Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

MowCowWhoHow III

(2,103 posts)
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 01:00 PM Apr 2016

U.S. Supreme Court rejects Iran bank's bid to avoid payout to attack victims

Source: Reuters

The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday ruled that almost $2 billion in frozen Iranian assets must be turned over to American families of people killed in the 1983 bombing of a U.S. Marine Corps barracks in Beirut and other attacks blamed on Iran.

The court's 6-2 ruling dealt a setback to Iran's central bank, finding that the U.S. Congress did not usurp the authority of American courts by passing a 2012 law stating that the frozen funds should go toward satisfying a $2.65 billion judgment won by the families against Iran in U.S. federal court in 2007.

Bank Markazi had challenged a 2014 ruling by the New York-based 2nd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals that the money, held in a Citibank trust account in New York, should be handed over to the American plaintiffs.

The ruling, written by liberal Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg, said the U.S. Congress did not violate the separation of powers principle enshrined in the U.S. Constitution that gives specific authority to the government's executive, legislative and judicial branches.


Read more: http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-court-iran-idUSKCN0XH1R6

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
U.S. Supreme Court rejects Iran bank's bid to avoid payout to attack victims (Original Post) MowCowWhoHow III Apr 2016 OP
This is a very good decision. Agnosticsherbet Apr 2016 #1
Excellent decision katsy Apr 2016 #2
Great decision leftynyc Apr 2016 #3
That's an interesting composition. Calista241 Apr 2016 #6
Tough case and good decision. Notorious RBG strikes again. nt msanthrope Apr 2016 #4
Excellent iandhr Apr 2016 #5
Great decision! Now, let's apply it to the US. Redwoods Red Apr 2016 #7

Calista241

(5,586 posts)
6. That's an interesting composition.
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 01:49 PM
Apr 2016

The most liberal and most conservative justices were in concurrence, and 2 more centrist judges were in dissent.

Sometimes I'm amazed at how these things turn out.

 

Redwoods Red

(137 posts)
7. Great decision! Now, let's apply it to the US.
Wed Apr 20, 2016, 03:31 PM
Apr 2016

Suits like this could impoverish our military industrial complex.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»U.S. Supreme Court reject...