‘Elite’ Dating Site BeautifulPeople.com Leaks Details Of 1.1m Users
Source: Tech Week Europe
Names, addresses and incomes among details of BeautifulPeople.com users now up for sale
Members of elite dating website BeautifulPeople.com have been warned that their personal details have been leaked and put up for sale online.
Information such as names, addresses, sexual preference and even income are among the details revealed in the leak of the sites database, which contains around 1.1 million users.
Details of around 15 million private messages were also revealed, one researcher told Forbes, which could prove embarrassing for any of the sites members who may not have been entirely single.
Read more: http://www.techweekeurope.co.uk/security/cyberwar/beautifulpeople-dating-site-leaks-details-190725
houston16revival
(953 posts)what a shame
libodem
(19,288 posts)Oneironaut
(5,506 posts)LiberalArkie
(15,720 posts)LiberalArkie
(15,720 posts)FSogol
(45,493 posts)DavidDvorkin
(19,480 posts)Or just imagine that they are.
bemildred
(90,061 posts)The internet is a public place.
Nihil
(13,508 posts)> Information such as names, addresses, sexual preference and even income
> are among the details revealed in the leak of the sites database ...
> Details of around 15 million private messages were also revealed,
> one researcher told Forbes, which could prove embarrassing for any of the
> sites members who may not have been entirely single.
Some hypocritical liars are about to find out what their partners think about
their stated sexual preferences and their "private" messages to strangers ...
yellowcanine
(35,699 posts)Chan790
(20,176 posts)I'm not single, but my girlfriend knows I'm dating other people. I'm not hiding anything from her. She's also dating other people. (Why? It's a question I get a lot so I'll answer before it's asked. She's homoflexible. I'm kinky. She's vanilla. I'm not a member of her primary sexual-orientation. I'm gender-queer. She's not. We both have needs that need to be met outside of our primary relationship to each other. We both enjoy group fun. Because this is what we decided together that we want out of this relationship.)
Since we're both adult children of politically-connected and powerful families...would it be an embarrassment and scandal if our agreed-upon non-monogamy were made public?
Yes. It would.
jcgoldie
(11,631 posts)Should have been called meetanasshole.com.
anigbrowl
(13,889 posts)It seems to annoy quite a few people here that some folk are objectively better-looking than others.
Response to anigbrowl (Reply #14)
jcgoldie This message was self-deleted by its author.
sofa king
(10,857 posts)Frank Cannon
(7,570 posts)Ain't no chance that even 20% of those profiles remotely resemble reality, and the rest contain at least a few falsifications.
roamer65
(36,745 posts)Oh, whoops Trumpf has his own site to gloat at.