Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Eugene

(61,900 posts)
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 07:09 PM Apr 2016

Columnist quits over ban on him writing about billionaire Sheldon Adelson

Source: The Guardian

Las Vegas Review-Journal columnist John L Smith resigned on Tuesday over an internal ban on him writing columns about the newspaper’s owner, billionaire casino owner Sheldon Adelson.

In a letter that he left copies of on newsroom desks, Smith said that due to “recent events” he will “no longer remain employed” by the company.

I learned many years ago about the importance of not punching down in weight class. You don’t hit “little people” in this craft, you defend them. In Las Vegas, a quintessential company town, it’s the blowhard billionaires and their political toadies who are worth punching. And if you don’t have the freedom to call the community’s heavyweights to account, then that “commentary” tag isn’t worth the paper on which it’s printed.

The Review-Journal’s newly hired editor, Keith Moyer, made the gag order public on Saturday during an interview with the Society of Professional Journalists, when he said: “As long as I’m editor, John won’t write about Sheldon Adelson.”

Moyer claimed the policy was due to a conflict of interest, citing Adelson’s failed defamation suit against Smith in 2005 regarding a passage of his book Sharks in the Desert: The Founding Fathers and Current Kings of Las Vegas.

[font size=1]-snip-[/font]


Read more: http://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/apr/26/columnist-resigns-sheldon-adelson-las-vegas-review-journal



Daniel Hernandez in Las Vegas
Tuesday 26 April 2016 23.05 BST
15 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Columnist quits over ban on him writing about billionaire Sheldon Adelson (Original Post) Eugene Apr 2016 OP
Rare journalist, it seems Jackie Wilson Said Apr 2016 #1
True journalist. We need more. 840high Apr 2016 #4
Conflict of interest, indeed. Beartracks Apr 2016 #2
I've never seen Smith's book rpannier Apr 2016 #3
The LVRJ made a statement on Facebook right after Adelson purchased it Miles Archer Apr 2016 #5
However NewJeffCT Apr 2016 #6
Agreed, bias can be very subtle Miles Archer Apr 2016 #8
I remember 10-12 years back or so NewJeffCT Apr 2016 #10
Nothing Suttle a out the Rest bias Egnever Apr 2016 #13
Here it is. mahatmakanejeeves Apr 2016 #7
It really was that kind of post. Miles Archer Apr 2016 #9
Kudos to "Mr Smith Goes to Vegas" Uncle Joe Apr 2016 #11
Sheldon adelson also is the main financier FlatBaroque Apr 2016 #12
I respect real journalists. Enthusiast Apr 2016 #14
Adelson is one of several maggots... gregcrawford Apr 2016 #15

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts)
5. The LVRJ made a statement on Facebook right after Adelson purchased it
Tue Apr 26, 2016, 09:37 PM
Apr 2016

Wish I could go back and find it, because it was in alignment with Smith's remark. To paraphrase, they basically said that the purchase of the paper would have no impact on its journalism, that they had no intention of showing bias in default to Adelson, and that if any readers detected bias, they were free to call the paper on it...and encouraged to do so.

NewJeffCT

(56,828 posts)
6. However
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 09:02 AM
Apr 2016

will readers actually detect bias if the paper doesn't cover a potential scandal or criminal activity regarding Adelson? By omitting a potentially negative story about one of the GOP sugar daddies, it's something that will slip by most readers, and then the editors can say that "well, nobody called us about that story, so it must not have been important..."

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts)
8. Agreed, bias can be very subtle
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 09:38 AM
Apr 2016

I think they were talking more about flat-out endorsements while neglecting left candidates and issues (or putting a right slant on the ones they do cover).

Seemed like it was more of an attempt to disassociate themselves from any agenda Adelson might have, to assure readers that Rupert Murdoch hadn't moved in and set up shop.

NewJeffCT

(56,828 posts)
10. I remember 10-12 years back or so
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 09:49 AM
Apr 2016

A guy I worked with loved the Drudge Report and he said how it wasn't biased like Fox News because Drudge just puts in articles from different sources there... the guy was a Republican, but was open minded enough to admit that Fox News was biased for Republicans, but couldn't quite see how Drudge was biased.

so, I explained to the guy that if there are two politicians involved in separate scandals, but Drudge only links to articles about one politician, isn't that just as biased? While he agreed with my point, I don't think he stopped loving Drudge.

(I was thinking of Gary Condit vs Joe Scarborough at the time - the media was all over Condit, but hardly a peep was heard about a similar scandal involving Scarborough. You'd have thought the media would have eaten up two politicians with dead interns and how it's an epidemic in Congress, but no, barely a mention of Scarborough.)

Miles Archer

(18,837 posts)
9. It really was that kind of post.
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 09:40 AM
Apr 2016

Who knows, maybe they used it as their inspiration.

But it was a pledge to "tell all the news honestly." And they published it about 30 seconds after the ink was dry on the contract.

FlatBaroque

(3,160 posts)
12. Sheldon adelson also is the main financier
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 05:06 PM
Apr 2016

Behind netanyahu (Yay! My autocorrect changed netanyahu to metastasis). In that case he similarly gives away the most printed newspaper in Israel, and the sole purpose of the paper is to pimp netanyahu.

gregcrawford

(2,382 posts)
15. Adelson is one of several maggots...
Wed Apr 27, 2016, 06:44 PM
Apr 2016

... enriching themselves on the carcass of democracy in this country. Scum like Adelson and the Kochs have brought the nation to the brink of ruin, but their wholly-owned subsidiary, the Republican Party, rabid hyenas that they are, obstruct every effort to avoid a total collapse. I hate them with every fiber of my being. And I got a whole MESS of fibers!

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Columnist quits over ban ...