Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Cobalt Violet

(9,905 posts)
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 09:30 AM Apr 2016

Rhode Island closes 66 percent of polling places to cut election costs

Source: Raw Story

The Rhode Island Board of Elections announced this week that two-thirds of the state’s polling places would remain closed for the upcoming primary as a costs savings measure.

According to WPRI, the Board of Elections plans to cut costs by opening only 144 of the state’s 419 polling places for the April 26 primary.

Board of Elections Director Robert Rapoza argued that the state had handled record turnout in 2008 after implementing similar cost savings measures.

But since 2008, the state has reduced the total number of polling places. Meaning that there were 33 more voting locations in 2008 than there will be this year.

Read more: https://www.rawstory.com/2016/04/rhode-island-closes-66-percent-of-polling-places-to-cut-election-costs/



Here we go again.
115 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Rhode Island closes 66 percent of polling places to cut election costs (Original Post) Cobalt Violet Apr 2016 OP
Better call Saul. Buzz Clik Apr 2016 #1
Very Cool laserhaas Apr 2016 #19
Repugs probably. What they did in AZ was a rehearsal to suppress dem votes in the general. brush Apr 2016 #2
I don't think it's an R vs. D thing. Shemp Howard Apr 2016 #26
In AZ the closings were mostly in POC neighborhoods . . . brush Apr 2016 #34
RI's top officials are all D (see my post #30) nt Shemp Howard Apr 2016 #38
They'll keep 'em open next to the nursing homes. mpcamb Apr 2016 #100
Pretty sure Democrats control the Rhode Island government so that won't work Cheese Sandwich Apr 2016 #32
That's a hard one to fathom. brush Apr 2016 #37
It helps Clinton because her voters are disproportionately absentee voters and early voters Cheese Sandwich Apr 2016 #40
I agree that no one wants to stand on long lines on election day, but . . . brush Apr 2016 #44
"Disproportionately" means that absentee and early voters are more likely to vote for Clinton. Cheese Sandwich Apr 2016 #46
"More likely"? That sound like the reason to close two thirds of the polls to you? brush Apr 2016 #57
yeah of course. Anything that makes it harder to vote will help Clinton Cheese Sandwich Apr 2016 #58
I think you're reaching with that one. brush Apr 2016 #59
So clever. And so transparent. Kingofalldems Apr 2016 #90
Few CAN wait in line for hours abelenkpe Apr 2016 #45
It's Rhode Island HillareeeHillaraah Apr 2016 #49
I have never gaspee Apr 2016 #84
If we cannot afford elections then our politicians priorities are screwed up, but then we Dustlawyer Apr 2016 #54
Oh, joy. MBS Apr 2016 #3
Holy moley... ReRe Apr 2016 #4
Parties control the primaries, make them shoulder some costs. alfredo Apr 2016 #15
wounder what kind of back room deal they made with the jwirr Apr 2016 #47
It's not too late. Someone could. cannabis_flower Apr 2016 #71
That's a good question... ReRe Apr 2016 #76
Bernie ran as a Dem for equal access to campaign funds and visibility. floriduck Apr 2016 #73
That right there was a dirty thing.... ReRe Apr 2016 #78
You are spot on. They would be very happy to disenfranchise all of us! We are just bbgrunt Apr 2016 #74
Seriously! n/t ReRe Apr 2016 #79
Shouldn't they be sued for this? Renew Deal Apr 2016 #5
Is there a VRA to sue over any more? ananda Apr 2016 #6
Voting seems to be relegated to the back bench in this country. Gregorian Apr 2016 #7
It's an all out assault! nt haikugal Apr 2016 #29
Yes, the pattern of suppression all benefits Hillary and we jwirr Apr 2016 #48
We need our Federal Government to step-up and provide online voting for every Local without transpor Sunlei Apr 2016 #8
We need our Federal Government to step-up and provide.... AlbertCat Apr 2016 #20
Absolutely and Exactly! SoapBox Apr 2016 #36
even Local and state elections. I don't want 'local people' to handle voting in the USA. Oversight, Sunlei Apr 2016 #56
Voter suppression: full speed ahead..... blackspade Apr 2016 #9
Where is the federal government, and what about the Voting Rights Act?? ViseGrip Apr 2016 #11
All the money being laundered, 10K a month to Sid, we have no money for elections? ViseGrip Apr 2016 #10
PS. NO complaints from anyone who makes excuses now, when it helps. You'll lose in Nov. ViseGrip Apr 2016 #13
Oh, there will be much wailing and gnashing of teeth come November. frylock Apr 2016 #62
Sue them! hrmjustin Apr 2016 #12
Rhode Island is the new Alabama. KeepItReal Apr 2016 #14
Are you kidding me? gaspee Apr 2016 #85
I'm betting they don't ProudToBeBlueInRhody Apr 2016 #102
Are you the arbiter of what's convenient for every voter in RI? KeepItReal Apr 2016 #114
how many states have been rigged now? restorefreedom Apr 2016 #16
From FB "Bernie Sanders is my Hero" bkkyosemite Apr 2016 #17
