Either it was or wasn't.

... has not yet been completed. It's similar to the use of the word "alleged" ... even in cases where security video clearly shows the identity of the person committing the crime, because the suspect hasn't been legally convicted of the crime (and hasn't confessed to the crime) it's a hyper-accurate way to describe events.

I'm guessing it's a way for the news organization to cover their asses against claims of bias, interference, or libel. But I agree, it often seems silly and it's a distraction at times.

It's certainly not beyond the realm of possibility that he was offed in a way that would look like suicide, particularly if someone thought he was going to spill the beans about something.

Unfortunately, the department that will investigate his death is the same department that "fails to notice" (i.e. covers up) corruption and abuse year in and year out.

So it will probably remain an open question.

If it isn't ruled a suicide, then his insurance and pension are not in jeopardy for his surviving spouse.