Welcome to DU! The truly grassroots left-of-center political community where regular people, not algorithms, drive the discussions and set the standards. Join the community: Create a free account Support DU (and get rid of ads!): Become a Star Member Latest Breaking News General Discussion The DU Lounge All Forums Issue Forums Culture Forums Alliance Forums Region Forums Support Forums Help & Search

jpak

(41,758 posts)
Fri May 6, 2016, 02:55 PM May 2016

Treasury rejects a plan to cut pensions for Teamsters

Source: Detroit Free Press

The Teamsters Central States Pension Plan – which proposed drastic cuts to pension checks for hundreds of thousands of retired truck drivers in Michigan and elsewhere – has been told by the U.S. Treasury that its plan has been rejected.

"The application failed to meet the requirement to demonstrate that the proposed benefit reductions are reasonably estimated to allow the plan to avoid insolvency," according to a letter from Treasury Secretary Jacob L. Lew.

Treasury said the proposal also did not fulfill requirements that reductions be equitably distributed and that the notices provided to the average plan participant be understandable.

"While we expect that this will come as a relief to these participants, our decision does not resolve the issues threatening their pension benefits," Lew said in a letter to Congressional leaders.

<more>

Read more: http://www.freep.com/story/money/personal-finance/susan-tompor/2016/05/06/teamsters-treasury-decision-central-states-pension/84014252/

7 replies = new reply since forum marked as read
Highlight: NoneDon't highlight anything 5 newestHighlight 5 most recent replies
Treasury rejects a plan to cut pensions for Teamsters (Original Post) jpak May 2016 OP
Good. Enough with the pension cuts. They are just stealing the pensions now, too. nt silvershadow May 2016 #1
Tax.The.Rich. (n/t) Iggo May 2016 #2
Yes, Wellstone ruled May 2016 #3
Why is the Treasury Department overseeing a pension plan? mahatmakanejeeves May 2016 #4
I read this several times, and it always sounds to me as if Treasury doesn't think their CharlotteVale May 2016 #5
No, the article clearly stated its because they have not demonstrated that these cuts are what will cstanleytech May 2016 #6
I still read it that way. CharlotteVale May 2016 #7
 

Wellstone ruled

(34,661 posts)
3. Yes,
Fri May 6, 2016, 03:27 PM
May 2016

About time,if you can bail out Wall Street, who were the real culprits and the real cause of Central States Investment issues,then we sure as heck can figure out how to save this fund.

BTW,Treasury just saved millions of Teamster Votes for Democrats.

mahatmakanejeeves

(57,516 posts)
4. Why is the Treasury Department overseeing a pension plan?
Fri May 6, 2016, 03:38 PM
May 2016

I thought that the Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation was part of the Department of Labor. Let's see:

Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation

The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation (PBGC) is an independent agency of the United States government that was created by the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (ERISA) to encourage the continuation and maintenance of voluntary private defined benefit pension plans, provide timely and uninterrupted payment of pension benefits, and keep pension insurance premiums at the lowest level necessary to carry out its operations.
....

Leadership

PBGC is headed by a Director, who reports to a board of directors consisting of the Secretaries of Labor, Commerce and Treasury, with the Secretary of Labor as chairman.

Under the Pension Protection Act of 2006, the Director of the PBGC is appointed by the President and confirmed by the Senate. Under prior law, PBGC's Board Chairman appointed an "Executive Director" who was not subject to confirmation.

Well, never mind, then. It is not impossible that the Treasury Department takes a role.

CharlotteVale

(2,717 posts)
5. I read this several times, and it always sounds to me as if Treasury doesn't think their
Fri May 6, 2016, 03:44 PM
May 2016

pensions were cut enough.

I certainly would not expect this Treasury department to protect any rank and file union pensions. Just the opposite.

cstanleytech

(26,300 posts)
6. No, the article clearly stated its because they have not demonstrated that these cuts are what will
Fri May 6, 2016, 03:55 PM
May 2016

likely prevent the plan from going under and thats the only reason.

Latest Discussions»Latest Breaking News»Treasury rejects a plan t...