2 in 3 Elmer S. E. Dump Apr 2016 #27
By the local establishment. Our conventions are going to be jwirr Apr 2016 #50
Although the DNC should already have filed legal papers to reverse this decision me b zola Apr 2016 #18
I agree but how and who can do that? Each state + our jwirr Apr 2016 #51
It does seem like it would need to be a campaign(s) me b zola Apr 2016 #75
That may be the point but I think they have underestimated jwirr Apr 2016 #81
Welcome to my world laserhaas Apr 2016 #21
Voter suppression is the #1 goal of the Republican Party. yardwork Apr 2016 #22
But all of Rhode Island's top officials are Democrats Shemp Howard Apr 2016 #30
Democrats control elections in Rhode Island. This is to stop Bernie. Elmer S. E. Dump Apr 2016 #31
I agree. n/t Uncle Joe Apr 2016 #87
Close them all. seabeckind Apr 2016 #23
We've reached the point where unlimited money can influence elections we can't afford to hold. bluedigger Apr 2016 #24
They used to talk about an election no one attended. Today jwirr Apr 2016 #53
Why is it that they only found out now? LiberalFighter Apr 2016 #25
hilarious Better call AZ to ask how that worked for them. oldandhappy Apr 2016 #28
When I was Judge of Elections.... mrmpa Apr 2016 #33
The Democratic Party are suppressing the vote to impact the election Cheese Sandwich Apr 2016 #35
This democratic election is being rigged for Hillary Clinton (I don't care what her supporters say) bkkyosemite Apr 2016 #52
Yes. The level of fraud and corruption would make Tammany Hall blush. HooptieWagon Apr 2016 #66
You forgot to mention Vince Foster and Whitewater Democat Apr 2016 #108
It is a decision by a STATE official, not a Democratic official. George II Apr 2016 #77
American Values... nt Gore1FL Apr 2016 #39
We're one of the wealthiest nations on earth and we can't afford Cal Carpenter Apr 2016 #41
This sickens me... ~eom vkkv Apr 2016 #42
Some perspective... HillareeeHillaraah Apr 2016 #43
Soothing words from another voter suppression supporting Hillary supporter. w4rma Apr 2016 #61
Don't worry it's a small state and small states don't matter Cheese Sandwich Apr 2016 #63
Of course small states matter HillareeeHillaraah Apr 2016 #67
Why do you keep saying the state is small? Why does that matter? Cheese Sandwich Apr 2016 #68
What do you see as the act of voter suppression? HillareeeHillaraah Apr 2016 #69
I am a Rhode Islander gaspee Apr 2016 #86
Not everyone who disagrees is corrupt. HillareeeHillaraah Apr 2016 #65
Pardon me if I don't agree with you. Don't support Arizona-like voter suppression, then. w4rma Apr 2016 #92
Well of course I would pardon your disagreeing HillareeeHillaraah Apr 2016 #93
Are you a Republican? You sound like one by making excuses for voter suppression. (nt) w4rma Apr 2016 #95
Aw, see now it's name calling? HillareeeHillaraah Apr 2016 #96
I still can't tell the Clinton supporters from Republicans. (nt) w4rma Apr 2016 #97
Really? HillareeeHillaraah Apr 2016 #98
I don't just have 30,000+ posts. I've been a member of DU since the (s)election. w4rma Apr 2016 #105
You sound like a right wing troll Democat Apr 2016 #110
I didn't call anyone a name HillareeeHillaraah Apr 2016 #112
Anyone who doesn't support my candidate 100% is corrupt! Democat Apr 2016 #109
Spot on HillareeeHillaraah Apr 2016 #113
Anyone who launders huge sums of cash from the big banks to themselves for a short speech is corrupt w4rma Apr 2016 #115
Your tune will change in November. frylock Apr 2016 #64
First we couldn't afford health care, education, water or infrastructure My Good Babushka Apr 2016 #55
It's a primary, not a November general election. Look back in history, many states.... George II Apr 2016 #60
This is not democracy perdita9 Apr 2016 #70
FEEL the austerity... Bodych Apr 2016 #72
Check your polling places, everyone WhiteTara Apr 2016 #80
I didn't realize that was an option. I thought it was our duty to hold free, fair and transparent silvershadow Apr 2016 #82
I live in Rhode Island gaspee Apr 2016 #83
4000% In Purged Voters-NY billhicks76 Apr 2016 #88
419 polling places in RI = 1 per 2.5 square miles jmowreader Apr 2016 #89
arizona pulled the same crap captainarizona Apr 2016 #91
hillary and bill have already filled in all the ballots. everyone should just stay home lol nt msongs Apr 2016 #94
More Hillary shenanigans is what I suspect Android3.14 Apr 2016 #99
Have you heard about the Clinton Body Count and Whitewater? Democat Apr 2016 #111
More than twice the polling places we had in Phoenix for significantly less voters sweetloukillbot Apr 2016 #101
Yet another victim of faux austerity. chapdrum Apr 2016 #103
Just cancel the primary, fuckers. Save more money that way! nt thereismore Apr 2016 #104
None of this would be happening if Bernie Sanders weren't running - it's his fault! LiberalElite Apr 2016 #106
Real nice. Democracy. Enthusiast Apr 2016 #107

