders from both parties.
One wonders why Senator Sanders can't be bothered to attend?
RepubliCON-Watch
(559 posts)The fact that you are sooo willing to abandon the millions of Palestinians who were kicked out of their home-land, oppressed and killed ruthlessly---PISSES ME OFF!!! I don't want a president who doesn't give two $#@%s about human rights for everyone!
stonecutter357
(12,697 posts)cpwm17
(3,829 posts)Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)riversedge
(70,273 posts)Elmer S. E. Dump
(5,751 posts)stonecutter357
(12,697 posts)leftynyc
(26,060 posts)at your cartoon version of history. They were offered a state and went to war instead. Now they want a do-over. Several of them since they continue the violence to this day. And elect terrorists as leaders. But you keep blaming Israel for all the problems. That's bound to help them get them what they want.
cpwm17
(3,829 posts)That is a lie.
maxsolomon
(33,360 posts)Sanders doesn't need to prove his obeisance to AIPAC.
bigworld
(1,807 posts)You can't get more pro-Israel than that.
George II
(67,782 posts)bigworld
(1,807 posts)The right wing nuttery is relatively recent.
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)dragonfly301
(399 posts)karynnj
(59,504 posts)- not the Israel of Netanyahu and the even more right wing faction ... many of whom actually came from Russia in the 1980s.
PeteSelman
(1,508 posts)Let's see if he sticks to his guns. I'm not surprised to see everyone else pandering.
HassleCat
(6,409 posts)The United States was founded as a religious nation? The US actively discriminates against religious minorities? In which state do we send in the military to destroy the houses of some people so that Real Americans can build there? (If you told me we knock down Mexican neighborhoods to build resorts in Texas, I might believe you.) Do Baptists need special permission to travel from Alabama to Mississippi?
I do agree we share some significant similarities with Israel. We like to attack Muslim countries. Specifically, we both like to antagonize Iran. So maybe she's right.
oberliner
(58,724 posts)I would also point out that Israel was not founded as a religious nation, but as a secular one. It's actually one of the only secular countries in the region.
former9thward
(32,064 posts)All of its wars have been defensive wars. Antagonize Iran? The Iran who has repeatably has said it is going to destroy Israel.
William Seger
(10,779 posts)... but why just for Israelis? I fully support Israel's right and need for self-defense, but Israel's apartheid policies and illegal settlements must stop.
bigworld
(1,807 posts)every time.
George II
(67,782 posts)6chars
(3,967 posts)Correctly analyzes a number of current issues.
markj757
(194 posts)that I can't stand that I'm going to vote for her. This kiss Israel's ass at any cost type propaganda at the cost of Palestinian humiliation and oppression makes me sick to my stomach.
Response to George II (Original post)
Post removed
geek tragedy
(68,868 posts)thesquanderer
(11,990 posts)I assume you did not mean to imply that Sanders would not be friendly to Israel. While he might not be so enamored of the right wing government of Netanyahu, with his being a Jew who lost relatives in the holocaust, I don't think there would be many in the Jewish community who would doubt his commitment to Israel's security. To that extent, I don't think he has to establish his cred to anyone.
Anyway, one can wonder, or one can find out.
from http://www.politico.com/blogs/2016-dem-primary-live-updates-and-results/2016/03/bernie-sanders-not-attend-aipac-israel-220973
Sanders promised to send over a copy of the speech he would have given had he been able to speak, and asked for it to be distributed to members.
MisterP
(23,730 posts)DonCoquixote
(13,616 posts)I will just chalk this up to the proverbial broken clock being right twice a day.
Purveyor
(29,876 posts)stupidicus
(2,570 posts)your support for him is noted
NettheYahoo and your candidate are like two peas in a pod, no?
George II
(67,782 posts)...Clinton's comments about him.
Sanders didn't "politely avoid" AIPAC, he dodged them.
maxsolomon
(33,360 posts)how many other Socialist Jews spoke? AIPAC would rather get smoke blown up their ass by Fundy Christians like Cruz, who want the Rapture already and think the Anti-Christ will be a Jew.
Sanders knows that AIPAC doesn't pull much weight with Democratic primary voters. it's a waste of his limited time.
stupidicus
(2,570 posts)it appears that you also share HC's rightwingerhood as well on this issue. http://americablog.com/2016/03/clinton-plants-flag-trumps-right-israel.html
I can't wait until the day arrives that such is no longer acceptable as "dem" behavior.
