Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

brooklynite

(94,665 posts)
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 09:52 AM Apr 2016

Amtrak train strikes backhoe, derails with 340-plus on board

Source: CNN

(CNN)An Amtrak passenger train derailed Sunday morning south of Philadelphia while en route from New York to Savannah, Georgia, the company said in a statement.

The train struck a backhoe that was on the tracks, Amtrak said.

About 341 passengers and seven crew members were on board. Amtrak said some of those on board were being treated for injuries but did not specify how many.

The company is suspended service between New York and Philadelphia.

Read more: http://www.cnn.com/2016/04/03/us/philadelphia-amtrak-derailment/index.html

29 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Amtrak train strikes backhoe, derails with 340-plus on board (Original Post) brooklynite Apr 2016 OP
What a waste metroins Apr 2016 #1
Whoa there big fella rjsquirrel Apr 2016 #3
In my opinion metroins Apr 2016 #5
Not saying you aren't rjsquirrel Apr 2016 #6
We'll see how it plays out. metroins Apr 2016 #8
Logic much? "It's not like a a suicide." So you think suicides are not intentional? Gosh Bernardo de La Paz Apr 2016 #7
I'm entitled to my opinion metroins Apr 2016 #9
Of course you are... Chan790 Apr 2016 #21
You may know trains metroins Apr 2016 #22
WTF is this shit right here. Brickbat Apr 2016 #11
"No reason for this to happen." Unless of course it broke down while crossing the tracks. cstanleytech Apr 2016 #14
Well you were wrong rjsquirrel Apr 2016 #17
Sometimes you're wrong metroins Apr 2016 #19
UPDATE: 2 reported dead after Amtrak train derails in Chester brooklynite Apr 2016 #2
Construction/Demolition is rampant and unregulated here in Philly. onehandle Apr 2016 #4
Unfortunately no rjsquirrel Apr 2016 #18
Common at RR crossings rickford66 Apr 2016 #10
Had a idiot try to beat a Amtrak whistler162 Apr 2016 #12
It could also be a simple case of mechanical failure of the backhoe 5 to 10 minutes before the train cstanleytech Apr 2016 #15
Why so often though? rickford66 Apr 2016 #16
Evidently the two dead were Amtrak employees doing construction work? Blue_Tires Apr 2016 #20
UPDATE: More than 30 taken to hospitals after Amtrak crash south of Philadelphia brooklynite Apr 2016 #13
Reuters: Maintenance workers were on wrong track before Amtrak crash - CNN Eugene Apr 2016 #23
they can't send a low voltage along tracks & when blockedspan the 2 rails with some kind of warning? Sunlei Apr 2016 #24
It's my understanding that it takes Aerows Apr 2016 #25
Oh yeah..... whistler162 Apr 2016 #26
That's what I thought. Aerows Apr 2016 #27
From your link Aerows Apr 2016 #28
I grew up in a Railroad town in the '70's Nac Mac Feegle Apr 2016 #29

metroins

(2,550 posts)
1. What a waste
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 09:53 AM
Apr 2016

Last edited Sun Apr 3, 2016, 10:57 AM - Edit history (1)

No reason for this to happen.

Waste of time, resources and injuries on a completely preventable incident.

That sounds intentional to me.

Looks like the two dead are construction workers.

 

rjsquirrel

(4,762 posts)
3. Whoa there big fella
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 09:56 AM
Apr 2016

That is quite a leap. Negligent and stupid and wasteful yes.

Who you're implying is an act of terrorism.

metroins

(2,550 posts)
5. In my opinion
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 10:14 AM
Apr 2016

It sounds intentional if a backhoe was on the tracks.

It's not like a car stalled or a suicide.

It's my opinion and I'm entitled to it. We will see how it plays out but it's not common to have a 7 ton backhoe on train tracks.

 

rjsquirrel

(4,762 posts)
6. Not saying you aren't
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 10:17 AM
Apr 2016

Just haven't yet heard any reason to believe it's a zebra and not a horse whose hooves I hear.