brush

(53,778 posts)
2. Repugs probably. What they did in AZ was a rehearsal to suppress dem votes in the general.
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 09:33 AM
Apr 2016

Cost savings my as_.

Shemp Howard

(889 posts)
26. I don't think it's an R vs. D thing.
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 10:24 AM
Apr 2016

I think it's an establishment vs. insurgent thing.

Imagine someone going to their local polling booth on election day and finding it closed. OK, perhaps that person should have known ahead of time. So that person goes over to the nearest open polling place, and finds long lines.

What type of person doesn't have time to stand in a long line to vote? It's the working poor, the people whom Bernie would help most.

brush

(53,778 posts)
34. In AZ the closings were mostly in POC neighborhoods . . .
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 10:36 AM
Apr 2016

and the election officials are all repugs (it's one of the reddest states going) so I think it was definitely repugs v dems there — rehearsal for dem vote suppression the general election. The Clinton camp nor the DNC had anything to do with AZ.

In R.I. it could be different.

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
40. It helps Clinton because her voters are disproportionately absentee voters and early voters
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 10:47 AM
Apr 2016

It suppresses turnout on election day.

Nobody wants to stand in line for hours and hours to vote.


No matter who benefits from it, it is horrible.

brush

(53,778 posts)
44. I agree that no one wants to stand on long lines on election day, but . . .
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 10:53 AM
Apr 2016

"her voters are disproportionately absentee voters and early voters."

I don't know about that.

Sanders will have no absentee or early voters?

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
46. "Disproportionately" means that absentee and early voters are more likely to vote for Clinton.
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 10:59 AM
Apr 2016

That's been very clear in the other states .

It doesn't mean Sanders will have no early and absentee votes.

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
58. yeah of course. Anything that makes it harder to vote will help Clinton
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 11:29 AM
Apr 2016

because her voters are more likely to have already voted by mail.

If something like this has even a 5 percent effect on the election it could matter.

abelenkpe

(9,933 posts)
45. Few CAN wait in line for hours
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 10:58 AM
Apr 2016

Jobs, kids, people don't have that time to spare. And then when they can't vote we'll talk down about all those who didn't vote and ask ourselves why so few participate pretending that we don't know why.

 

HillareeeHillaraah

(685 posts)
49. It's Rhode Island
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 11:06 AM
Apr 2016

The smallest state in the nation.

No ones going to be standing in line for hours and hours.

Inconvenient? Yes

Scandalous? IMO No.

gaspee

(3,231 posts)
84. I have never
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 02:03 PM
Apr 2016

had to wait in line to vote in Rhode Island. Not ever. Not one person in front of me, ever.

Everyone knows about the closings - it is a very small state. There are cities that are bigger.

Dustlawyer

(10,495 posts)
54. If we cannot afford elections then our politicians priorities are screwed up, but then we
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 11:17 AM
Apr 2016

already knew that!

