Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search
 

Purveyor

(29,876 posts)
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 02:27 AM Apr 2016

Poll: More Than Half Of Voters Wouldn't Back Donald Trump, Ted Cruz, Hillary Clinton

Source: CBS NEWS

By Emily Schultheis CBS News April 18, 2016, 6:22 PM

It's a common phrase in a tough election to say someone's choosing between the "lesser of two evils" when it comes to candidates--and new polling indicates that voters largely see themselves facing that kind of choice in the general election this fall.

Sixty-eight percent of those surveyed said they couldn't see themselves voting for GOP front-runner Donald Trump, according to an NBC/Wall Street Journal poll released Monday evening. For Texas Sen. Ted Cruz, the figure was almost as high: 61 percent said they couldn't see themselves backing him; 58 percent said the same of former secretary of state Hillary Clinton. The figures were slightly lower for Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders (48 percent) and Ohio Gov. John Kasich (47 percent).

Those convictions about not voting for top candidates come from voters' highly negative views of those candidate. Overall, 65 percent of voters have a negative view of Trump, compared with 24 percent who have a positive view -- which NBC notes makes him the least popular presidential candidate in the history of their polls.

Cruz and Clinton are also far underwater when it comes to image: their net favorability ratings are -23 points and -24 points, respectively. For Cruz, 26 percent of voters view him positively, compared with 49 percent who view him negatively; for Clinton, 32 percent view her favorably, compared with 56 percent who view her unfavorably.

Read more: http://www.cbsnews.com/news/poll-more-than-half-of-voters-wouldnt-back-donald-trump-ted-cruz-hillary-clinton/

35 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Poll: More Than Half Of Voters Wouldn't Back Donald Trump, Ted Cruz, Hillary Clinton (Original Post) Purveyor Apr 2016 OP
This message was self-deleted by its author silvershadow Apr 2016 #1
To bad though that the polls are immaterial as far as choosing the winner. nt cstanleytech Apr 2016 #2
Welcome to the end of the Two Party System. leveymg Apr 2016 #3
I was listening to a BBC report yesterday on the way to work Sherman A1 Apr 2016 #9
It happened in the 60s when the Dixicrats became Republicans to oppose civil rights legislation. Nitram Apr 2016 #21
Broken before. Won't be a first. Downwinder Apr 2016 #12
If...Trump is ganged up on at their convention LiberalLovinLug Apr 2016 #32
You have no idea what you're asking for Action_Patrol Apr 2016 #33
Spot on. I know that more than half of my household won't support HRC. nt silvershadow Apr 2016 #4
I'm sure all those members who were saying we must vote for Hillary because SCOTUS are now ... Scuba Apr 2016 #5
If he's the nominee? Absolutely. Action_Patrol Apr 2016 #34
so far bernie sanders cant even beat hillary, being behind by millions of votes and all nt msongs Apr 2016 #6
Look... a squirrel ! FailureToCommunicate Apr 2016 #13
a mouse! crickets! greymouse Apr 2016 #15
Yeah because of stupid closed primaries and he does better in a general pinebox Apr 2016 #17
Here in TN it is a practice in futility to vote Democratic. fasttense Apr 2016 #31
Clinton's viability depends on a disastrous republican candidate fbc Apr 2016 #7
even then greymouse Apr 2016 #16
I ran into a typically "infromed" voter who said they didn't like ANY of them.... Spitfire of ATJ Apr 2016 #8
This election is like Rafale Apr 2016 #10
Or you could choose Bernie--disease-free joy! Peace Patriot Apr 2016 #24
I've been told that before...lol Rafale Apr 2016 #35
Kicking nt LiberalElite Apr 2016 #11
Matches with what I hear talking to potential voters. Clinton has So much baggage, rightfully or FailureToCommunicate Apr 2016 #14
I'm with the 56% who see her as unfavorble. Unfavorable is putting it mildly. Cobalt Violet Apr 2016 #18
Emily Schultheis is a twit. LiberalFighter Apr 2016 #19
Now there's an intelligent post. KPN Apr 2016 #22
Gee, thanks DWS zentrum Apr 2016 #20
Ergo the revolution. KPN Apr 2016 #23
Me, too !!!!!!! eom zalinda Apr 2016 #25
Going to vote today zentrum Apr 2016 #29
This is a nasty bit of reporting. Sanders is treated as a footnote!!! Peace Patriot Apr 2016 #26
how can even EdwardBernays Apr 2016 #27
Message auto-removed Name removed Apr 2016 #28
Yep. Jack Rabbit Apr 2016 #30

Response to Purveyor (Original post)

leveymg

(36,418 posts)
3. Welcome to the end of the Two Party System.
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 03:55 AM
Apr 2016

If they break into factions, we likely would too. Maybe it should have happened a long time ago. It would be nice not to have to count on the FBI to prevent having to make the non-choice of Trump or Clinton in November.

Sherman A1

(38,958 posts)
9. I was listening to a BBC report yesterday on the way to work
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 05:04 AM
Apr 2016

and the person interviewed indicated that he thought it would be a re-alignment of the parties which he said happens about every 50 or 60 years if I recall correctly. I don't see the parties dissolving, but this view may be correct that we are seeing a significant change within the parities. We will see.