Shit getting left on tracks accidentally (negligently by definition) happens all the time. People intentionally causing derailments by doing that happens rarely.

metroins

(2,550 posts)
8. We'll see how it plays out.
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 10:22 AM
Apr 2016

I don't see backhoes on train tracks very often.

Looks like the dead 2 were construction workers on the backhoe.

Bernardo de La Paz

(49,027 posts)
7. Logic much? "It's not like a a suicide." So you think suicides are not intentional? Gosh
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 10:21 AM
Apr 2016

You think backhoes never stall?

You think backhoes never cross tracks?

 

Chan790

(20,176 posts)
21. Of course you are...
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 09:36 PM
Apr 2016

and those of us that know something about trains, like that backhoes (and other heavy machinery) are on and near tracks frequently because tracks require near-constant maintenance (which is nearly impossible to do without heavy machinery when you're talking about 4T 120' rail-segment and 95lb. concrete cross-ties), especially on major corridors like Amtrak's Northeast Regional Lines...are entitled to think maybe your opinion is ill-informed.

There is a not-fine line between failure of safety procedures and acts of intent.

metroins

(2,550 posts)
22. You may know trains
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 09:53 PM
Apr 2016

I know backhoes. I worked and operated them for 4 years roughly 6 years ago.

Backhoes don't stall once their started unless under stress.

But honestly, this conversation doesn't matter. I enjoy speculating, I enjoy trying to predict and my opinion doesn't matter.

So I hope you have a good night, sometimes I'm wrong. I don't mind admitting it, I posted what I thought at the time.

 

rjsquirrel

(4,762 posts)
17. Well you were wrong
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 05:06 PM
Apr 2016

It was an Amtrak maintenance crew operating the backhoe.

Once again proving the value of fevered speculation after a disaster.

metroins

(2,550 posts)
19. Sometimes you're wrong
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 07:35 PM
Apr 2016

I believe in speculation if there's no consequences.

I'm lying in my bed 1800 miles away.

My opinion literally does not matter, but I'm free to put it out there.

brooklynite

(94,665 posts)
2. UPDATE: 2 reported dead after Amtrak train derails in Chester
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 09:56 AM
Apr 2016
Amtrak has suspended service on the Northeast Corridor after an Amtrak train derailed during an accident in Chester.

Officials say Amtrak Train 89, operating from New York to Savannah, Ga., struck a backhoe that was on the tracks at approximately 7:53 a.m. Sunday morning near Booth St. in Chester, causing the lead engine of the train to derail.

6 ABC and others are reporting that two have died as a result of the incident, but Amtrak has only confirmed that some passengers are being treated for injuries.

Read more at http://www.philly.com/philly/blogs/real-time/2-reported-dead-after-Amtrak-train-derails-in-Chester.html

onehandle

(51,122 posts)
4. Construction/Demolition is rampant and unregulated here in Philly.
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 10:09 AM
Apr 2016

My guess is that it was an improperly trained operator running the backhoe.

90% of the construction workers here seem to be from New Jersey, so I would put some of the blame on Christie's deregulation of everything. But also, Philly needs to require certifications, increase construction fees, and tax the fuck out of developers.

Philly is nothing but closed sidewalks and gaping holes in the ground.

But I digress...

Prayers for the people on the train and their families. I've been on that train many times. It could have been us.

FUND AMTRAK, REPUBLICANS!

rickford66

(5,526 posts)
10. Common at RR crossings
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 10:34 AM
Apr 2016

I've seen people trying to beat the train as have many other people. I've also wondered why so many vehicles stall on the tracks. Do the drivers get nervous, stall the vehicle and maybe flood it?

cstanleytech

(26,306 posts)
15. It could also be a simple case of mechanical failure of the backhoe 5 to 10 minutes before the train
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 12:34 PM
Apr 2016

was there and the drivers were simply unable to get it off the tracks in time.

Blue_Tires

(55,445 posts)
20. Evidently the two dead were Amtrak employees doing construction work?
Sun Apr 3, 2016, 08:32 PM
Apr 2016

Which makes it all the more confusing...