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
4. Holy moley...
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 09:43 AM
Apr 2016

... let's just call the whole thing off! If we can't afford an election, then I guess we don't need 'em anymore? If I didn't know any better, I'd say they're tryin' to disenfranchise all of us!

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
47. wounder what kind of back room deal they made with the
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 11:01 AM
Apr 2016

DNC/Hillary people? This is voter suppression regardless of what they call it. Too bad there is not a way of taking them to court NOW.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
76. That's a good question...
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 12:43 PM
Apr 2016

... who does one call to complain about this? I don't know who to call. Shouldn't there be Federal oversight over our elections? Where the eff did all the money go that we can't afford to have primary and general elections in this country? (I have a theory about that, but too long to get into right now.) You're damn right it's a voter suppression POLICY of the TWO PARTY system we have. Politics. I'm like old George Washington. Who needs it?

 

floriduck

(2,262 posts)
73. Bernie ran as a Dem for equal access to campaign funds and visibility.
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 12:19 PM
Apr 2016

He also expected a fair fight. Based on roadblocks at every turn, it is definitely time to run as an Independent. Chances are, the GOP will try to replace Trump so expect the Donald to run as an Indie also. If that happens, Bernie will be our next President, in my opinion.

For all the critics that will say Bernie was never a Democrat anyway, I will say he has tried but the party wouldn't take him. Therefore, the Political Revolution just became a non-partisan one.

Bernie needs to put our donations to work and run his own way without having to jump through the hoops the Dems has placed on him.

ReRe

(10,597 posts)
78. That right there was a dirty thing....
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 12:59 PM
Apr 2016

... Hillary did. Point the finger at Bernie and say he's not a Democrat. My heart sunk when she did that. He is a Democrat now, since he changed his party affiliation. And we all know he's more of a Democrat than Hillary is, period. Another thing he chose to run as a Democrat for was to assure more of a chance that a Democratic party candidate would win the election. I'm with you, Bernie needs to do his best to ignore his opponent and full speed ahead!

bbgrunt

(5,281 posts)
74. You are spot on. They would be very happy to disenfranchise all of us! We are just
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 12:21 PM
Apr 2016

too messy and demand too much and don't give them enough big money. In fact, they believe we work for them, not the other way around.

Gregorian

(23,867 posts)
7. Voting seems to be relegated to the back bench in this country.
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 09:52 AM
Apr 2016

Is anyone seeing a pattern here? This election is so crooked it's pathetic.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
48. Yes, the pattern of suppression all benefits Hillary and we
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 11:03 AM
Apr 2016

are supposed to be glad she is going to be our president. Wonder if the VRA would have covered this?

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
8. We need our Federal Government to step-up and provide online voting for every Local without transpor
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 09:53 AM
Apr 2016

State provided no-cost transportation to polling locations. And/or a robust easy to use, mail vote system.

 

AlbertCat

(17,505 posts)
20. We need our Federal Government to step-up and provide....
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 10:19 AM
Apr 2016

The same voting methods, equipment, ratio per population of availability for every state if it's a federal election.

Sunlei

(22,651 posts)
56. even Local and state elections. I don't want 'local people' to handle voting in the USA. Oversight,
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 11:23 AM
Apr 2016

Oversight is fine, the access to ballots, data and machines, no. I don't trust local government officials to ALL be honest about elections.

 

ViseGrip

(3,133 posts)
10. All the money being laundered, 10K a month to Sid, we have no money for elections?
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 10:01 AM
Apr 2016

this is ridiculous!

frylock

(34,825 posts)
62. Oh, there will be much wailing and gnashing of teeth come November.
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 11:41 AM
Apr 2016

Of course, the people who are so glib about it today won't have a leg to stand on.

gaspee

(3,231 posts)
85. Are you kidding me?
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 02:06 PM
Apr 2016

DO you know anything about Rhode Island?

I have never had to wait to vote in Rhode Island. Not once, not ever.

I will not have to wait in line to vote this time either.

They could close 3/4 of the polling places and I probably still wouldn't have to wait in line.

Rhode Island is a very small place - to the point I don't think people who haven't been here don't realize how small.

ProudToBeBlueInRhody

(16,399 posts)
102. I'm betting they don't
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 07:21 PM
Apr 2016

My town hall will be open and it will be more than enough to allow everyone to vote in my town. I think it's far more confusing to open six polling places in a town this small for a primary.