Nitram

(22,803 posts)
21. It happened in the 60s when the Dixicrats became Republicans to oppose civil rights legislation.
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 10:00 AM
Apr 2016

Families in the South that had always been Democrats decided to become Republicans. It was a major re-alignment.

LiberalLovinLug

(14,174 posts)
32. If...Trump is ganged up on at their convention
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 03:55 PM
Apr 2016

and he decides to go independent and thus splits the Republican vote...

Maybe Bernie should go back to being independent too, and running as such.

A four way race, not only to determine the President, but to also establish the direction of the political parties in the future.

BTW...Bernie would probably win in a landslide, if the trend continues of Clinton support dropping and Sanders climbing.


Action_Patrol

(845 posts)
33. You have no idea what you're asking for
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 05:14 PM
Apr 2016
http://www.theatlantic.com/past/docs/issues/80oct/deadlock.htm

The House of Representatives would decide the President.

No thank you.

I can't wait for primary season to be over.
 

Scuba

(53,475 posts)
5. I'm sure all those members who were saying we must vote for Hillary because SCOTUS are now ...
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 04:16 AM
Apr 2016

... saying we must vote for Bernie because SCOTUS, right?

 

pinebox

(5,761 posts)
17. Yeah because of stupid closed primaries and he does better in a general
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 08:11 AM
Apr 2016

It's a fact. He does. Hillary will lose in a general. Many people will never vote for her.

 

fasttense

(17,301 posts)
31. Here in TN it is a practice in futility to vote Democratic.
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 11:35 AM
Apr 2016

We got those unreliable, secret black box voting machines that can't count accurately. Even if every person in TN voted for a Democrat, the machines would make sure it counted as a win for RepubliCONS. The voting machines are rigged by and for RepubliCONS and have been rigged for years.

 

fbc

(1,668 posts)
7. Clinton's viability depends on a disastrous republican candidate
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 04:59 AM
Apr 2016

She'd get crushed by a McCain or Romney

greymouse

(872 posts)
16. even then
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 07:57 AM
Apr 2016

a lot of Independents, Republicans, and #BernieOrBust people will never vote for her. If it's Clinton vs. any Republican, we may see an interesting Electoral College decision.

 

Spitfire of ATJ

(32,723 posts)
8. I ran into a typically "infromed" voter who said they didn't like ANY of them....
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 05:03 AM
Apr 2016

I asked about Bernie and she said, "All he does is yell."

FailureToCommunicate

(14,014 posts)
14. Matches with what I hear talking to potential voters. Clinton has So much baggage, rightfully or
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 07:51 AM
Apr 2016

not, and folks opinions hardened long ago.

Bernie, ironically, is a "fresh face" AND when people learn more about his positions, they agree, and sound interested in looking deeper into his youth-fired candidacy.

zentrum

(9,865 posts)
20. Gee, thanks DWS
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 09:18 AM
Apr 2016

…for putting the country, the election and the Democratic Party in such jeopardy. What dangerous, egotistical incompetence it's been to insist on a coronation.

I'd really like to know how her supporters think she'll ever get anything done——which is her big selling point. When she is despised by the Repubs (Bernie is not) and when she has half the country totally exhausted and distrustful of the Clintons. She will have an embattled Presidency. How does this help the country? We can't afford another 4 years of Clinton drama.





KPN

(15,646 posts)
23. Ergo the revolution.
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 10:17 AM
Apr 2016

And it's aboiut damned time. Been waiting my whole frigging life for this!

zentrum

(9,865 posts)
29. Going to vote today
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 11:22 AM
Apr 2016

…for Bernie and though voting for Obama was thrilling—this is the happiest voting day of my life. Can't wait!!

Peace Patriot

(24,010 posts)
26. This is a nasty bit of reporting. Sanders is treated as a footnote!!!
Tue Apr 19, 2016, 10:51 AM
Apr 2016

First, the article dismisses a 10% difference as "slightly lower" in unfavorability:

The figures were slightly lower for Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders (48 percent) and Ohio Gov. John Kasich (47 percent).--from the OP (my emphasis)


48% is NOT "slightly lower" than Clinton. It is significantly lower. Indeed, it is the difference between winning and losing the GE.

The article then FAILS TO MENTION SANDERS' FAVORABILITY rating in the following:

Cruz and Clinton are also far underwater when it comes to image: their net favorability ratings are -23 points and -24 points, respectively. For Cruz, 26 percent of voters view him positively, compared with 49 percent who view him negatively; for Clinton, 32 percent view her favorably, compared with 56 percent who view her unfavorably.--from the OP


Where is Sanders in that paragraph? What are they 'black-holing' in that paragraph?

Finally, the article PLACES THIS AT THE END!:

Sanders would defeat Cruz with a much larger margin than Clinton: he'd win by 12 points, 52 percent to 40 percent, according to the poll.--from the OP (my emphasis)


What a piece of shit reporting!

Response to Purveyor (Original post)

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Poll: More Than Half Of V...