Supreme Court justices seem skeptical of McDonnell’s conviction
Source: Washington Post
Supreme Court justices on Wednesday seemed prepared to overturn the 2014 corruption conviction of former Virginia governor Robert F. McDonnell and perhaps make it harder for prosecutors to bring charges against politicians who provide favors for their benefactors.
Justices on both sides of the ideological divide expressed concern about federal corruption laws that could criminalize what they variously called routine or everyday actions that politicians perform for campaign contributors or supporters who have provided them with gifts.
For better or for worse, it puts at risk behavior that is common, said Justice Stephen G. Breyer, who along with Chief Justice John G. Roberts Jr. suggested that the federal corruption laws are so vague that they might be unconstitutional.
Roberts also noted a brief filed on McDonnells behalf by former White House counsels to the past five presidents, including President Obama, that said upholding McDonnells conviction would cripple the ability of elected officials to fulfill their role in our representative democracy.
Read more: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/courts_law/gifts-and-politics-supreme-court-to-hear-sides-in-former-virginia-governors-case/2016/04/27/1483fb88-0bf5-11e6-a6b6-2e6de3695b0e_story.html
AlbertCat
(17,505 posts)Good behavior that is common or bad behavior that is common?
What are they talking about?
still_one
(92,190 posts)mpcamb
(2,870 posts)McDonnell and his wife are guilty as hell. The worst outcome of his case gaining a tie vote is how it stretches the rule of what's acceptable for public office. There can always be some reason someone gives you money and more and more,there's no penalty for malfeasance.
cstanleytech
(26,291 posts)still_one
(92,190 posts)cstanleytech
(26,291 posts)NCjack
(10,279 posts)Lloyd Blankfein and his political recipients are dancing with joy. We will no longer be allowed to strike politicians with our crutches while they rob us.
perdita9
(1,144 posts)...where he was staying and who was hosting him when he died?
Democat
(11,617 posts)I doubt the Supreme Court is going to help you or me out of speeding ticket.
no_hypocrisy
(46,110 posts)MattP
(3,304 posts)To Mcdonnell's case, whack l!!!
curiouso
(57 posts)Can private citizens initiate impeachment proceedings - or at very least recall - against members of the Supreme Court who are willing to let Siegelman rot in jail but think Mcdonnell got a raw deal?
WHEN CRABS ROAR
(3,813 posts)elected and un elected as well.
moonscape
(4,673 posts)in many (most?) health care facilities from concern of favoritism, certainly we could allow our government employees to have an ethical standard that would rise to that of nursing homes ...
Arizona Roadrunner
(168 posts)Hey have you read about all of the trips the members of the Supreme Court take that are paid for by some vested interest? Wonder how much of their reactions will be due to their own "outlook" vs. what the general public accepts as "bribes" etc.?
sulphurdunn
(6,891 posts)cripple the ability of elected officials to fulfill their role in our representative democracy.
It's all OK unless you're willing to call it bribery, but calling it what it is would fill our prisons with politicians.
JudyM
(29,248 posts)Supremes would take a look at what's happened since Citizens United and try to rein it in with this case.
Damn!!!!!
Festivito
(13,452 posts)turbinetree
(24,701 posts)wrong giving a 20,000 dollar watch, pay for a wedding, asking for some favors on the side about getting vitamins, it just fine and dandy------------------wink------------- wink.
Hell, lets all go to the Koch, Pope, Aldelson, Devos, ect... get together's or any other get together's from both parties and see what happening, in the world of the ALEC class for example, of how to have one form of justice for the peons and another form of justice for the wealthy professional class-----------------that's the ticket.
The peoples federal government is just over reaching when it comes to bribery and fraud---------------damn.
"Justices on both sides of the ideological divide expressed concern about federal corruption laws that could criminalize what they variously called routine or everyday actions that politicians perform for campaign contributors or supporters who have provided them with gifts. "
"Roberts also noted a brief filed on McDonnells behalf by former White House counsels to the past five presidents, including President Obama, that said upholding McDonnells conviction would cripple the ability of elected officials to fulfill their role in our representative democracy.
Lets look at how to make bribery easier -------------------A----OK, give me a 20,000 dollar watch----------------wink, wink, because it may "cripple representative democracy", what a bunch of horse-