My parents already submitted their mail ballots yesterday.

KeepItReal

(7,769 posts)
114. Are you the arbiter of what's convenient for every voter in RI?
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 10:27 AM
Apr 2016

If your first inclination is to think closing over half the polling places in a state is cool (as if the state lost over half of its primary voters), we don't have anything to talk about.

You're not inconvenienced, so nobody else must be. Myopic, to say the least.

Dems have lost elections due to voter caging, poll taxes (voter ID), and closing polling places in traditional Dem voting precincts.

If you wanna be on the side of closing polling places, have at it.




bkkyosemite

(5,792 posts)
17. From FB "Bernie Sanders is my Hero"
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 10:17 AM
Apr 2016

"OMG, I just checked my RI voter information & my party has been changed to republican. Being from Rhode Island, our primary is the 26th. Also, found out RHODE ISLAND IS CLOSING 66% OF POLLING PLACES FOR OUR APRIL 26TH PRESIDENTIAL PRIMARY-that's 1 in 3.
I went to my town hall before the cut off date to vote in the primaries & checked what party I was affiliated with. I was registered independant & changed it to Democrat (just to be sure I could vote in the primary)."

This entire election is being rigged.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
50. By the local establishment. Our conventions are going to be
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 11:08 AM
Apr 2016

a hoax. The only thing real about them will be the riots outside on the streets. Sound familiar?

me b zola

(19,053 posts)
18. Although the DNC should already have filed legal papers to reverse this decision
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 10:17 AM
Apr 2016

...Citizens, do not wait for them to do it for us. We must act NOW, before election day.

me b zola

(19,053 posts)
75. It does seem like it would need to be a campaign(s)
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 12:30 PM
Apr 2016

Last edited Thu Apr 21, 2016, 02:38 PM - Edit history (1)

This is all so frustrating. Maybe that's the point, for us all to get so frustrated that we just give up.

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
81. That may be the point but I think they have underestimated
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 01:31 PM
Apr 2016

the youth. They are not going to give up because it is their lives we are dealing with here.

Shemp Howard

(889 posts)
30. But all of Rhode Island's top officials are Democrats
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 10:30 AM
Apr 2016

RI Governor, Lieutenant Governor, Attorney General, Secretary of State...all are Democrats.

Something funny is going on here, and for once it doesn't involve Republicans.

 

Elmer S. E. Dump

(5,751 posts)
31. Democrats control elections in Rhode Island. This is to stop Bernie.
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 10:30 AM
Apr 2016

I would not be surprise if most of the poll closings are where young university age kids are.

seabeckind

(1,957 posts)
23. Close them all.
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 10:21 AM
Apr 2016

Vote by mail.

No ID, better turnout, better informed, less costly.

The jerk who feels standing in the rain is patriotic can go to the central location and knock on the door and hand it to the security guy.

Lord, this country really clings to outdated nonsense, doesn't it?

jwirr

(39,215 posts)
53. They used to talk about an election no one attended. Today
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 11:13 AM
Apr 2016

we have the election that does not exist. Between the 33 state back door deals, the super-delegates and this kind of shit - the voters are there but the election does not exist because an election implies a choice. That is being denied to us.

November may very well be the election no one comes to.

mrmpa

(4,033 posts)
33. When I was Judge of Elections....
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 10:36 AM
Apr 2016

in Allegheny County in PA, in my City of Pittsburgh Ward I was precinct #29, there were more than 29 in my Ward. Just in the City there were 34 wards, so just say average of 10 districts per ward, that is 340 polling places just in the City. That's more than twice the number in Rhode Island and the population of Pittsburgh is between 300,000 and 400,000 people.

Then go outlying suburbs which brings the metropolitan region to a bout 1.5 million add probably another 200-300 polling places.

Each polling place has a Judge of Elections ($120 pay) & at least 3 board members ($105 each) that's $335 pay per place. If Allegheny County can afford this, why can't Rode Island?

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
35. The Democratic Party are suppressing the vote to impact the election
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 10:38 AM
Apr 2016

The entire state government is controlled by Democratics

Democat

(11,617 posts)
108. You forgot to mention Vince Foster and Whitewater
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 08:47 AM
Apr 2016

But it's still clear that you're a right wing troll.

 

HillareeeHillaraah

(685 posts)
43. Some perspective...
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 10:50 AM
Apr 2016

Rhode island is a really small state. It takes about an hour to drive through it.

