Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

Judi Lynn

(160,534 posts)
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 05:18 PM Apr 2016

Oklahoma legislators seek change in sodomy law after ruling

Source: Associated Press

Oklahoma legislators seek change in sodomy law after ruling

Sean Murphy, Associated Press

Updated 4:07 pm, Thursday, April 28, 2016

OKLAHOMA CITY (AP) — After Oklahoma's highest court dismissed a criminal charge against a 17-year-old boy accused of forcing a heavily intoxicated girl to perform oral sex, outraged lawmakers vowed Thursday they'll move quickly to fix an apparent loophole in the state's forcible sodomy law.

The Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals' unanimous ruling, first reported by Oklahoma Watch, a nonprofit journalism corporation, said last month that while Oklahoma's rape law addresses unconscious or intoxicated victims, the forcible sodomy law does not. The court said it could not expand the "fair meaning" of the law to justify someone's prosecution.

"The Legislature's inclusion of an intoxication circumstance for the crime of rape ... is not found in the five very specific requirements of forcible sodomy," the court wrote.

The teen suspect was initially charged in 2015 in Tulsa County District Court. A lower court judge had dismissed the case last year, but the state appealed.

Read more: http://www.chron.com/news/crime/article/Oklahoma-legislators-seek-change-in-sodomy-law-7381463.php

2 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Oklahoma legislators seek change in sodomy law after ruling (Original Post) Judi Lynn Apr 2016 OP
Post removed Post removed Apr 2016 #1
Thats just silly and it would grind cases to a halt in court because judges would recuse themselves cstanleytech Apr 2016 #2

Response to Judi Lynn (Original post)

cstanleytech

(26,291 posts)
2. Thats just silly and it would grind cases to a halt in court because judges would recuse themselves
Thu Apr 28, 2016, 05:32 PM
Apr 2016

to avoid such cases.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Oklahoma legislators seek...