Supreme Court Backs Arizona Voting Map in Republican Setback
Source: Bloomberg
The U.S. Supreme Court upheld Arizonas state legislative districts, rejecting contentions that the map unconstitutionally dilutes the influence of Republican voters.
The justices Wednesday unanimously said the map, drawn by an independent commission, complies with the Constitutions one person, one vote principle.
A group of Arizona residents contended that the commission actually had partisan motivations and packed white Republicans into a handful of districts to give Democrats an edge.
The high court said there was ample evidence that the commission wasnt driven by partisan motivations but by an effort to comply with the U.S. Voting Rights Act.
Read more: http://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2016-04-20/u-s-high-court-backs-arizona-voting-map-in-republican-setback
rpannier
(24,329 posts)That's gotta hurt
Jackie Wilson Said
(4,176 posts)former9thward
(32,019 posts)Democrats controlled the AZ Commission in the last cycle (2011). They gerrymandered state districts to hurt the Republicans. The SC oked gerrymandering with this decision.
If you are ok with Democratic gerrymandering that is fine but this decision allows Republicans to do it when they control things.
Raster
(20,998 posts)..."were drawn by an independent commission, complies with the Constitutions one person, one vote principle."
FURTHER:
A group of Arizona residents contended that the commission actually had partisan motivations and packed white Republicans into a handful of districts to give Democrats an edge.
The high court said there was ample evidence that the commission wasnt driven by partisan motivations but by an effort to comply with the U.S. Voting Rights Act. (emphasis mine)
<snip>
Conservative groups argued unsuccessfully in that case that the measure should be eligible voters, rather than total population. Had that argument succeeded, it would have marked a transformational change, reducing Hispanic voting clout and shifting some seats to more heavily Republican areas.
former9thward
(32,019 posts)They packed Republicans into districts which allowed Democrats to compete in others. Gerrymandering.
houston16revival
(953 posts)the Court is unanimously signalling that they don't intend to get involved
in every redistricting and gerrymandering challenge
They would rather leave it to the states
Today's ruling kind of ignores 'partisan motivation' and supports the
independent commission
Hard to believe Justices Alito and Thomas would go along with this ruling
egalitegirl
(362 posts)Do you really believe that the Supreme Court has a split along ideological lines? That is a show for the consumption of gullible people and to get them to vote for the establishment candidates of the two parties whenever an insurgent candidate shows up.
houston16revival
(953 posts)I don't believe that either
Coventina
(27,121 posts)Maybe now we can show ourselves to be the "purple" state we really are!!
The wingnuts have been in control for far too long!!
Feeling the Bern
(3,839 posts)We are state of idiotic people that, for the most part, vote against our own best interests because the Republican toads in Maricopa (and by lesser extent Pinal) County control the entire state.
Coventina
(27,121 posts)The idiocy is deep here, yes, but strong Democrats CAN get elected.
And, with this victory, more will!!
former9thward
(32,019 posts)It is now 2016. Where are more Democrats being elected?
CanonRay
(14,104 posts)I thought we got rid of that!