A high turnout for a primary is about 216,000 total for the whole state. They're bringing in hundreds of extra booths and are hiring more poll workers per locale so while there may be lines, it won't look like say Chicago in 2004.

All local television, radio and newspapers are reporting on it so people are hearing about it. It's a real small state and everybody is related to or knows everybody it seems so word gets around quickly there.



And there will be instructions at the closed sites as to the closest open polling place.

There are greater injustices to get riled up about, IMO.


((I have a lot of relatives in Rhode Island, I'm very fond of the place and keep up on it regularly))

 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
61. Soothing words from another voter suppression supporting Hillary supporter.
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 11:38 AM
Apr 2016

The corruption you see, isn't the corruption you are looking for.

 

HillareeeHillaraah

(685 posts)
67. Of course small states matter
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 11:57 AM
Apr 2016

I'm just saying it's more likely there's no cabal orchestrating voter suppression going on.

It's a small state that's struggling with budget issues and consolidating polling locations for a primary is not nefarious.

But people see what they expect to see I suppose.

Peace,

 

Cheese Sandwich

(9,086 posts)
68. Why do you keep saying the state is small? Why does that matter?
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 12:00 PM
Apr 2016

It seems like you want to downplay the impact of any possible voter suppression in Rhode Island.
 

HillareeeHillaraah

(685 posts)
69. What do you see as the act of voter suppression?
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 12:12 PM
Apr 2016

Having to walk a few more blocks or drive another mile to another polling place?

Waiting 20 minutes to vote instead of 10 minutes? If that?

What exactly are you rising up against in a very manageable election like the primary for the State of Rhode Island? The folks who set out to vote will vote. It's not like the Polling places will be so far away from each other, so remote and hidden, with mile long lines manufactured to create voter suppression. It's just not...the state's not that big and the population's not that huge to create the situations you picture...

My mom used to say, you pick and choose your battles....

Is this really a battle? Feels like just an opportunity to pile on and complain about stuff...

gaspee

(3,231 posts)
86. I am a Rhode Islander
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 02:09 PM
Apr 2016

It is a very small place. I live in the 2nd largest city in the state.

I have never, ever, ever had to wait in a line to vote in Rhode Island. Not once, not ever.

They could close 3/4 of the polling places in the state and I wouldn't have to wait in a line.

There are about a million people in the entire state.

 

HillareeeHillaraah

(685 posts)
65. Not everyone who disagrees is corrupt.
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 11:52 AM
Apr 2016

But if corruption is what you see, well that's what it is for you.

Have a pleasant day.

 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
92. Pardon me if I don't agree with you. Don't support Arizona-like voter suppression, then.
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 04:29 PM
Apr 2016

Arizona used the "saving money" excuse too.

 

HillareeeHillaraah

(685 posts)
93. Well of course I would pardon your disagreeing
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 04:33 PM
Apr 2016

However, here's a first hand account of voting from someone who lives in Rhode Island

http://www.democraticunderground.com/?com=view_post&forum=1107&pid=111235

6. My polling place

Is normally the elementary school in my neighborhood - it has moved to the senior center at the other end of the parking lot (with a high school between) - they are BOTH usually polling places which is a GIANT waste of money.

I swear all these people screeching about voter suppression are a bit crazy - they don't know a thing about this state and they are tearing their hair out over it.


 

HillareeeHillaraah

(685 posts)
96. Aw, see now it's name calling?
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 05:35 PM
Apr 2016

No I am a lifelong PROUD democrat who knows Rhode Island.

And for the life of me I don't get why you think this is voter suppression.

Pick and choose your battles. This is not a voting crisis. Even Rhode Islanders say so.

Fight the good fight but fight a real one.

Peace

 

HillareeeHillaraah

(685 posts)
98. Really?
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 05:49 PM
Apr 2016

I would think after 30,000+ posts you would have had a clearer sense of parties, politics and policy differences.

Ok, I'll believe you don't know the difference but it's a curious thing to admit about yourself

 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
105. I don't just have 30,000+ posts. I've been a member of DU since the (s)election.
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 10:16 PM
Apr 2016

And, yes, I can't tell you Hillary supporters from any typical Republican. Ya'll parrot the same precise talking points that they do and typically take the same precise positions (but for our DINO, instead) as they do.

 

w4rma

(31,700 posts)
115. Anyone who launders huge sums of cash from the big banks to themselves for a short speech is corrupt
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 01:14 PM
Apr 2016

Anyone who defends that is an enabler of corruption.