George II
(67,782 posts)....totally incorrect assumptions.
stupidicus
(2,570 posts)when you assume and make the case you did about Bernie's absence?
The simple and inarguable fact of the matter is that you support her povs that are to the right of the donalds on Israel, and denounce Bernie for not participating in the warmongers lovefest.
And of course as is the case with virtually all of her supporters, that old adage about how "we are judged by the company we keep" is applied only to rightwingers.
George II
(67,782 posts)"One wonders why Senator Sanders can't be bothered to attend?"
SO do you often "wonder" about things you already have an incontrovertible answer to?
meanwhile, your guilt by way of 2 degrees of separation leaves one "wondering" what it is about warmongers is it that you find so attractive, or in the alternative, a trifling thing compared to Bernie not playing with those bad boys and girls, since you give that no consideration at all while implying something what, untoward on Bernie's part for not participating http://www.dailykos.com/stories/2016/2/5/1480455/-Endorsed-by-all-the-best-war-criminals-and-scumbag-billionaires
George II
(67,782 posts)You've been around a while, you know the drill.
Fact remains, all of this negative stuff about Clinton only gains her votes, it doesn't lose votes for her. And she will win the nomination AND the Presidency.
stupidicus
(2,570 posts)if that were the case, BS would have zero support by now, and she'd have all the marbles.
Dems to Win
(2,161 posts)While America is supporting the Saudis in their devastation of Yemen, including actual genocide by starvation of the Yemeni population.
Reading that article left me cold and dismayed.
I want a president of the US, solely dedicated to the best interest of the USA. Of course this recognizes that America does well when the entire world is doing well. But Hillary's unabashed unconditional support of Israel is not what I want in my president.
It sounds like Trump was the one who was brave and rational at AIPAC. This is insane. Makes me wanna holler.
farleftlib
(2,125 posts)and no matter how far Netanyahu goes, she moves right along with him. The illegal settlements? No problem. Denial of Palestinians' rights? What rights? She will have even more blood on her hands than now, and that's scary.
LiberalLovinLug
(14,175 posts)You got to choose a side and go to war!!!!! Get with the program.
George II
(67,782 posts)LiberalLovinLug
(14,175 posts)It is what I surmised from her statements,
"America can't ever be neutral when it comes to Israel's security"
along with:
"Donald J. Trump has "no business" being president of the United States if he is neutral on the issue of Palestinian terrorism"
Its clear she is criticizing Trump for not saber rattling enough for one side over the other, and it this case, for this particular audience, it is backing the Apartheid Israeli State over the naughty uppity Palestinians.
In fact the only way to achieve peace in the region is to enter with a neutral stance and open mind. Not pandering to the hawks on one side. Decades of war in Ireland only ended when they stopped the demonization of the oppressed side for the actions of the most extreme and actually attempted to back up, listen to concerns, and re-approach it from a more neutral stance.
George II
(67,782 posts)LiberalLovinLug
(14,175 posts)I even actually quoted her for you this time. Seems pretty clear to me. She is critical of Trump for being neutral. What did I miss?
George II
(67,782 posts)riversedge
(70,273 posts)GOLGO 13
(1,681 posts)donna123
(182 posts)Trump is also not immune. Netanyahu and his ilk have been so disrespectful to Obama and to the US in general. If the US doesn't do everything Israel wants, they spit on us. WTF. WHY is this not negotiable? Not that I want us to negotiate or try to broker any Israel-Palestinian deal because it won't work and Israel doesn't want the US to broker any deal, they just want us to keep funneling money and support while they do whatever they want. I believe Israel has every right to defend itself, the Palestinians are so extreme and nutty, but I do not care for Israel leading the US by the nose. If I were Jewish, I would be invested in Israel, yes, but I am not and most of the country is not, just like most of the country are not of Chinese descent and invested in China or invested in Ireland or whatever other country. Why is Israel more special than Burma or Honduras or Nepal. Do presidential candidates speak to any other special interest group like this? I honestly do not know, if they do, I would like to know, otherwise, it just looks like Israel having this stranglehold on pretty much all politicians in the US.