Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jpak

(41,758 posts)
Mon May 2, 2016, 08:12 PM May 2016

GAO: Delayed ship maintenance threatens Navy's ability to meet operational demands

Source: The Virginia Pilot

After years of long and repeated deployments to the Middle East, the Navy’s fleet of warships is behind on maintenance, possibly threatening the service’s ability to meet future missions overseas.

That’s according to a report released Monday by the Government Accountability Office, which found that the Navy bypassed some ship maintenance over the past 15 years to keep pace with the demands of multiple wars.

That’s led to a backlog in work needed to keep the fleet going.

“These decisions have reduced the predictability of ship deployments for sailors and for the ship repair industrial base,” the report said. “They have also resulted in declining ship conditions across the fleet and have increased the amount of time that ships require to complete maintenance in the shipyards.”

<more>

Read more: http://pilotonline.com/news/military/local/gao-delayed-ship-maintenance-threatens-navy-s-ability-to-meet/article_f2be76bb-2af5-5dce-9828-c35854b714e3.html



thanks bush and cheney
11 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
GAO: Delayed ship maintenance threatens Navy's ability to meet operational demands (Original Post) jpak May 2016 OP
Delaying maintenance is about the most expensive way to save money there is. Turbineguy May 2016 #1
And six times as much if the ship is worked on at Bender Shipyard. cloudbase May 2016 #2
Meanwhile the F-35... whereisjustice May 2016 #3
This doesn't surprise me!!! jdadd May 2016 #4
We could save a bundle and put everyone to work houston16revival May 2016 #5
Doesn't Obama share some of the blame? hack89 May 2016 #6
Obama had to deal with the absolute fucking mess that Bush & cheney left him jpak May 2016 #7
How does that prevent him from ensuring the Navy had time to do proper maintenance? hack89 May 2016 #8
It's more complicated than that. nitpicker May 2016 #9
I understand that hack89 May 2016 #11
Anything that degrades American military capability GliderGuider May 2016 #10

Turbineguy

(37,343 posts)
1. Delaying maintenance is about the most expensive way to save money there is.
Mon May 2, 2016, 08:21 PM
May 2016

It costs at least 3 times as much to catch up plus loss of service.

cloudbase

(5,520 posts)
2. And six times as much if the ship is worked on at Bender Shipyard.
Mon May 2, 2016, 08:27 PM
May 2016

Then they have to take it somewhere else to get the work done properly.

Avondale is a close second to Bender.

I wouldn't let either of them work on a bicycle.

jdadd

(1,314 posts)
4. This doesn't surprise me!!!
Mon May 2, 2016, 08:38 PM
May 2016

I worked over 30 years in manufacturing, Maintenance.....Trying to perform maintenance of machinery was like trying to change a tire on a moving car....Management just wouldn't let us shut down long enough, to get it done. I'd just wait for stuff to break, and perform rebuilds..That's the only time anything got serviced....

houston16revival

(953 posts)
5. We could save a bundle and put everyone to work
Mon May 2, 2016, 09:08 PM
May 2016

if we'd do repair, refurb, maintenance

on ships, highways, bridges, houses, neighborhoods, buildings

instead we let it deteriorate and then build new

In many cases I suspect it's neither financially nor resource efficient

jpak

(41,758 posts)
7. Obama had to deal with the absolute fucking mess that Bush & cheney left him
Mon May 2, 2016, 09:21 PM
May 2016

Iraq
Afghanistan
Great Recession

The aftermath of the Iraq war and Bush's abandonment of Afghanistan could not be ignored.

yup

hack89

(39,171 posts)
8. How does that prevent him from ensuring the Navy had time to do proper maintenance?
Mon May 2, 2016, 10:31 PM
May 2016

he is the one that sets the priorities for the military, is he not?

nitpicker

(7,153 posts)
9. It's more complicated than that.
Tue May 3, 2016, 05:47 AM
May 2016

Directly, NAVSEA is responsible for ship maintenance policy and scheduling with the shipyards to get maintenance done.

BUT the combatant commanders request forces in their areas, and the Chief of Naval Operations has to decide whether ships return to port as scheduled or extend deployments. The Truman just got its deployment extended by ay least a month. That then has ripple effects on maintenance scheduling, not to mention the sailors and their families. I'm sure they wish that ISIL would be done for so that these extensions would stop occurring, but that's wishful thinking IMO.

hack89

(39,171 posts)
11. I understand that
Tue May 3, 2016, 08:39 AM
May 2016

I spent 20 years as a SWO. My post was directed more at the knee jerk reaction to blame Bush and Cheney.

 

GliderGuider

(21,088 posts)
10. Anything that degrades American military capability
Tue May 3, 2016, 06:49 AM
May 2016

meets with my approval.

You've killed enough brown people.



On edit:

Here's a partial list of American military "interventions" since 1950. Of these 36 countries, only 3 (Bosnia, Macedonia and Georgia) are predominantly Caucasian. The other 33 (92% of the countries, accounting for an even higher proportion of the casualties) were Asian, African or Central and South American.

Afghanistan
Bolivia
Bosnia and Herzegovina
Cambodia
Cameroon
Chad
Colombia
Côte d'Ivoire
Djibouti
Dominican Republic
El Salvador
Eritrea
Ethiopia
Georgia
Grenada
Haiti
Honduras
Iran
Kenya
Korea
Kuwait
Laos
Lebanon
Liberia
Libya
Macedonia
Nigeria
Pakistan
Panama
Peru
Syria
Thailand
Uganda
Vietnam
Yemen
Zaïre

It's a sorry, racist record.
Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»GAO: Delayed ship mainten...