My Good Babushka

(2,710 posts)
55. First we couldn't afford health care, education, water or infrastructure
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 11:20 AM
Apr 2016

... and now we can't even afford elections! We might as well close shop.

George II

(67,782 posts)
60. It's a primary, not a November general election. Look back in history, many states....
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 11:35 AM
Apr 2016

....decide not to OPEN (as opposed to "close&quot all of their polling places because primary turnout is typically 1/3 to 1/2 that of a general election.

It's not a conspiracy, it's a common sense move that has been done frequently in the past.

perdita9

(1,144 posts)
70. This is not democracy
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 12:13 PM
Apr 2016

This is the oligarchy trying to stay in charge.

If you don't have $ for elections, then the first place you should to go get it is from the tax breaks you gave to corporations.

Bodych

(133 posts)
72. FEEL the austerity...
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 12:15 PM
Apr 2016

...and you'll understand why we can't have single-payer, why we must work with banks instead of breaking them up, why we can't provide free public college to ALL, etc.

If anybody imagines that Bernie Sanders and his supporters concocted this, you don't know how to read the writing on the wall.

Now figure out why this decision was made this week, why it was so vital to act now. Are the crowds at Sanders rallies scaring some people?

Or maybe we should just wait until AFTER the damned results are a done deal and irreversible.

The SCOTUS started this, and the Democratic party is a willing accomplice.

What exactly ARE the cost savings, btw? Are they so major that the DNC couldn't pick up the cost to leave the polling places open?

WhiteTara

(29,715 posts)
80. Check your polling places, everyone
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 01:20 PM
Apr 2016

and vote early if it's an option. There is some warning this time, don't get caught in the squeeze/

 

silvershadow

(10,336 posts)
82. I didn't realize that was an option. I thought it was our duty to hold free, fair and transparent
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 01:41 PM
Apr 2016

elections no matter the cost. Huh.

gaspee

(3,231 posts)
83. I live in Rhode Island
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 02:02 PM
Apr 2016

And I vote in every election. Not once, in all my years of voting here, have I ever had to stand in a line to vote. Not in presidential years, not in primaries, not in general elections - not in any single election - EVER - has there been a line. I mean, not even having to wait 10 seconds. No line whatsoever. I have voted in the morning, in the middle of the day, at the last second. I never go at the same time.

I live in the 2nd largest city in the state.

Paranoid people who have no clue, I do not think you have to worry about Rhode Islanders having to wait in line.

 

billhicks76

(5,082 posts)
88. 4000% In Purged Voters-NY
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 03:03 PM
Apr 2016

In many districts. Also 126000 purged in Brooklyn is half the voters. The idiots who say means nothing because Clinton won Brooklyn 60-40 are really excusing voter suppression? They are no different than republican hacks then and are another reason Americans want nothing to do with the two party system anymore. Hey geniuses...voters could've been purged based on specific demographic data like is done in the South. On the South there is a 900% better chance you will be purged if you're Black. In a NY democratic primary that wouldn't help Clinton so I bet it was done primarily to young voters or another group disfavoring Clinton.

jmowreader

(50,557 posts)
89. 419 polling places in RI = 1 per 2.5 square miles
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 03:18 PM
Apr 2016

According to Wikipedia, there is 1,045 square miles of land in the state of Rhode Island. There are thirteen metropolitan areas in the United States that have more land than the entire state of Rhode Island. And as with most states, the majority of RI's population is bunched up in the cities.

Sometimes a cigar is just a cigar - and sometimes a cost-cutting move is just a cost-cutting move. They should be fine with 144 polling stations.

 

Android3.14

(5,402 posts)
99. More Hillary shenanigans is what I suspect
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 06:26 PM
Apr 2016

This whole thing is a disgrace and we are going to regret the whole mess if we end up electing Clinton or Trump.

Democat

(11,617 posts)
111. Have you heard about the Clinton Body Count and Whitewater?
Fri Apr 22, 2016, 08:51 AM
Apr 2016

Check Rush Limbaugh's website, you'll find much to love there.

LiberalElite

(14,691 posts)
106. None of this would be happening if Bernie Sanders weren't running - it's his fault!
Thu Apr 21, 2016, 10:32 PM
Apr 2016

See what they have to resort to? If we'd consented to a coronation, no worries!

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Rhode Island closes 66 pe...