Eugene

(61,928 posts)
23. Reuters: Maintenance workers were on wrong track before Amtrak crash - CNN
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 11:00 AM
Apr 2016

Source: Reuters

Maintenance workers were on wrong track before Amtrak crash - CNN

Source: Reuters - Mon, 4 Apr 2016 14:50 GMT
Author: Reuters

(Adds CNN report that workers were on the wrong track)

By Barbara Goldberg

NEW YORK, April 4 (Reuters) - Maintenance workers were mistakenly on the wrong track when an Amtrak passenger train struck a large piece of railway equipment on Sunday near Philadelphia and killed two people, according to CNN.

The network cited an unnamed source in reporting that the train hit the crew after a "colossal" error left them on an active track.

Investigators on Monday from the National Transportation Safety Board were analyzing an event data recorder and video recordings recovered after the front of the train went off the tracks in Chester, Pennsylvania, about 15 miles (25 km) southwest of Philadelphia.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]


Read more: http://news.trust.org/item/20160404145354-pjnde

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
24. they can't send a low voltage along tracks & when blockedspan the 2 rails with some kind of warning?
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 11:12 AM
Apr 2016

I mean a very low voltage like my land line has where old phone rings even if power is off?

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
25. It's my understanding that it takes
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 03:19 PM
Apr 2016

quite a distance to stop a train. You have a good idea, though, and if prevents even one of these collisions it is worth looking into.

 

whistler162

(11,155 posts)
26. Oh yeah.....
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 07:27 PM
Apr 2016
http://crpit.com/confpapers/CRPITV3Barney.pdf

http://cs.trains.com/trn/f/111/t/72641.aspx

"A full service application will stop a loaded coal train going 50mph on flat ground in about 1.5 miles; an emergency application will stop it in about half of that distance.

Factors affecting the stopping distance are: temperature, grade (uphill or downhill), dynamic brakes (or the lack thereof), ice/snow accumulated in brake rigging, and to a lesser extent the condition of the rail.

A coal train (or any unit train) can usually be put directly into emergency without much risk of derailment due to all the freight cars are of equal length and weight. A manifest train with mixed loads and empties distributed at random needs much more care on how quickly the brakes are applied. A poorly blocked train (empties in front / loads on the rear) require muck more delicate applications of brakes (either dynamic or air) due to the likelyhood of undesireable slack action.

A suburban train can stop (under ideal conditions) from 70mph in about 1/2 mile."

Just a couple of samples.
 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
27. That's what I thought.
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 07:32 PM
Apr 2016

They are so dang heavy and have so much built up momentum, that they need quite a distance (way more than visibility) to stop. I wouldn't be surprised that despite the advances made in hydraulic braking systems that those figures are generous.

And as you illuminated, poor loading balance would most certainly make some configurations extremely dangerous.

 

Aerows

(39,961 posts)
28. From your link
Mon Apr 4, 2016, 07:38 PM
Apr 2016

"Look at it this way, a loaded coal train can weigh in excess of 15,000 tons. 15,000 tons moving at 50 MPH is alot of energy to arrest. So 2 1/2 miles is not out of line."

I don't doubt that for a second. You aren't stopping a F-150 or even a fully loaded tractor trailer. You are stopping several magnitudes more weight.

Nac Mac Feegle

(971 posts)
29. I grew up in a Railroad town in the '70's
Tue Apr 5, 2016, 03:04 PM
Apr 2016

The 'legend' was that a fully loaded coal train, a mile long, going 60mph, could "Dynamite" (full emergency stop, named for the explosive indicator charges that were put on the rail) in it' own length (one mile). However, this would destroy all the brake pads, put flat spots on all the wheels that would render them unusable, and convert the crew in the way-car (caboose) into strawberry jam on the front wall. This was before the technology advanced that rendered the way-car (caboose) unnecessary.

It was considered something that was to be strictly avoided, unless ABSOLUTELY necessary.


There is a HELL of a lot of weight, going at a sizable speed. That is a &*($ of a lot of energy that has to go somewhere. It ain't gonna be pretty.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Amtrak train strikes back...