Regulators introduce new rules to curb Wall Street pay
Source: Washington Post
NEW YORK U.S. regulators proposed new rules on Thursday to overhaul the way Wall Street executives are paid, addressing years of complaints that excessive bonuses and salaries helped lead to the 2008 financial crisis.
The proposals are aimed at ensuring executives dont make risky bets to boost their pay and then walk away with a large bonus before the consequences become clear. Under the proposed rules, for example, the nations largest banks would have up to seven years to claw back an executives bonuses if it turns out their actions hurt the institution.
The regulations are one of the last uncompleted provisions of 2010s financial reform package approved by Congress, known as Dodd Frank, and one of its most controversial. A team of regulators, including those from the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Reserve, initially proposed limits to pay and bonuses given to top executives at financial institutions in 2011.
But critics pounced on the proposal as weak, noting that it did not address the compensation of traders who can draw some of the biggest bonuses.
[font size=1]-snip-[/font]
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/business/economy/regulators-introduce-new-rules-to-curb-wall-street-pay/2016/04/21/4a8ae25c-07cf-11e6-b283-e79d81c63c1b_story.html
By Renae Merle April 21 at 11:09 AM
Human101948
(3,457 posts)as they always do.
Funny how the corrupt with money, find ways to continue to make more money.
Turbineguy
(37,332 posts)If they were making money, perhaps people wouldn't mind so much. They've become a net-zero or even a drag on the economy.
packman
(16,296 posts)Greasy, slimy, oozy things have a way of their own. Does anyone believe this or is it just a Dr. Feelgood thing?
UpInArms
(51,284 posts)all income over $250,000 is taxed at 95%
the corporations then push that money outward to ALL employees and no one gets a free ride
ReRe
(10,597 posts)elleng
(130,917 posts)'Regulators?' WTF, anyone have any idea how many regulators there are in DC???
I may have missed it, but WHICH regulators/regulatory authority proposed this???
aggiesal
(8,915 posts)Like CEO's can't make more than 100x the average of non-executives pay plus
some percentage, like 2% based on profit made.
That way, if they want higher pay, they'd have to get the workers higher
pay to raise the average. Plus make more profit for the company, make more money.
Igel
(35,317 posts)They won't work, of course, because regulators aren't omniscient but think they are. (When the regulators run into regs they don't like at work or at home, they, too, probably work hard in their own interests to work around them.)
But it may take a while to work out the work-arounds.
They may also have nasty consequences. A lot of the excesses we see and get outraged over are the results of work-arounds to prior attempts to impose regulatory will on CEOs and traders. By forcing them to be clever, we showed them how to be clever in ways that not only got them their previous perks but new levels of perkitudinous splendor.
Most people will complain that the regs don't do what those particular people want them to do. "They're not strong enough" will mean "those regs don't accomplish our goal, but are intended to accomplish the regulators' goals." Mostly with glee at punishing those with large bonuses or with the hopes that if those people over there don't get large bonuses the money will go elsewhere.
The glee is petty and banal, the hopes in vain.