FCC approves plan to expand U.S. low-income subsidy to Internet use
Source: Reuters
The Federal Communications Commission on Thursday approved a proposal to expand a telephone subsidy for low-income Americans to include Internet access, after a deal to cap the cost of the plan collapsed.
The commission voted 3-2 to approve a proposal by FCC Chairman Tom Wheeler, unveiled earlier this month, to expand the $9.25 monthly mobile phone subsidy to include broadband Internet access. The agency's three Democrats voted yea and its two Republicans nay.
Republicans have pushed for a budget cap for the $1.5 billion annual program, called Lifeline, which has helped lower-income Americans get access to telecommunications technologies since 1985. There is currently no cap.
FCC Commissioner Ajit Pai, a Republican, said Democratic Commissioner Mignon Clyburn had signed onto a deal with Republicans earlier in the day after intensive negotiations, only to change her decision.
Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-fcc-subsidy-idUSKCN0WX24T
phazed0
(745 posts)$9.25 a month or $111/yr isn't going to do much in the way of helping.. maybe I'm wrong. My cell bill is ~$75/mo per line and my internet is around the same.
My question would be, if you're so poor you need a $9.25/mo subsidy, wtf are you paying $65/mo for a phone?
I would rather see $1.5 Billion annually go to something better like, oh I dunno, breaking up communication monopolies and curbing extreme price fixing and outrageous prices. Where most of the world pays "dirt-cheap" prices for stellar services, the US pays MORE for less... Imagine if high speed internet was $30-$50/mo or a cell phone for the same... more savings than $9.25.
And no, I could care less about hurting company business: Record profits, highest prices, worst service.
passiveporcupine
(8,175 posts)It would be better to work on breaking up monopolies and bringing costs down for everyone.
IDemo
(16,926 posts)for low income customers. If this additional subsidy can be applied, that would leave it at 70 cents monthly (plus a modem rental or purchase). You do have to reapply each year to qualify.
http://www.centurylink.com/home/internetbasics/?rid=internetbasics
riversedge
(70,362 posts)is fixed at about $11,000. Lots of elderly are in he same boat--esp. elderly woman who typically did not work full time in their early years and have very little Soc Security checks
Saving about 10.00 a month will help her a lot. I am glad to finally see this.
awoke_in_2003
(34,582 posts)to get a job without internet access. Everyone wants you to apply online
seabeckind
(1,957 posts)Awesome!
The ACA model applied to communications. Heaven forbid we should do anything to cut into profits.
Instead we'll give some folks a coupon (paid for by the folks who are already being gouged) so they can get to be gouged, less the 5% discount.
Thanks a lot.
How about making communications infrastructure a utility? One that includes a base level of service with add-on if you want them.
It might just cause a little INNO-FUKIN-VATION!!!
Recursion
(56,582 posts)(And, yes, I reversed the cliche on purpose.)
You're so worked up over the fact that someone, somewhere, is making a profit on this, that you can't bring yourself to support a program that gives phone access (and, soon, internet access) to millions of Americans.
seabeckind
(1,957 posts)You've heard of those. Was quite rage before reagan privatized everything. Hel, we got electricity, phone, water, sewage.
Basically how it works is the the municipality owns the backbone. You know there are actually places in the country where cable company leases bandwidth from the people-owned infrastructure?
In fact we have a city in the US that has had an amazing boom in their economy by doing a municipal backbone. Maybe you heard of it -- Chatanooga. When the republicans introduced a bill to make it illegal for a municipality to offer such a thing, it was because of this.
Ultra-high-speed broadband available to all 170,000 customers for $299 per month
The city-owned utility announced today that it is now offering 10 gigabit broadband to any of EPB's 170,000 customers. The 10 Gig service will be offered to any residential customer for $299 per month, compared with the $69.99 for EPB's current single gig service.
(snip)
Comcast's 2 Gig service, called Gigabit Pro, is being offered initially for $159 a month, or just over half the usual $299 price. Comcast's Gigabit Pro is available only to customers within one-third of a mile of Comcast's fiber network and consumers must pay hookup fees and sign a contract.
http://www.timesfreepress.com/news/local/story/2015/oct/15/chattanooga-becomes-first-10-gigabit-city-world/330691/
jwirr
(39,215 posts)Educationally.